Genetics-driven Risk Predictions with Differentiable Mendelian Randomization

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

Differentiable Mendelian Randomization (DMR) learns risk predictors from genetic data and risk factors without longitudinal data, enabling future disease onset predictions such as type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

The paper introduces Differentiable Mendelian Randomization (DMR), a method to learn predictors of future disease onset without longitudinal datasets that link early risk factors to later outcomes. DMR is trained in a healthy cohort using risk factors and genetic data, plus disease GWAS results, and then applied to estimate risk in new patients using risk factors alone; it is validated via simulations and via predicting incident type 2 diabetes in UK Biobank participants without diabetes using follow-up onset labels, and by predicting future Alzheimer’s onset from brain imaging biomarkers. The authors’ stated limitation is the need for GWAS inputs and the reliance on validation through available follow-up labels rather than broad prospective cohorts. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Accurate predictive models of future disease onset are crucial for effective preventive healthcare, yet longitudinal datasets linking early risk factors to subsequent health outcomes are scarce. To address this challenge, we introduce Differentiable Mendelian Randomization (DMR), an extension of the classical Mendelian Randomization framework to learn risk predictors without longitudinal data. To do so, DMR leverages risk factors and genetic data from a healthy cohort, along with results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of diseases of interest. After training, the learned predictor can be used to assess risk for new patients solely based on risk factors. We validated DMR through comprehensive simulations and in future type 2 diabetes predictions in UK Biobank participants without diabetes, using follow-up onset labels for validation. Finally, we apply DMR to predict future Alzheimer’s onset from brain imaging biomarkers. Overall, with DMR we offer a new perspective in predictive modeling, showing it is possible to learn risk predictors leveraging genetics rather than longitudinal data.
Full text 1,200 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Accurate predictive models of future disease onset are crucial for effective preventive healthcare, yet longitudinal datasets linking early risk factors to subsequent health outcomes are scarce. To address this challenge, we introduce Differentiable Mendelian Randomization (DMR), an extension of the classical Mendelian Randomization framework to learn risk predictors without longitudinal data. To do so, DMR leverages risk factors and genetic data from a healthy cohort, along with results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of diseases of interest. After training, the learned predictor can be used to assess risk for new patients solely based on risk factors. We validated DMR through comprehensive simulations and in future type 2 diabetes predictions in UK Biobank participants without diabetes, using follow-up onset labels for validation. Finally, we apply DMR to predict future Alzheimer’s onset from brain imaging biomarkers. Overall, with DMR we offer a new perspective in predictive modeling, showing it is possible to learn risk predictors leveraging genetics rather than longitudinal data. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00