M3/M21 serum levels in women with adnexal masses and inflammatory diseases
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
M3/M21 serum levels are not suitable for ovarian cancer screening or differentiating adnexal masses but may serve as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer survival.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cytokeratin tumor marker M3/M21 as a screening marker for ovarian cancer, as a predictive marker in patients with adnexal masses and as a prognostic factor in women with ovarian cancer. To determine the specificity of the M3/M21 test, we investigated M3/M21 serum levels in several benign conditions. This retrospective study comprises 37 patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stages Ia to III. Sera of patients with benign cysts, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, inflammatory bowel disease and liver cirrhosis were evaluated in 90, 10, 38, 10 and 20 cases, respectively. With a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 95%, M3/M21 is not suitable as a screening marker for ovarian cancer. Although M3/M21 is able to discriminate between ovarian cancer and benign adnexal tumors (univariate logistic regression, p = 0.0003), M3/M21 does not provide information additional to CA 125. M3/M21 serum levels are elevated in several benign conditions such as liver cirrhosis and inflammatory bowel disease. In ovarian cancer patients, elevated M3/M21 serum levels prior to therapy were associated with poor overall and disease-free survival (log-rank test, p = 0.03; log-rank test, p = 0.01, respectively). M3/M21, while obviously not suitable for screening or differential diagnosis of adnexal masses, could be useful as an additional prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (22)
- W30130811 via openalex
- W152365014 via openalex
- W1547629280 via openalex
- W1966948292 via openalex
- W2016693266 via openalex
- W2024020047 via openalex
- W2024281628 via openalex
- W2028506552 via openalex
- W2042960001 via openalex
- W2047021818 via openalex
- W2068140384 via openalex
- W2081743971 via openalex
- W2092118202 via openalex
- W2399040477 via openalex
- W2402970702 via openalex
- W2413575923 via openalex
- W2418729498 via openalex
- W2431720269 via openalex
- W2463442709 via openalex
- W2471625271 via openalex
- W4234660912 via openalex
- W4321059599 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:40.754221+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK