⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04
· read from full text
ⓘ
The paper studies how to quantify the usefulness of raw unprocessed text for building rule-based expert systems by introducing a criterion called knowledge density. Using a prototype Python approach that generates rules from raw text, the author evaluates how many rules can be extracted from a given text and defines both global (whole-text) and local (point) knowledge density, along with an integrity/emergence criterion describing how knowledge appears in raw text. The main finding is the conceptual framework for measuring knowledge density and its related properties to assess expected rule yield from different texts. The paper presents this criterion as a method for text evaluation, but it does not provide explicit end-user performance or outcome validation within a biomedical expert system context. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Raw (unprocessed) text can serve as a source of rules for a rule-based expert system [1]. Several types of sentences from which rules can be generated have been described [2] [3], but this list is far from exhaustive. A prototype Python package for generating rules from raw text has been developed with great potential for further development [4]. Different texts yield different numbers of generated rules. The more rules that can be generated from a text, the more valuable the text is for an expert system and the greater the likelihood that the user will receive a high-quality answer from the expert system. To evaluate a text for the number of rules it contains, and therefore for its usefulness for an expert system, a criterion called knowledge density is introduced. This paper is devoted to familiarization with the knowledge density criterion. This paper describes: the knowledge density of the whole text, point or local knowledge density, text integrity or the emergence criterion of raw text, as well as various properties of the knowledge density of raw text.
Full text
6,049 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Knowledge density in raw text: a criterion for assessing the usefulness of texts for expert systems | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 9 April 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Knowledge density in raw text: a criterion for assessing the usefulness of texts for expert systems Author : Olegs Verhodubs 0000-0002-3430-0760 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177574466.69425139/v1 22 views 13 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Raw (unprocessed) text can serve as a source of rules for a rule-based expert system [1]. Several types of sentences from which rules can be generated have been described [2] [3], but this list is far from exhaustive. A prototype Python package for generating rules from raw text has been developed with great potential for further development [4]. Different texts yield different numbers of generated rules. The more rules that can be generated from a text, the more valuable the text is for an expert system and the greater the likelihood that the user will receive a high-quality answer from the expert system. To evaluate a text for the number of rules it contains, and therefore for its usefulness for an expert system, a criterion called knowledge density is introduced. This paper is devoted to familiarization with the knowledge density criterion. This paper describes: the knowledge density of the whole text, point or local knowledge density, text integrity or the emergence criterion of raw text, as well as various properties of the knowledge density of raw text. Supplementary Material File (knowledge_density.pdf) Download 226.03 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 09 April 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords expert systems knowledge knowledge density knowledge from text natural language processing rules Authors Affiliations Olegs Verhodubs 0000-0002-3430-0760 [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 22 views 13 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Olegs Verhodubs. Knowledge density in raw text: a criterion for assessing the usefulness of texts for expert systems. Authorea . 09 April 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177574466.69425139/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177574466.69425139/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe08a225ab31640',t:'MTc3OTE2Njg0Mw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.