Increased variance in second electrode accuracy during deep brain stimulation and its relationship to pneumocephalus, brain shift, and clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
Electrode accuracy during deep brain stimulation was worse on the second side implanted and in the GPi, but not related to pneumocephalus or brain shift, and did not affect clinical outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction Accurate placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes within the intended target is believed to be a key variable related to outcomes. However, methods to verify electrode location are not universally established. Research Question The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of post-op lead localisation in clinical practice and its utility to audit our own DBS accuracy. Material and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of a consecutive series of patients with Parkinson’s disease who underwent deep brain stimulation of either the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) between 2016 and 2019. Image processing was performed using the Lead-DBS toolbox. Institutional ethical approval was granted as a review of service. Results In total 38 participants met the inclusion criteria. Electrode localisation was completed in 79%. Clinical outcomes included improvement in UPDRS III of 46% and PDQ39 of 32%. Overall electrode accuracy was 0.22 +/- 0.4mm for all electrodes to the main nucleus with 9 (12%) outliers but only 3 (4%) electrodes out with 2mm from the intended target. Accuracy was worse for the second electrode implanted and in the GPi but was not affected by pneumocephalus or brain shift. Neither clinical outcomes nor the volume of activated tissue was affected by electrode accuracy. Discussion and Conclusions A neuroimaging approach to electrode localisation allows qualitative appraisal of targeting accuracy and is feasible with routine clinical data. Such methods are complimentary to traditional co-ordinate approaches and lend themselves to developing large, collaborative, and quantitative projects. HIGHLIGHTS Overall electrode accuracy was 0.22 +/- 0.4mm with only 3 (4%) electrodes out with 2mm from the intended target Accuracy was significantly worse in the GPi versus the STN and on the second side implanted Inaccuracy occurred in the X (lateral) plane but was not related to pneumocephalus or brain shift
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00