Commentary on "Global, regional, and national burden of endometriosis among women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021: a cross-sectional analysis from the 2021 global burden of disease study" [Letter]
This commentary addresses the 2021 global burden of disease study on endometriosis among women of childbearing age, with authors detailing their contributions and confirming AI use only for language tasks.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This item is a letter/commentary rather than new primary research, with authors disclosing that AI tools were used only for language tasks such as translation and improving readability. It does not provide study population, methods, results, or limitations within the text shown, and it states that AI did not contribute to substantive research activities such as study design, data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation, or conclusions. It therefore functions as commentary on the referenced Global Burden of Disease endometriosis analysis. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is a letter/commentary on a global burden estimate of endometriosis among women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
1,378 characters
· extracted from
epmc-fulltextxml
· 14 sections
· click to expand
Data
Author
Consent
Ethical
Sources
Fn Group
Research
Conflicts
Guarantor
Provenance
Declaration
Contrib Info
Associated Data
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (5)
- Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Respect to Morphological Criteria via openalex
- Global, regional, and national burden of endometriosis among women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021: a cross-sectional analysis from the 2021 global burden of disease study via openalex
- Histologic confirmation of endometriosis in different peritoneal lesions via openalex
- Morphologic Features Suggestive of Endometriosis in Nondiagnostic Peritoneal Biopsies via openalex
- Superficial Endometriosis at Ultrasound Examination-A Diagnostic Criteria Proposal via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-03T06:16:46.921020+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pmc
- last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-03T06:09:07.462733+00:00