A Rare Case of Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Diagnostic Insights and Therapeutic Considerations.

OA: gold publisher-OA-unknown
Full text 5,810 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Cases

A 49-year-old perimenopausal patient with a history of diabetes managed with oral antidiabetic medication was admitted to the oncology hospital for evaluation of menometrorrhagia. On admission, clinical examination revealed a hemodynamically stable patient with good performance status (PS = 1) and no clinical signs of anemia. Vaginal examination identified a cervical mass protruding into the vaginal canal. Pelvic ultrasound revealed an endometrial thickening measuring 32 mm, along with a cystic image extending from the umbilicus, suggestive of a distended bladder. To further characterize the ultrasound findings, a pelvic MRI was performed, which demonstrated a large tumor process involving the genital tract and occupying the uterine, cervical, and vaginal lumens (Figure 1 ). The initial biopsy revealed a spindle-cell proliferation. A thoracic and abdominopelvic CT scan was performed, which showed no evidence of distant metastases. The patient underwent an enlarged colpohysterectomy, and histopathological examination, supplemented by immunohistochemistry (IHC), confirmed a diagnosis of LGESS measuring 9 cm in length. Surgical margins were negative, and there was no infiltration of the paracervical parameters (Figure 2 ). IHC demonstrated positive staining for anti-CD10, anti-desmin, anti-vimentin, anti-estrogen, and anti-progesterone antibodies (Figure 3 , Figure 4 ). The image shows a cellular proliferation arranged in sheets, predominantly composed of spindle-shaped cells. The nuclei appear enlarged with irregular contours, dense chromatin, and thickened nuclear membranes. Atypical mitotic figures are infrequent. After a discussion at a multidisciplinary consultation meeting, the patient was placed under surveillance. She has remained well-controlled, with a follow-up period of 45 months to date.

Intro

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is a rare mesenchymal tumor, accounting for 6-20% of all uterine sarcomas [ 1 ]. It primarily affects premenopausal women [ 2 ]. Diagnosis relies on histological evaluation, which must be interpreted with caution to distinguish it from other entities such as leiomyoma [ 3 ]. The standard treatment is surgical, with total hysterectomy being the mainstay of care [ 4 ]. The role of additional treatments - including lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and medical therapies such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy - remains a subject of debate [ 4 ]. Compared to other types of endometrial sarcoma, low-grade stromal sarcoma is associated with a more favorable prognosis, with an overall five-year survival rate exceeding 90% [ 2 ].

Discussion

The World Health Organization classifies endometrial stromal tumors into four histological types: endometrial stromal nodules, low-grade stromal sarcomas, high-grade stromal sarcomas, and undifferentiated sarcomas [ 5 ]. LGESS is a rare subtype, accounting for less than 1% of all endometrial cancers [ 1 ]. It most commonly affects premenopausal and perimenopausal women [ 2 ]. The uterine body and cervix are the primary sites of involvement, while the ovary is the most frequently reported extrauterine location [ 6 ]. LGESS typically follows an indolent clinical course, and distant metastases are rare [ 6 ]. Clinical symptoms, such as menometrorrhagia and pelvic pain, are nonspecific and overlap with those of other gynecological conditions, often leading to delayed diagnosis. LGESS presents a diagnostic challenge and is frequently misinterpreted as a benign lesion, such as uterine leiomyoma [ 3 ]. The differential diagnosis includes leiomyoma, adenomyosis, endometrial carcinoma, and other sarcomas [ 7 ]. Pelvic ultrasound is usually the first-line imaging modality and may reveal an irregular mass infiltrating the endometrium or myometrium, sometimes with necrotic, hemorrhagic, or cystic areas [ 8 ]. Pelvic MRI is particularly useful for evaluating uterine and ovarian lesions [ 9 ]. On MRI, LGESS may appear as a well-defined myometrial mass, an irregular lesion extending from the endometrium into the myometrium, or, less commonly, as a polypoid mass within the uterine cavity [ 10 ]. Definitive diagnosis is based on histopathological examination, which typically shows a proliferation of small, round neoplastic cells resembling proliferative-phase endometrial stromal cells [ 11 ]. Cytonuclear atypia is rare, and the proliferation index is generally low [ 11 ]. IHC usually demonstrates positivity for CD10, along with possible expression of hormone receptors, desmin, vimentin, and muscle-specific actin [ 12 ]. Molecular analysis frequently reveals the juxtaposed with another zinc finger gene 1 - suppressor of zeste 12 (JAZF1-SUZ12) fusion gene, which is the most common genetic alteration in LGESS [ 12 , 13 ]. The cornerstone of treatment is surgical resection, typically involving total hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy for stage I disease. Ovarian preservation may be considered in premenopausal women [ 2 ]. The role of adjuvant therapy, such as hormone therapy and radiotherapy, remains controversial and should be evaluated through multidisciplinary consultation, particularly for stage II-IVA disease and beyond. The benefit of these treatments in terms of survival has yet to be clearly established [ 14 ].

Conclusions

LGESS is a rare uterine malignancy with a slow-growing clinical course and the potential for late recurrence. Accurate diagnosis relies on a combination of morphological features, immunohistochemical profiling, and molecular identification of the JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion gene. Complete surgical resection remains the primary treatment, while long-term follow-up is essential due to the risk of delayed relapse. Further research into the molecular pathways involved in LGESS may help identify novel therapeutic targets and improve patient outcomes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-26T06:14:25.090378+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: publisher-OA-unknown · commercial use NOT OK · attribution required