Stochastic Wiring of Cell Types Enhances Fitness by Generating Phenotypic Variability

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

The paper uses a computational model of neural wiring where genetically specified connection probabilities between discrete cell types generate stochastic connectivity, framing the model as a generalization of Bayesian neural networks. It finds that stochasticity provides a larger fitness advantage in larger networks and in variable, unpredictable environments, and that population-averaged fitness can exceed the fitness of a single “average-parameter” agent. The authors attribute this to developmental stochasticity producing non-heritable phenotypic variability that increases the chance some individuals survive under rapid environmental change, while the main limitation is that these conclusions are derived from the model rather than experimental data. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The development of neural connectivity is a crucial biological process that gives rise to diverse brain circuits and behaviors. Neural development is a stochastic process, but this stochasticity is often treated as a nuisance to overcome rather than as a functional advantage. Here we use a computational model, in which connection probabilities between discrete cell types are genetically specified, to investigate the benefits of stochasticity in the development of neural wiring. We show that this model can be viewed as a generalization of a powerful class of artificial neural networks—Bayesian neural networks—where each network parameter is a sample from a distribution. Our results reveal that stochasticity confers a greater benefit in large networks and variable environments, which may explain its role in organisms with larger brains. Surprisingly, we find that the average fitness over a population of agents is higher than a single agent defined by the average connection probability. Our model reveals how developmental stochasticity, by inducing a form of non-heritable phenotypic variability, can increase the probability that at least some individuals will survive in rapidly changing, unpredictable environments. Our results suggest how stochasticity may be an important feature rather than a bug in neural development.
Full text 1,510 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The development of neural connectivity is a crucial biological process that gives rise to diverse brain circuits and behaviors. Neural development is a stochastic process, but this stochasticity is often treated as a nuisance to overcome rather than as a functional advantage. Here we use a computational model, in which connection probabilities between discrete cell types are genetically specified, to investigate the benefits of stochasticity in the development of neural wiring. We show that this model can be viewed as a generalization of a powerful class of artificial neural networks—Bayesian neural networks—where each network parameter is a sample from a distribution. Our results reveal that stochasticity confers a greater benefit in large networks and variable environments, which may explain its role in organisms with larger brains. Surprisingly, we find that the average fitness over a population of agents is higher than a single agent defined by the average connection probability. Our model reveals how developmental stochasticity, by inducing a form of non-heritable phenotypic variability, can increase the probability that at least some individuals will survive in rapidly changing, unpredictable environments. Our results suggest how stochasticity may be an important feature rather than a bug in neural development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵† Work partially done during internship at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00