Assessment and management of endometriosis in young people in primary care
This clinical practice article provides an update on best practices for assessing and managing endometriosis in young people up to age 25, considering patient experiences, risk factors, diagnostic methods, and first-line treatments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This clinical practice article outlines best practices for assessing and managing endometriosis in adolescents and young adults up to 25 years of age within primary care settings. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing symptoms such as severe dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and cyclical gastrointestinal or urinary issues, while cautioning against normalizing these complaints or relying on CA-125 tests for diagnosis. The authors recommend initial management with hormonal contraceptives or progesterone, reserving GnRH agonists and surgical excision for cases where medical therapy fails, alongside referrals to specialist gynecology services when necessary. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on diagnostic challenges and treatment pathways for young people presenting with suspected disease in general practice.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
9,784 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Conclusion
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-10T06:11:15.153948+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-10T06:09:21.882820+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine