⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03
· read from full text
ⓘ
The paper studies how predator-prey coevolution affects prey adaptation to a fluctuating environment, using a theoretical framework that combines adaptive tracking of a moving optimum with trait-matching coevolution between prey and predators. At the population level, the authors find that prey maladaptation is non-linear with predator-prey optimum divergence, differing from most earlier coevolution models, and in fluctuating environments the effect of predators on prey tracking depends on whether predators also evolve toward the moving optimum or are instead selected toward a fixed optimum. In eco-evolutionary simulations that include population size changes, phenotypically mismatched predators are reduced in size, weakening predatory selection and coevolution intensity, but the qualitative predator influence on prey adaptation remains the same. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Understanding how ecological interactions among species influence adaptation and population persistence in the face of environmental change is one of the greatest challenges for modern ecology and evolution, with important implications for conservation and other applied fields. As a ubiquitous interaction with potentially strong demographic and selective effects, predation is likely to alter how prey respond to a changing environment. However, whether and how adaptation in prey depends on the way selection operates on predators remains little understood. We investigate this question by combining the theory of adaptive tracking of a moving optimum with trait-matching predator-prey coevolution. We first show that, when coevolutionary processes emerge explicitly from interactions at the individual level, prey maladaptation in any environment does not increase linearly with the difference between the optimum phenotypes for predators and for prey, contrary to the predictions from most earlier coevolutionary models. Furthermore in a fluctuating environment, whether and how the predator evolves crucially affects how well the prey are able to track the moving optimum. Adaptive tracking in prey is facilitated when predators track the same optimum, but hampered when predators are selected towards a fixed optimum. When eco-evolutionary dynamics can occur, phenotypically mismatched predators have a reduced population size that decreases the strength of predatory selection and the intensity of coevolution, but the qualitative influence of predators on prey adaptation remains otherwise similar. Our findings highlight the importance of the evolutionary context of predators for their impacts on prey, and challenge conservation strategies based on predatory attenuation to benefit the prey.
Full text
2,788 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Understanding how ecological interactions among species influence adaptation and population persistence in the face of environmental change is one of the greatest challenges of modern ecology and evolution, with important implications for conservation and other applied fields. Predation being a ubiquitous interaction with potentially strong demographic and selective effects, it is likely to alter how prey respond to a changing environment. However, whether and how adaptation in prey depends on the way selection operates on predators remains little understood. We here investigate this question by combining the theory of adaptive tracking of a moving optimum with trait-matching predator-prey coevolution. We first show that, when scaling up individual-level processes to the population level, prey maladaptation in any environment is non-linear with respect to the divergence between the prey’s and predator’s optimum, contrary to the predictions from most earlier coevolutionary models. In a fluctuating environment, the influence of a selective predator on tracking of the moving optimum by the prey crucially depends on whether and how the predator itself evolves. In particular, a predator that tracks the same optimum facilitates adaptive tracking in prey, while a predator selected towards a fixed optimum hampers it. When eco-evolutionary dynamics are also allowed, the reduced population size of phenotypically mismatched predators decreases the strength of predatory selection and the intensity of coevolution, but the qualitative influence of predators on prey adaptation remains otherwise similar. Our findings highlight the importance of the evolutionary context of predators for their impacts on prey, and challenge conservation strategies based on predatory attenuation.
Significance statement Species in the wild face the dual challenge of adapting to changes in their physical environment and coping with detrimental interactions with other species, such as predators. While evolution by natural selection can potentially overcome both these challenges and rescue populations from extinction, this process can be complicated by interactions between predator-prey coevolution and environmental adaptation. Here, we show that the influence of predators on prey adaptation to a changing environment strongly depends on the selective scenario for the predators: adaptation in prey is facilitated if predators also need to adapt to the changing environment, but hampered if predators are either constant, or selected to be. Our results question conservation strategies based on removing predators to the benefit of prey.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Competing Interest Statement: No competing interests
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.