Ligand Binding Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Gating of Insect Odorant Receptor

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,833 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Insect olfactory receptors (ORs) are unique ligand-gated ion channels specialized in detecting volatile molecules. The ancestral M. hrabei MhOR5 operates independently of the Orco co-receptor and exhibits broad ligand-binding capacity, yet the molecular underpinnings of its ligand specificity and gating dynamics have long remained unclear. To resolve this knowledge gap, we applied an integrated molecular dynamics enhanced sampling approach, combining collective variable machine learning, alchemical free energy calculations, and kinetic calculations, to dissect the ligand recognition and gating mechanisms of MhOR5 in complex with two key ligands: eugenol (EOL) and DEET. Our findings reveal striking differences in the binding modes of EOL and DEET, identify dual ligand binding/release pathways (solvent-facing and membrane-facing), and pinpoint two critical molecular determinants: W158 as a central gating residue regulating ligand dissociation, and a proline-disrupted S4 helix that modulates ligand specificity via water-mediated hydrogen bonding with DEET. Thermodynamic and kinetic calculations further demonstrate that DEET binds MhOR5 substantially more stably (-11.2 kcal/mol vs. -8.4 kcal/mol for EOL) and associates marginally faster, while EOL dissociates two to three orders of magnitude more rapidly. Collectively, these findings elucidate the atomic-level mechanisms of MhOR5’s ligand recognition and gating, providing a foundational framework for understanding insect OR function. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Data availability The data that support this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. The input files and scripts relating to the MD simulations can be found at Github [https://github.com/TiefengSong/MhOR5].

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00