Clastogenesis by nucleotide lesions requires the completion of two cell cycles

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

The paper investigated how unrepaired nucleotide lesions at stalled replication forks lead to clastogenesis, using wild-type, nucleotide excision repair (NER)-deficient, and translesion synthesis (TLS)-deficient cells together with advanced cytogenetic analyses. The authors found that ssDNA tracts containing unrepaired lesions can persist through mitosis without being converted into DSBs, and only in the following S phase are they transformed into a new class of highly clastogenic DSBs, rather than DSBs at collapsed forks directly driving rearrangements. A caveat is that the mechanism was largely established in cell systems, with implications for how genome rearrangements arise in tumors rather than direct in vivo verification. The study links to disease biology by noting that prostate cancers with extensive genomic rearrangements frequently show somatic defects in NER or error-free homologous recombination-mediated DSB repair. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Damaged DNA nucleotides can trigger genome rearrangements through clastogenesis, a process driven by erroneous repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and associated with cancer development. While DSBs are known to arise from endonuclease activity at stalled replication forks, the clastogenic potential of such DSBs has remained uncertain. Here, we identify a previously unrecognized mechanism of clastogenesis using wild-type, nucleotide excision repair (NER)-deficient and translesion synthesis (TLS)-deficient cells, combined with advanced cytogenetic analyses. We demonstrate that, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tracts harboring unrepaired lesions rather than DSBs at collapsed replication forks can persist through mitosis. Only during the subsequent S phase, these tracts are converted into a new class of, highly clastogenic, DSBs. Consistent with a role of this mechanism in carcinogenesis, prostate cancers exhibiting extensive genomic rearrangements frequently harbor somatic defects in NER or in error-free homologous recombination-mediated DSB repair. These findings provide critical mechanistic insight and highlight potential implications for routine clastogenicity testing. Graphical abstract Nucleotide lesions (light blue triangle) can trigger double-strand breaks (DSBs) through endonucleolytic cleavage at stalled or reversed replication forks. Traditionally, these DSBs were assumed to drive genome rearrangements, a process termed clastogenesis. Here we describe a distinct, delayed, mechanism of clastogenesis. Thus, unreplicated nucleotide lesions within single-stranded (ss) DNA regions persist through mitosis into the next cell cycle. During the subsequent S phase, these ssDNA tracts collapse into DSBs, presumably via replication runoff. These delayed DSBs then promote extensive genomic reshuffling. Supporting this model, prostate cancers with high levels of genomic rearrangements are frequently associated with somatic defects in nucleotide excision repair (NER)—a pathway that normally prevents lesion-induced clastogenesis.
Full text 2,141 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Damaged DNA nucleotides can trigger genome rearrangements through clastogenesis, a process driven by erroneous repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and associated with cancer development. While DSBs are known to arise from endonuclease activity at stalled replication forks, the clastogenic potential of such DSBs has remained uncertain. Here, we identify a previously unrecognized mechanism of clastogenesis using wild-type, nucleotide excision repair (NER)-deficient and translesion synthesis (TLS)-deficient cells, combined with advanced cytogenetic analyses. We demonstrate that, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tracts harboring unrepaired lesions rather than DSBs at collapsed replication forks can persist through mitosis. Only during the subsequent S phase, these tracts are converted into a new class of, highly clastogenic, DSBs. Consistent with a role of this mechanism in carcinogenesis, prostate cancers exhibiting extensive genomic rearrangements frequently harbor somatic defects in NER or in error-free homologous recombination-mediated DSB repair. These findings provide critical mechanistic insight and highlight potential implications for routine clastogenicity testing. Graphical abstract Nucleotide lesions (light blue triangle) can trigger double-strand breaks (DSBs) through endonucleolytic cleavage at stalled or reversed replication forks. Traditionally, these DSBs were assumed to drive genome rearrangements, a process termed clastogenesis. Here we describe a distinct, delayed, mechanism of clastogenesis. Thus, unreplicated nucleotide lesions within single-stranded (ss) DNA regions persist through mitosis into the next cell cycle. During the subsequent S phase, these ssDNA tracts collapse into DSBs, presumably via replication runoff. These delayed DSBs then promote extensive genomic reshuffling. Supporting this model, prostate cancers with high levels of genomic rearrangements are frequently associated with somatic defects in nucleotide excision repair (NER)—a pathway that normally prevents lesion-induced clastogenesis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00