A Review of Counseling Research Using Single-Case Research Designs

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This content analysis reviewed 50 counseling single-case research designs published from 2015–2021, finding low adherence to quality standards and reporting guidelines, highlighting areas for improvement in methodological rigor and transparency.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Single-case research designs (SCRDs) are a vital tool for counseling researchers to evaluate intervention effectiveness and for counselors to evaluate the impact of their treatment. The purpose of this content analysis is to provide a review of the application of SCRDs in counseling to highlight knowledge accrued and gaps in the literature. We evaluated the methodological quality and reporting of SCRDs to provide guidance that will enhance the credibility of research. We included 50 SCRDs published between 2015¬–2021 across 15 journals (out of 42 reviewed). Content results showed several trends, strengths, and areas of improvement in counseling SCRDs. We found 0 studies met the What Works Clearinghouse (2022) standards and low overall adherence to the SCRIBE indicators. We discuss how counselor researchers can enhance internal validity as part of the design process and ways to enhance transparency in reporting SCRD results.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00