Birdwatchers’ attitudes and preferences that influence their decisions to engage in local, national, and international birdwatching trips

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Birdwatching tourism has significant economic potential and is a growing form of ecotourism. Birdwatchers throughout the United States have diverse attitudes and motivations, and here we sought to understand how, and why, birdwatchers select birdwatching destinations at local, in-country, and international scales. A questionnaire survey (n=427 participants) revealed that 98% participate in local birdwatching trips, 96% participate in in-country trips, and 78% participate in international trips. Among those who travel internationally, opportunities to see rare birds and well-planned itineraries were the most important factors. Moreover, hardcore birdwatchers prioritized rare species and increasing their life list, while casual birdwatchers showed interest in non-birdwatching activities and travel infrastructure. Our analysis revealed that income significantly determines the number of countries visited, with lower-income birdwatchers visiting fewer countries. The top international destinations for birdwatchers include Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico. A factor analysis illustrated distinct birdwatchers’ clusters, with some preferring tour guides and itineraries, and others preferring the presence of high bird diversity and rare birds or travel logistics. Our analysis highlights the differential and complex attitudes and preferences of U.S.-based birdwatchers and we discuss how these differences can influence the growing field of avitourism.
Full text 2,003 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Birdwatching tourism has significant economic potential and is a growing form of ecotourism. Birdwatchers throughout the United States have diverse attitudes and motivations, and here we sought to understand how, and why, birdwatchers select birdwatching destinations at local, in-country, and international scales. A questionnaire survey (n=427 participants) revealed that 98% participate in local birdwatching trips, 96% participate in in-country trips, and 78% participate in international trips. Among those who travel internationally, opportunities to see rare birds and well-planned itineraries were the most important factors. Moreover, hardcore birdwatchers prioritized rare species and increasing their life list, while casual birdwatchers showed interest in non-birdwatching activities and travel infrastructure. Our analysis revealed that income significantly determines the number of countries visited, with lower-income birdwatchers visiting fewer countries. The top international destinations for birdwatchers include Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico. A factor analysis illustrated distinct birdwatchers’ clusters, with some preferring tour guides and itineraries, and others preferring the presence of high bird diversity and rare birds or travel logistics. Our analysis highlights the differential and complex attitudes and preferences of U.S.-based birdwatchers and we discuss how these differences can influence the growing field of avitourism. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2035J Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

avitourism, avitourists, birders, birdwatching, Ecotourism, birdwatchers, birding Dates Published: 2025-08-08 08:29 Last Updated: 2025-08-08 08:29 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None. Data and Code Availability Statement: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16740540 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00