Full text
7,096 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Predictive Maintenance Beyond the Hype: Total Cost of Ownership Models for Industrial AI Deployments | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 9 April 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Predictive Maintenance Beyond the Hype: Total Cost of Ownership Models for Industrial AI Deployments Author : Ali Sadhik Shaik 0009-0004-8347-083X [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177574488.83538065/v1 138 views 87 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Predictive maintenance (PdM) is the most frequently cited use case for Industrial AI, featured prominently in vendor marketing, industry conference agendas, and enterprise AI strategy documents. Yet the actual return on investment for predictive maintenance AI remains poorly understood, obscured by vendor-driven narratives that emphasize sensor cost reductions and downtime avoidance while systematically underreporting the true costs of deployment. This paper argues that the total cost of ownership for predictive maintenance AI is 2.5-4x higher than vendor projections typically suggest, and that the breakeven horizon is correspondingly longer than most capital expenditure approvals anticipate. Drawing on transaction cost economics and evidence from discrete manufacturing and process industry deployments, the paper proposes the PdM-TCO Framework-a five-stage total cost of ownership model specifically designed for predictive maintenance AI that captures costs across instrumentation, data pipeline construction, model development, operational integration, and continuous improvement. The framework identifies five categories of systematically underreported costs: data engineering infrastructure, change management for maintenance teams, false positive fatigue and its trust erosion effects, model retraining as equipment degrades, and organizational integration overhead. The paper further proposes the PdM Investment Justification Matrix, which identifies the conditions-asset criticality, failure consequence severity, data availability, and maintenance team readiness-under which predictive maintenance AI investment is genuinely justified versus conditions under which simpler condition-based monitoring delivers equivalent value at lower cost. Implications are developed for VP Operations evaluating PdM investments, Plant Managers implementing PdM programs, and CFOs approving capital expenditure for Industrial AI. Supplementary Material File (04 predictive maintenance beyond the hype_ total cost of ownership models for industrial ai deployments.docx.pdf) Download 228.54 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 09 April 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Keywords asset management condition-based monitoring digital transformation industrial ai manufacturing technology predictive maintenance total cost of ownership Authors Affiliations Ali Sadhik Shaik 0009-0004-8347-083X [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 138 views 87 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Ali Sadhik Shaik. Predictive Maintenance Beyond the Hype: Total Cost of Ownership Models for Industrial AI Deployments. Authorea . 09 April 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177574488.83538065/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177574488.83538065/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe24cf5bc30c13d',t:'MTc3OTE4NTMwOQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.