The Impact of Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Low Stress-Coping Capacity on the Effects of Telephone Follow-Up on Recovery Measures After Hysterectomy
article
OA: gold
CC0
AI-generated summary
Preoperative anxiety, depression, and stress-coping capacity did not modify telephone follow-up effects on recovery after hysterectomy, but anxiety increased unplanned contacts.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Background: To investigate if symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress-coping capacity have an impact on the effect of telephone follow-up (TFU) on trajectories of six recovery measures after hysterectomy and influence the occurrence of unplanned telephone contacts (uTCs) and unplanned visits (uVs) to health care providers. Material and Methods: nonrandomized analysis of participants enrolled in a randomized, four-armed, single-blinded, controlled multicenter intervention study comprising 487 women where the women were allocated 1:1:1:1 to one of four TFU models. The Swedish Postoperative Symptom Questionnaire (SPSQ) and two health-related quality of life questionnaires, the EuroQoL-5 dimension with three levels (EQ-5 D-3 L) and the Short-Form-Health Survey (SF-36) assessed the recovery measures. The six recovery measures consisted of the EQ-5D-3L health index, the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), and the maximum and average pain intensity, and symptom sum score obtained from the SPSQ. Psychological distress was evaluated by the psychometric forms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Stress Coping Inventory. The occurrence of uTC and uV within the 6 weeks of follow-up was registered. Results: Preoperative anxiety, depression, and stress-coping capacity did not modify the effects of the TFU models on the trajectories of the recovery measures, although anxiety and depression were strongly associated with all six recovery measures. uTCs, but not uVs occurred more often in the women with anxiety. Conclusions: Preoperative anxiety, depression, and stress-coping capacity did not appear to influence the effects of TFU contacts on the recovery measures after hysterectomy. Preoperative anxiety seemed to increase the occurrence of uTC. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01526668).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (43)
- Depression, anxiety, hostility and hysterectomy via openalex
- Depressive Symptoms Before and After Elective Hysterectomy via openalex
- Effect of nurse-led telephone follow-up on postoperative symptoms and analgesics consumption after benign hysterectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, four-arm, controlled multicenter trial via openalex
- Outcomes of Hysterectomy via openalex
- Short‐term recovery after subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised clinical trial via openalex
- The Effect of Follow-Up Contact on Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Four-Arm, Controlled Multicenter Trial via openalex
- The influence of psychological factors on recovery from hysterectomy via openalex
- doi:10.1177/14574969221083394 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000437299 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155434 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.111 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00594-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/anae.14507 via openalex
- doi:10.1023/a:1013171831202 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/2192568219845662 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0363546520976574 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03342.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/dote.12437 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07426-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1477-7819-9-38 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727250 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/ijn.12239 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.061 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/anae.15215 via openalex
- doi:10.3171/2017.5.spine1734 via openalex
- doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.030 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s44158-022-00057-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00403.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002818 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)60130-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008646.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1188/07.onf.133-141 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00189-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/nnr.0b013e3182002e46 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01674820600712172 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/jxx.0000000000000041 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01059.x via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:19:45.559451+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK