Abstract
BACKGROUND: The question of why people engage in prosocial behaviour at a cost to themselves has long been at the heart of the debate between sociologists and personality psychologists. Both groups differ widely in their answers and offer divergent perspectives. Drawing on both perspectives, this study contributes to the debate on prosocial behaviour. METHODS: A sample of 972 anonymous online respondents and 1st-year psychology students aged 18 years and over at the University of New England were recruited in 2017 and 2018. Using structural equation modelling (SEM), we report the possible associations between resources, personality traits and prosocial behaviour and show that personality traits play a greater role in driving people to exhibit prosocial behaviour. RESULTS: In addition to their direct positive effects, personality traits mediate the effects of resources on prosocial behaviour, supporting social resource theory. We observed that age and personality traits are the most important and consistent predictors of prosocial behaviour for both men and women. Human capital was found to be positively related to prosocial behaviour in women. CONCLUSION: This study reveals the mediatory role of personality in addition to its direct effect on prosocial behaviour. Through further research, gender ideologies may help explain why the effect of resources on volunteering is gender differential.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.