Abstract
We estimate collapse rates of axion stars in our galaxy based on the axion minicluster mass function of the Milky Way dark matter halo. We consider axion-like particles with different temperature evolution of the axion mass, including the QCD axion with \(m_a = 50\mu\)eV. Combining estimates for the present-day axion star mass function from our previous work with the axion star accretion model predicted by self-similar growth, we can infer the expected number of bosenovae occurring within the Milky Way. Our estimates suggest that for an observation time of \(t_{obs} = 1\)yr, the majority of the up to \(\sim 10^{13}\) bosenovae per galaxy occur in the densest miniclusters with initial overdensity parameter \(\Phi \lesssim 10^4\). We discuss the detectability of such recurring axion bursts within our galactic vicinity and find that, for models with derivative couplings including axion-fermion interactions, potential broadband axion DM experiments can probe a large range of ALP masses \(m_a \lesssim 10^{-6}\)eV and with moderate improvements even the QCD axion case. For axions with non-derivative-type interactions like the axion-photon coupling, our analysis suggests that optimistic predictions with order-one dark matter abundance of axion stars \(f_\star \sim 1\) can be probed by dedicated burst searches.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.