Bidirectional regulation between circadian feeding behavior and specialized midgut clocks in Drosophila

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,642 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Feeding is a fundamental animal behavior. Increasing evidence suggests that the timing of food intake—rather than the amount or quality alone—contributes to maintaining health. Although mistimed eating can reset peripheral clocks and desynchronize them from central pacemakers to affect physiology and metabolism, how peripheral clocks can in turn shape rhythmic feeding behavior is less well understood. Here, we investigated the contribution of peripheral clocks to circadian feeding behavior in Drosophila males. Using high-resolution feeding assays combined with complementary analytical approaches that assess both rhythmicity and time-resolved dynamics, we examined the roles of distinct peripheral cell types in feeding regulation. This study reveals the involvement of midgut enteroendocrine cells (EECs) and enterocytes (ECs) in maintaining the stability and strength of feeding rhythms, whereas the fat body clock modulates baseline levels of food intake. Beyond serving as an output behavior of circadian rhythms, feeding also acts as an effective behavioral Zeitgeber that drives molecular clocks. In the absence of the dominant Zeitgeber––light––midgut oscillations decay during prolonged ad libitum feeding in constant darkness, whereas feeding/fasting cycles enable the autonomous persistence of clock oscillations in EECs but not in ECs. These findings are suggestive of regulatory feedback between midgut EECs and feeding, highlighting how timed feeding or dietary interventions could influence metabolic health via specialized gut cells. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00