Semantic distance differently modulates FPVS-EEG responses to words and pictures

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,838 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The organization of semantic knowledge within the brain has long been studied through various theoretical frameworks and is still a matter of debate. Many studies that have helped advancing our knowledge about this topic have approached it in the context of its deterioration, notably in patients with semantic dementia. In healthy subjects, the question whether and how semantic distance between concepts represented by picture or word stimuli influences brain responses remains understudied. In this study with 24 healthy subjects, we used electroencephalography (EEG) recordings coupled with a fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) approach, for the first time, to assess the semantic distance effect with different stimulus modalities. Picture or word stimuli from a reference category (birds) appeared every fourth item among a 4-Hz stream of either man-made objects (forming the high distance [HD] condition) or other animals (low distance [LD] condition). Within a few minutes of recording, EEG responses were observed at the pre-determined frequency of the reference category presentation (at 1 Hz), suggesting its exemplars were activated at least sufficiently to be automatically discriminated from different superordinate (HD) and basic (LD) categories, for both pictures and words. Pictures and words elicited a different pattern of response to semantic distance, with larger amplitudes for HD than LD conditions for pictures but a reversed pattern of somewhat greater amplitudes for LD than HD conditions for words. Our findings support a similarity-based structure of semantic representations and provide evidence for a differential mapping between semantic and picture/word surface representations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* shared last authorship

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00