Fast corrective responses in redundant motor control are shaped by intrinsic constraints of movement patterns

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

The paper studied how low-dimensional task errors propagate through a redundant bimanual motor system to produce rapid corrective movements. Participants controlled a virtual stick with both hands and received visual perturbations that either displaced the stick tip (end-effector relevant errors) or changed the stick’s tilt without altering tip position (end-effector irrelevant errors), and the authors compared the resulting corrections. The key finding was that participants made fast, highly stereotyped corrections to both types of perturbations, with end-effector relevant corrections involving coordinated changes across redundant dimensions and even irrelevant perturbations eliciting systematic responses. The authors conclude that these rapid corrections reflect intrinsic coordination constraints rather than flexible re-optimization, though the study’s perturbation design limits inference to this specific virtual bimanual setup. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In real-world motor tasks, body movements unfold in a high-dimensional space, whereas task errors are defined in a lower-dimensional space. How such low-dimensional errors propagate across redundant motor degrees of freedom to generate rapid corrective responses remains poorly understood. To address this question, we developed a redundant bimanual task in which participants manipulated a virtual stick with both hands to move its tip to a visual target. Visual perturbations either displaced the stick tip (end-effector relevant errors) or altered the tilt angle of the stick without affecting the tip position (end-effector irrelevant errors), allowing us to dissociate errors defined in task space from those arising in redundant dimensions. Participants rapidly corrected both types of perturbations using highly stereotyped movement patterns. Corrections to end-effector relevant errors consistently involved coordinated changes across redundant dimensions, and even perturbations that did not affect task success elicited systematic corrective responses. Together, these results demonstrate that fast corrective responses in redundant motor control are not generated by flexible re-optimization, but are instead shaped by intrinsic coordination constraints that govern how visual errors propagate through the motor system.
Full text 1,417 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In real-world motor tasks, body movements unfold in a high-dimensional space, whereas task errors are defined in a lower-dimensional space. How such low-dimensional errors propagate across redundant motor degrees of freedom to generate rapid corrective responses remains poorly understood. To address this question, we developed a redundant bimanual task in which participants manipulated a virtual stick with both hands to move its tip to a visual target. Visual perturbations either displaced the stick tip (end-effector relevant errors) or altered the tilt angle of the stick without affecting the tip position (end-effector irrelevant errors), allowing us to dissociate errors defined in task space from those arising in redundant dimensions. Participants rapidly corrected both types of perturbations using highly stereotyped movement patterns. Corrections to end-effector relevant errors consistently involved coordinated changes across redundant dimensions, and even perturbations that did not affect task success elicited systematic corrective responses. Together, these results demonstrate that fast corrective responses in redundant motor control are not generated by flexible re-optimization, but are instead shaped by intrinsic coordination constraints that govern how visual errors propagate through the motor system. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00