Discordance between the predicted vs. the actually recognized CD8+ T cell epitopes of HCMV pp65 antigen and aleatory epitope dominance

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

CD8+ T cell immune monitoring aims at measuring the numbers and functions of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell populations engaged during immune responses, providing insights into the magnitude and quality of cell-mediated immunity operational in a test subject. The selection of peptides for ex vivo CD8+ T cell detection is critical, however, because for each restricting HLA class I molecule present in a human individual there is a multitude of potential epitopes within complex antigens, and HLA diversity between the test subjects predisposes CD8+ T cell responses to individualized epitope recognition profiles. We report here on a brute force CD8+ T cell epitope mapping approach for the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) pp65 antigen on ten HLA-A*02:01-matched HCMV infected human subjects. In this approach, in each test subject, every possible CD8+ T cell epitope was systematically tested; that is 553 individual peptides that walk the sequence of the HCMV pp65 protein in steps of single amino acids. Highly individualized CD8+ T cell response profiles with aleatory epitope recognition patterns were observed. We compared the actually detected epitope utilization in each individual with epitope prediction ranking for the shared HLA-A*02:01 allele, and for additional HLA class I alleles expressed by each individual. No correlation was found between epitopes’ ranking on the prediction scale and their actual immune dominance. The data suggest that accurate CD8+ T cell immune monitoring might depend on the agnostic reliance on mega peptide pools, or brute force mapping, rather than individualized epitope predictions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00