An adaptive multi-strategy metaheuristic for robust model calibration in large-scale systems biology

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,858 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Parameter estimation is a central challenge in systems biology, particularly for large dynamic models described by nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). These global optimization problems exhibit landscapes which are topologically heterogeneous, often exhibiting a pathological mixture of stiff, smooth valleys and rugged, noisy plateaus, making single-strategy hybrids ineffective. While methods like enhanced Scatter Search (eSS) represent the current state-of-the-art, their rigid intensification strategies can limit performance in large-scale or ill-conditioned scenarios. In this work, we introduce eLSHADE+, a novel metaheuristic architecture designed to adapt to these topological challenges. The proposed algorithm augments a recent Differential Evolution variant (LSHADE) with a probabilistic multistrategy hybridization. Unlike standard memetic algorithms, eLSHADE+ uses three distinct operational modes: (i) gradient-based intensification for precision in differentiable regions, (ii) derivative-free search for robustness against numerical noise, and (iii) pure global exploration to conserve computational resources in complicated basins. Additionally, a logarithmic parameter space transformation is incorporated to facilitate search across multi-scale biological constants. We rigorously evaluated eLSHADE+ using the BioPreDyn benchmark suite, comprising challenging real-world problems. Comparative analysis demonstrates that this adaptive multi-strategy approach yields statistically superior convergence speed and solution accuracy compared to eSS and other competitive metaheuristics, establishing a new baseline for robust model calibration in computational biology. Code and data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18379327. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00