Endometrioid Borderline Ovarian Tumor: Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis, and Managements

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12

This study reviewed 48 endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors, finding fertility-sparing surgery to be safe, a generally excellent prognosis with rare recurrence, and a high incidence of synchronous endometrial disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This retrospective study analyzed 48 patients with endometrioid borderline ovarian tumor (EBOT) treated in or referred to two institutions, with centralized histopathology review, to characterize clinical features, management approaches (conservative surgery vs bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), and oncologic outcomes. Most patients had stage I disease (43/48), with stromal microinvasion and intraepithelial carcinoma reported in 12% and 27% respectively; endometriosis was histologically associated in 25%, and synchronous endometrial disease was found in 24% of those evaluated. Median follow-up was 72 months, recurrence occurred in 5% after cystectomy, and no EBOT-related deaths were observed, with the authors noting that peritoneal restaging was relevant because some tumors were diagnosed at higher stage. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper reports histologic endometriosis association in 25% of EBOT cases and highlights synchronous endometrial disease in a substantial subset, though its main focus is clinical characteristics and prognosis of EBOT.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometrioid borderline ovarian tumor (EBOT) is a rare subtype of borderline ovarian malignancies. This study was designed to determine the prognosis of a series of EBOT. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with EBOT treated in or referred to our institutions and a centralized, histological review by a reference pathologist. Data on the clinical characteristics, management (surgical and medical), and oncologic outcomes of patients were required for inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified. Median age was 52 years (range 14-89). Fourteen patients underwent a conservative surgery and 32 a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (unknown in 2 cases). Two patients had bilateral tumors. Forty-three patients had stage I disease, and five patients had stage II disease (10%). Stromal microinvasion and intraepithelial carcinoma was observed in 6 (12%) and 13 (27%) patients respectively. Endometriosis was histologically associated in 12 patients (25%). Synchronous endometrial disease was found in 7 (24%) of 29 patients with endometrial histological evaluation. The median follow-up was 72 months (range 6-146). Two patients developed a recurrence after cystectomy in form of borderline disease (5%). No death related to EBOT occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal restaging surgery should be performed if not realized initially, because 5% of EBOTS are diagnosed at stage II-III. Fertility-sparing surgery seems a safe option in selected patients. Because synchronous endometrial diseases, including endometrial carcinoma are frequent, systematic hysterectomy (or endometrial sampling in case of fertility-sparing surgery) is mandatory. Prognosis is generally excellent. Recurrence is a rare event (6%), but it can occur in the form of invasive disease.
Full text 6,773 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Endometrioid borderline ovarian tumor (EBOT) is a rare subtype of borderline ovarian malignancies. This study was designed to determine the prognosis of a series of EBOT.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients with EBOT treated in or referred to our institutions and a centralized, histological review by a reference pathologist. Data on the clinical characteristics, management (surgical and medical), and oncologic outcomes of patients were required for inclusion.

Results

Forty-eight patients were identified. Median age was 52 years (range 14-89). Fourteen patients underwent a conservative surgery and 32 a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (unknown in 2 cases). Two patients had bilateral tumors. Forty-three patients had stage I disease, and five patients had stage II disease (10%). Stromal microinvasion and intraepithelial carcinoma was observed in 6 (12%) and 13 (27%) patients respectively. Endometriosis was histologically associated in 12 patients (25%). Synchronous endometrial disease was found in 7 (24%) of 29 patients with endometrial histological evaluation. The median follow-up was 72 months (range 6-146). Two patients developed a recurrence after cystectomy in form of borderline disease (5%). No death related to EBOT occurred.

Conclusions

Peritoneal restaging surgery should be performed if not realized initially, because 5% of EBOTS are diagnosed at stage II–III. Fertility-sparing surgery seems a safe option in selected patients. Because synchronous endometrial diseases, including endometrial carcinoma are frequent, systematic hysterectomy (or endometrial sampling in case of fertility-sparing surgery) is mandatory. Prognosis is generally excellent. Recurrence is a rare event (6%), but it can occur in the form of invasive disease. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs, 4th Vol. 5th edn. 2020. Fischerova D, Zikan M, Dundr P, Cibula D. Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors. Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1515–33. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0139. Uzan C, Berretta R, Rolla M, et al. Management and prognosis of endometrioid borderline tumors of the ovary. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(3):178–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2012.02.002. Bell DA, Scully RE. Atypical and borderline endometrioid adenofibromas of the ovary. A report of 27 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(3):205–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198503000-00004. Bell KA, Kurman RJ. A clinicopathologic analysis of atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(11):1465–79. Yokoyama Y, Moriya T, Takano T, et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors for recurrence in borderline ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(11):1586–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603139. Zheng JS, Ji ZJ, Yong LZ, et al. Safety and fertility outcomes after the conservative treatment of endometrioid borderline ovarian tumours. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5091-1. Nakagawa E, Abiko K, Kido A, et al. Four cases of endometrioid borderline ovarian tumour: case reports and literature review. BJR Case Rep. 2017;4(1):20170062. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20170062. Roth LM, Czernobilsky B, Langley FA. Ovarian endometrioid adenofibromatous and cystadenofibromatous tumors: benign, proliferating, and malignant. Cancer. 1981;48(8):1838–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19811015)48:8%3c1838::aid-cncr2820480822%3e3.0.co;2-r. Roth LM, Emerson RE, Ulbright TM. Ovarian endometrioid tumors of low malignant potential: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases with comparison to well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(9):1253–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200309000-00009. Russell P. The pathological assessment of ovarian neoplasms. II: The proliferating “epithelial” tumours. Pathology (Phila). 1979;11(2):251–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/00313027909061951. Snyder RR, Norris HJ, Tavassoli F. Endometrioid proliferative and low malignant potential tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12(9):661–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198809000-00002. Yüksel D, Çakır C, Kimyon Cömert G, et al. Uncommon borderline ovarian tumours: A clinicopathologic study of seventeen patients. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019;20(4):224–30. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0098. Kliman L, Rome RM, Fortune DW. Low malignant potential tumors of the ovary: a study of 76 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(3):338–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-198609000-00009. Vo TM, Duong KA, Tran LT, Bui TC. Recurrence rate and associated factors of borderline ovarian tumors in the south of Vietnam. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(10):2055–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14072. Ji H, Yliskoski M, Anttila M, Syrjänen K, Saarikoski S. Management of stage-I borderline ovarian tumors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;54(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(96)02674-4. Zhang W, Jia S, Xiang Y, Yang J, Jia C, Leng J. Comparative study of endometrioid borderline ovarian tumor with and without endometriosis. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0440-x. Ricotta G, Maulard A, Genestie C, et al. Brenner borderline ovarian tumor: a case series and literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6714–20. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09879-y. Ricotta G, Maulard A, Candiani M, et al. Clear cell borderline ovarian tumor: clinical characteristics, prognosis, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(2):1165–70. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10776-7. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions PM and SG conceived the study. SG, PM, and AM undertook surgical management. GR performed data acquisition. GR and PM performed analyses. GR and PM wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript, approved the final version, and are accountable for all aspects of the work. Corresponding author Ethics declarations The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Ricotta, G., Maulard, A., Candiani, M. et al. Endometrioid Borderline Ovarian Tumor: Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis, and Managements. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 5894–5903 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11893-7 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11893-7

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Ovarian Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-22T06:15:18.497754+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine