Nectar yeast scent additions fail to impact overall bouquet composition and bumble bee visitation in a montane herb

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper studied how inoculating a nectar analog of the subalpine wildflower Corydalis caseana ssp. brandegeei with the nectar yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii affects floral scent composition and bumble bee foraging behavior, using field experiments with Bombus appositus near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA). Across a flower array and a separate inoculation experiment on inflorescences, the yeast-inoculated condition showed no significant differences from sterile controls in bee visitation number, time spent per flower, or time spent accessing nectar, despite increased emissions of several volatiles associated with M. reukaufii. The authors’ explicit caveat is limited to what they tested: effects on scent bouquets and one pollinator species under their experimental inoculation conditions. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Premise of research The factors that mediate how foragers locate food supplies are of vital importance in understanding their energy acquisition and survival. Microbes that inhabit floral nectar can play outsized roles in altering nectar chemistry and nutrition, thereby affecting floral visitors. Methodology Here, we consider one such nectar microbe, the cosmopolitan, specialist nectar yeast, Metschnikowia reukaufii (Metschnikowiaceae), by inoculating a nectar analog of the subalpine wildflower, Corydalis caseana ssp. brandegeei (Fumariaceae), and then characterizing the yeast’s impacts on floral scent composition and the foraging behavior of its main pollinator, Bombus appositus (Apidae). We assessed foraging behavior of B. appositus in a flower array near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA) to test the hypothesis that foragers preferentially visit yeast-inoculated flowers over sterile controls. Additionally, we assessed whether bees spent more time at, and fed more quickly on, yeast-inoculated flowers. In a separate experiment, we tested whether Corydalis inflorescences inoculated with M. reukaufii had different scent bouquets than sterile inflorescences. Pivotal results We found that bumble bee pollinators showed no preference for the focal yeast species, with inoculated nectar having no effect on number of flowers visited, time spent on individual flowers, or time spent accessing nectar. Further, the overall scent bouquet compositions of yeast-inoculated Corydalis inflorescences were not statistically significantly different than those of sterile inflorescences, despite increased emissions of several volatiles that are known to be produced by M. reukaufii . Conclusions Our findings suggest that B. appositus does not respond to the presence of M. reukaufii in the nectar of Corydalis, and instead, yeast-associated volatile emissions may serve as a reliable cue of a nectar reward that is unused by these pollinators. These findings suggest a few avenues for future research, particularly how morphologically complex, highly scented flowers interact with VOCs produced by nectar-inhabiting microbes, and how floral visitors interpret these signals.
Full text 2,288 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Premise of research The factors that mediate how foragers locate food supplies are of vital importance in understanding their energy acquisition and survival. Microbes that inhabit floral nectar can play outsized roles in altering nectar chemistry and nutrition, thereby affecting floral visitors. Methodology Here, we consider one such nectar microbe, the cosmopolitan, specialist nectar yeast, Metschnikowia reukaufii (Metschnikowiaceae), by inoculating a nectar analog of the subalpine wildflower, Corydalis caseana ssp. brandegeei (Fumariaceae), and then characterizing the yeast’s impacts on floral scent composition and the foraging behavior of its main pollinator, Bombus appositus (Apidae). We assessed foraging behavior of B. appositus in a flower array near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA) to test the hypothesis that foragers preferentially visit yeast-inoculated flowers over sterile controls. Additionally, we assessed whether bees spent more time at, and fed more quickly on, yeast-inoculated flowers. In a separate experiment, we tested whether Corydalis inflorescences inoculated with M. reukaufii had different scent bouquets than sterile inflorescences. Pivotal results We found that bumble bee pollinators showed no preference for the focal yeast species, with inoculated nectar having no effect on number of flowers visited, time spent on individual flowers, or time spent accessing nectar. Further, the overall scent bouquet compositions of yeast-inoculated Corydalis inflorescences were not statistically significantly different than those of sterile inflorescences, despite increased emissions of several volatiles that are known to be produced by M. reukaufii.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that B. appositus does not respond to the presence of M. reukaufii in the nectar of Corydalis, and instead, yeast-associated volatile emissions may serve as a reliable cue of a nectar reward that is unused by these pollinators. These findings suggest a few avenues for future research, particularly how morphologically complex, highly scented flowers interact with VOCs produced by nectar-inhabiting microbes, and how floral visitors interpret these signals. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00