Evaluation and the learning curve of the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This analysis of 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies, including cases for adenomyosis and endometriosis, found that operating time decreased with experience while complication rates remained stable.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies done by one senior gynecologist to study the learning curve and complications of this technique.
METHODS: One hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies done for uterine fibroid (64%), menorrhagia (20%), adenomyosis or endometriosis (10%), cervical dysplasia (3%) and endometrial cancer (3%) were studied.
RESULTS: No conversion to laparotomy was needed. The weight of the uterus ranged from 70 to 470 grams (mean 206 g) and the operating time ranged from 45 to 245 minutes (mean 109 min). The mean operating time was reduced from 180 to 75 minutes. The uterine weight and the weight of the patient had a positive correlation to operating time. The use of automatic staplers or clips did not reduce the operating time. Ten complications occurred: one perforation of the urinary bladder, five bleedings and four pelvic infections.
CONCLUSION: The operating time was clearly shortened during the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies. The rate of the complications did not fall similarly. Technical complications (bladder perforation and intraoperative bleeding) occurred in the beginning. Complications like infection and bleeding do not seem to disappear with experience. Laparoscopic hysterectomy appears to be as safe as abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy and the postoperative convalescence time is short. It is clearly an acceptable alternative to hysterectomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:13.665691+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-27T06:17:51.937953+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine