Falcons use wind assistance and remote islands to mitigate risk during ocean-crossings

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,781 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Wind conditions play a major role in determining how birds negotiate ecological barriers during long-distance migration. Migrants typically minimize flights over barriers in opposing winds, while crossing the same barriers directly in supportive winds. Nevertheless, even in supportive conditions, barrier-crossings likely involve a number of risk-mitigating behaviors, including the use of stepping stones. We aimed to understand how seasonal ocean-crossings of Eleonora’s falcons (Falco eleonorae) compare in terms of wind support and flight effort, and whether falcons use islands to cross safely in variable wind conditions. To do this we combined GPS-tracking data from 19 individuals over a decade (2012-2022) with wind data from an atmospheric reanalysis model. Despite major differences in wind support, falcons achieved similar ground speeds in both seasons. That is because falcons reduce instantaneous flight effort by flying at lower airspeeds in supportive spring winds (31.5 ± 6.0 km h-1) than in adverse autumn winds (47.4 ± 9.3 km h-1). Overall, it took falcons twice as many flight hours to complete the spring crossings that were 40% greater in terms of air distance compared to autumn crossings. Islands were more frequently used during spring crossings (57.9% individuals in spring vs 21.1% in autumn), and the probability of a falcon using an island significantly increased with weaker wind support in spring (but not in autumn). While wind support partially offsets the extra distance flown over the ocean in spring, isolated islands offer emergency stop-over opportunities when Eleonora’s falcons experience relatively weak wind support during protracted ocean crossings. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00