Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for Aspergillus fumigatus sensitization in adults with asthma: A retrospective study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This retrospective study developed and validated a clinical prediction model to identify Aspergillus fumigatus sensitization in 92 adult asthma patients (2023–2025) from a single hospital, using routinely available demographics and hematological biomarkers in place of Aspergillus-specific IgE testing. Candidate predictors were reduced with LASSO regression and then modeled with multivariable logistic regression, with performance assessed by ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The final model selected male sex and total IgE as retained predictors, achieving high discrimination in the training cohort (AUC 0.96; sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.92) and lower performance in validation (AUC 0.88; sensitivity 0.75; specificity 1.00), with sex-specific total IgE cutoffs producing 79.2% accuracy. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Aspergillus fumigatus sensitized asthma (AFSA) is associated with severe exacerbations and progressive lung damage, however, diagnosis remains challenging in resource-limited settings due to limited access to Aspergillus -specific IgE ( A.f- sIgE) testing. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction model using routinely available biomarkers for AFSA identification. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 92 adult asthma patients at The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City (2023–2025). Participants were classified into AFSA and non-AFSA groups. Candidate predictors (demographics and hematological parameters) were analyzed using LASSO regression, with subsequent multivariable logistic regression. Performance was validated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among 92 patients (mean age 56.5±12.8 years; 60.9% female), 44.6% (n=41) had AFSA. LASSO selected five predictors: sex, monocyte percentage, monocyte absolute count, lymphocyte percentage, and total IgE. Final model retained male sex (OR=10.688; 95%CI:1.661–152.999) and TIgE (OR=1.006; 95%CI:1.003–1.011). The model achieved excellent discrimination: training cohort (AUC=0.96, sensitivity=0.93, specificity=0.92); validation cohort (AUC=0.88, sensitivity=0.75, specificity=1.00). Sex-specific TIgE cutoffs (527.5 IU/mL [males], 906.1 IU/mL [females]) yielded 79.2% accuracy. Conclusions: The developed prediction model using gender and TIgE provides a practical, accessible tool for AFSA screening, overcoming diagnostic barriers in settings lacking A.f -sIgE testing. Its high accuracy and clinical utility support early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating timely intervention and improved outcomes in asthma management.
Full text 7,339 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for Aspergillus fumigatus sensitization in adults with asthma: A retrospective study | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 27 May 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for Aspergillus fumigatus sensitization in adults with asthma: A retrospective study Authors : Feifei Liu , Qi Tian , Shanling Yu , Chunmi Niu , and Shufeng Xu [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174833865.51801876/v1 Published Frontiers in Medicine Version of record Peer review timeline 196 views 116 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Background: Aspergillus fumigatus sensitized asthma (AFSA) is associated with severe exacerbations and progressive lung damage, however, diagnosis remains challenging in resource-limited settings due to limited access to Aspergillus -specific IgE ( A.f- sIgE) testing. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction model using routinely available biomarkers for AFSA identification. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 92 adult asthma patients at The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City (2023–2025). Participants were classified into AFSA and non-AFSA groups. Candidate predictors (demographics and hematological parameters) were analyzed using LASSO regression, with subsequent multivariable logistic regression. Performance was validated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among 92 patients (mean age 56.5±12.8 years; 60.9% female), 44.6% (n=41) had AFSA. LASSO selected five predictors: sex, monocyte percentage, monocyte absolute count, lymphocyte percentage, and total IgE. Final model retained male sex (OR=10.688; 95%CI:1.661–152.999) and TIgE (OR=1.006; 95%CI:1.003–1.011). The model achieved excellent discrimination: training cohort (AUC=0.96, sensitivity=0.93, specificity=0.92); validation cohort (AUC=0.88, sensitivity=0.75, specificity=1.00). Sex-specific TIgE cutoffs (527.5 IU/mL [males], 906.1 IU/mL [females]) yielded 79.2% accuracy. Conclusions: The developed prediction model using gender and TIgE provides a practical, accessible tool for AFSA screening, overcoming diagnostic barriers in settings lacking A.f -sIgE testing. Its high accuracy and clinical utility support early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating timely intervention and improved outcomes in asthma management. Supplementary Material File (afsa.docx) Download 566.83 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 27 May 2025 Peer review timeline Published Frontiers in Medicine Version of Record 22 Oct 2025 Published Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords abpa allergy diagnosis asthma ige Authors Affiliations Feifei Liu First Hospital of Qinhuangdao View all articles by this author Qi Tian First Hospital of Qinhuangdao View all articles by this author Shanling Yu First Hospital of Qinhuangdao View all articles by this author Chunmi Niu First Hospital of Qinhuangdao View all articles by this author Shufeng Xu [email protected] First Hospital of Qinhuangdao View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 196 views 116 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Feifei Liu, Qi Tian, Shanling Yu, et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for Aspergillus fumigatus sensitization in adults with asthma: A retrospective study. Authorea . 27 May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174833865.51801876/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.174833865.51801876/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00c359afba506f3',t:'MTc3OTYyNDc1NA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00