[Intrauterine insemination versus programmed intercourse in cycles of controlled ovaric hyperstimulation].

Juan Carlos Barros Delgadillo; Evaristo Martínez Barrios; Christian Moreno Aburto; Mirna Souraye Godines Enríquez; Félix Manzur Navarrete; Víctor Sánchez Solís; Gerardo Barroso Villa

[Intrauterine insemination versus programmed intercourse in cycles of controlled ovaric hyperstimulation].

Juan Carlos Barros Delgadillo, Evaristo Martínez Barrios, Christian Moreno Aburto, Mirna Souraye Godines Enríquez, Félix Manzur Navarrete, Víctor Sánchez Solís, Gerardo Barroso Villa

In: Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico · 2008 · vol. 76(1) , pp. 18–31 · PMID:18798392 · W2230721606

article OA: closed CC0

View on OpenAlex View on PubMed

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproduction techniques are used more and more frequently in the treatment of coulples with infertility diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the intrauterine insemination (IUI) value in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles (COH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analytic, comparative, retrospective and longitudinal case-control study was performed. COH with IUI (group I) or with timed intercourse (TI) (group II) cycles from January 1st 2004 to December 31st 2006 were analyzed. Infertile patients aged between 24 and 42 years (group I) and between 23 and 36 years (group II) were included. The following variables were analyzed: Age, type, etiology and duration of infertility, sperm density and motility after capacitation or seminal analysis, number of total and mature follicles, endometrial thickness, gonadotropin type and dosage, insemination or TI cycle day. Pregnant vs non pregnant and pregnancies in both groups were analyzed. Results were analyzed with the STATA 7.0 and SPSS 12.0 programs. RESULTS: 873 COH+I UI cycles in 539 couples and 246 COH+ TI in 138 patients were analyzed the pregnancy rates per cycle were 13.1% and 5.2% for each group respectively. The mean woman's age was of 32.9 +/- 3.5 and 31.8 +/- 2.7 years for groups I and II respectively. There were significant differences in sperm density in both groups. The remaining variables showed no statistical differences. CONCLUSIONS: IUI versus TI do not seems to be superior with respect to the pregnancy rates in COH cycles.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (32)

A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate via openalex
Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? via openalex
Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles via openalex
The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136100 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54112-0 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49892-4 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90182-8 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58039-x via openalex
doi:10.1093/humrep/10.1.153 via openalex
doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01113.x via openalex
doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93060-m via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019244 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48384-6 via openalex
doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800115.x via openalex
doi:10.1159/000292755 via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138096 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00552-9 via openalex
doi:10.1186/1477-7827-2-55 via openalex
doi:10.1093/humrep/13.6.1553 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0020-7292(92)90699-j via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53520-1 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59825-2 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54168-5 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0020-7292(92)90257-j via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45976-5 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49647-0 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57965-5 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00534-2 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48969-7 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0020-7292(88)90288-3 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59583-1 via openalex

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-05-10T10:50:27.025119+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK

[1] The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis 1997

[2] A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate 1993

[3] Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles 1991

[4] Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? 1994