Preventing Group Privacy DisclosureThrough Synthetic Data: An Evaluation of Recommender System Methods

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study evaluated two synthetic data generation methods for group recommender systems, finding that synthetic ratings could hide individual preferences without impacting group recommendation performance.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

The paper evaluates two privacy-based methods for generating synthetic user ratings for group recommender systems, aiming to prevent group privacy disclosure while maintaining recommendation performance. The authors test multiple combinations of group recommender system design choices, including group creation strategies, group size, individual rating prediction algorithms, aggregation preferences, and then assess how these choices affect rating-prediction behavior. They report that individual preference information can be hidden without affecting group recommendation performance and that CART produces synthetic data with the least difference from the original data; they also find no significant influence of group creation strategy, group size, or individual rating prediction methods. The paper is a preprint and does not state peer-reviewed validation, and it presents results based on the evaluated recommender-system setup rather than end-to-end privacy risk estimation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, both the privacy of the data that feeds information systems and the effects of its improper handling are a matter of concern. Thus, in recommender systems, mitigating the disclosure of user privacy has become an issue of attention given the challenges that this entails. While research on algorithmic strategies to synthesize user ratings has addressed the concealment of user profiles in traditional recommender systems, less work has been done regarding the exposure of preferences and sensitive data in group recommender systems. In this paper, we evaluate two methods used to generate synthetic ratings and how they perform when applied in group recommender systems. Specifically, we apply state-of-the-art privacy-based methods in a group recommender system to introduce synthetic data and to assess whether and to what extent their behavior changes in terms of rating prediction. We performed this by exploring several possible combinations of GRS implementation (strategies used in group creation, size of groups, individual ratings prediction algorithms, preferences on aggregation methods). Our results show that it was possible to hide the information of individual preferences without affecting group recommendation performance while preserving privacy. We also found that CART was the method that synthesized data with the less difference from the original data. We do not find significative influence of strategies for group creation, group size or individual ratings prediction methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to use partially synthetic group ratings in GRS.
Full text 11,124 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Preventing Group Privacy DisclosureThrough Synthetic Data: An Evaluation of Recommender System Methods | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Preventing Group Privacy DisclosureThrough Synthetic Data: An Evaluation of Recommender System Methods Carolina Yépez, Lorena Recalde, Edison Loza-Aguirre This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Nowadays, both the privacy of the data that feeds information systems and the effects of its improper handling are a matter of concern. Thus, in recommender systems, mitigating the disclosure of user privacy has become an issue of attention given the challenges that this entails. While research on algorithmic strategies to synthesize user ratings has addressed the concealment of user profiles in traditional recommender systems, less work has been done regarding the exposure of preferences and sensitive data in group recommender systems. In this paper, we evaluate two methods used to generate synthetic ratings and how they perform when applied in group recommender systems. Specifically, we apply state-of-the-art privacy-based methods in a group recommender system to introduce synthetic data and to assess whether and to what extent their behavior changes in terms of rating prediction. We performed this by exploring several possible combinations of GRS implementation (strategies used in group creation, size of groups, individual ratings prediction algorithms, preferences on aggregation methods). Our results show that it was possible to hide the information of individual preferences without affecting group recommendation performance while preserving privacy. We also found that CART was the method that synthesized data with the less difference from the original data. We do not find significative influence of strategies for group creation, group size or individual ratings prediction methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to use partially synthetic group ratings in GRS. Group recommender systems synthetic data differential privacy CART Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1793221","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":116439442,"identity":"98840205-c8ab-47d9-9fde-ffc2f331d904","order_by":0,"name":"Carolina Yépez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Polytechnic School","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carolina","middleName":"","lastName":"Yépez","suffix":""},{"id":116439444,"identity":"ec10aed7-0e64-4b92-9024-4f3dcb6f0286","order_by":1,"name":"Lorena Recalde","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Polytechnic School","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lorena","middleName":"","lastName":"Recalde","suffix":""},{"id":116439446,"identity":"5524c9b6-8c11-466a-98cb-26bc2ff5a2d5","order_by":2,"name":"Edison Loza-Aguirre","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Polytechnic School","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Edison","middleName":"","lastName":"Loza-Aguirre","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-06-24 22:59:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":23244634,"identity":"7154e9dc-a4e6-41bf-86b5-43b2089b6f0d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-06-29 17:29:39","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1057859,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"PaperpararevistaCarolinaYepezFINAL.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1793221/v1_covered.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Preventing Group Privacy DisclosureThrough Synthetic Data: An Evaluation of Recommender System Methods","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"This preprint is available for \u003ca href='/article/rs-1793221/latest.pdf' target='_blank'\u003edownload as a PDF\u003c/a\u003e."}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Group recommender systems, synthetic data, differential privacy, CART","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eNowadays, both the privacy of the data that feeds information systems and the effects of its improper handling are a matter of concern. Thus, in recommender systems, mitigating the disclosure of user privacy has become an issue of attention given the challenges that this entails. While research on algorithmic strategies to synthesize user ratings has addressed the concealment of user profiles in traditional recommender systems, less work has been done regarding the exposure of preferences and sensitive data in group recommender systems. In this paper, we evaluate two methods used to generate synthetic ratings and how they perform when applied in group recommender systems. Specifically, we apply state-of-the-art privacy-based methods in a group recommender system to introduce synthetic data and to assess whether and to what extent their behavior changes in terms of rating prediction. We performed this by exploring several possible combinations of GRS implementation (strategies used in group creation, size of groups, individual ratings prediction algorithms, preferences on aggregation methods). Our results show that it was possible to hide the information of individual preferences without affecting group recommendation performance while preserving privacy. We also found that CART was the method that synthesized data with the less difference from the original data. We do not find significative influence of strategies for group creation, group size or individual ratings prediction methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to use partially synthetic group ratings in GRS. \u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Preventing Group Privacy DisclosureThrough Synthetic Data: An Evaluation of Recommender System Methods","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-06-29 17:29:34","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1793221/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4e661ebf-dcc1-47e7-bb39-2a72886418ad","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 29th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-06-26T04:44:13+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-06-29 17:29:34","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1793221","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1793221","identity":"rs-1793221","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00