Forest Plant Diversity Assessment Based on Remote Sensing: A Systematic Literature Review

Forest Plant Diversity Assessment Based on Remote Sensing: A Systematic Literature Review | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Forest Plant Diversity Assessment Based on Remote Sensing: A Systematic Literature Review Zelalem Teshager, Teshome Soromessa This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This document presents a systematic literature review on the assessment of forest plant diversity using remote sensing techniques. Forest plant diversity plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem stability and providing essential services. However, human activities pose significant threats to biodiversity, necessitating effective monitoring and conservation efforts. Forest biodiversity monitoring provides evidence-based data for conservation programs and decision-making. Traditional methods of biodiversity assessment have limitations in terms of cost, time, and spatial coverage. Remote sensing data, on the other hand, offers a flexible and cost-effective approach to monitor forest species diversity, explore diversity-productivity relationships, and identify biodiversity hotspots. This review paper highlights various approaches to assess forest plant diversity, with a focus on remote sensing techniques. The benefits and drawbacks of remote sensing in biodiversity assessment are discussed, along with the use of Earth Observation satellite images, LiDAR data, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for mapping vegetation biodiversity. The document presents case studies showcasing the monitoring of forest diversity parameters across different ecosystems using remote sensing. It analyzes the temporal trend of publications, publishers, and authors in this field, along with the spatial analysis of study regions. Furthermore, the review discusses challenges and limitations of remote sensing in forest plant diversity monitoring and identifies research areas for improving its accuracy. Overall, this systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment of forest plant diversity based on remote sensing. It emphasizes the importance of remote sensing in conservation efforts, highlights the advancements in technology, and identifies future research directions to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of remote sensing approaches in biodiversity monitoring. Forestry Conservation Biology Forest plant diversity Remote sensing Systematic literature review Biodiversity monitoring conservation Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 1 Introduction Biodiversity refers to the variety of living organisms, including plants, animals, and microorganisms, as well as the genes they contain and the ecosystems they form [ 1 ]. It encompasses different dimensions such as species diversity, genetic diversity, spatial diversity, and functional diversity [ 2 ]. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in ecological systems by contributing to ecosystem stability, resilience, and functioning over time [ 3 ]. It provides essential services such as food production, water purification, climate regulation, and nutrient cycling. Biodiversity also supports sustainable development and human well-being, as it underpins various aspects of our lives, including agriculture, medicine, and cultural values [ 4 ]. Plant diversity is a crucial factor in preserving the stability, services, and functions of forest ecosystems [ 5 ]. However, human activities, such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, pose significant threats to biodiversity, leading to species extinction, disruption of ecological processes, endangers essential ecosystem services, and risks unacceptable environmental consequences [ 6 ]. Protecting and conserving biodiversity is crucial for maintaining the health and functioning of ecosystems and ensuring the long-term survival of both human and non-human species. Biodiversity monitoring is crucial for conservation efforts and decision-making. Yang et al. [ 5 ] noticed that for the purpose of managing and conserving forest resources, it is essential to precisely and promptly monitor large-scale wall-to-wall maps of plant variety and its spatial heterogeneity. Chapman et al. [ 7 ] and Moersberger et al. [ 8 ] also agreed that biodiversity monitoring provides evidence-based data to assess the state of biodiversity, evaluate conservation programs, and inform policy-making. Monitoring efforts, however, face challenges such as gaps in taxonomy, spatial coverage, and temporal resolution, resulting in fragmented and disconnected data [ 8 , 9 ]. To address these challenges, it is important to enhance capacity for biodiversity monitoring, especially in high-biodiversity countries with data gaps [ 10 ].The usual biodiversity monitoring method is typically an expensive, time-consuming,and labor-intensive endeavor with time and space limitations [ 11 ]. Thus, according to Stephenson et al. [ 10 ], stakeholders need to improve biodiversity monitoring by following best monitoring practices, adopting appropriate indicators, and making data openly available to enhance results-based management, conserve biodiversity, and sustain ecosystem services. Hansen et al. also stated that integrated, continuous, and accurate quantitative biodiversity assessments are necessary to mitigate the current rates of biodiversity loss [ 12 ]. Remote sensing data has significantly contributed to biodiversity research and conservation by providing unique and information-rich data, offering a flexible and cost-effective method for monitoring forest species diversity, exploring diversity-productivity relationships, identifying biodiversity hotspots, and facilitating planning and monitoring in forest resource management at various scales [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. As showed by Kerry et al. [ 18 ], more advanced monitoring techniques, like geographic information systems and remote sensing, make biodiversity conservation and restoration monitoring easier. According to Nico et al. [ 19 ], advanced methods of assessing forest plant diversity include the use of Earth Observation satellite images to map vegetation biodiversity and compute vegetation indices and SAR products. Another method involves combining vertical structure information and multi-temporal phenological characteristics using LiDAR data and optical images to estimate forest diversity indices [ 20 ]. Probabilistic and preferential sampling approaches can be used to document community diversity, with the probabilistic approach performing better in estimating species richness and diversity of species assemblages, while the preferential approach outperforms in detecting forest-specialist species and plant diversity hotspots [ 21 ]. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology can also be used, with the spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification approach providing more accurate monitoring of forest diversity indices, while the self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithm can acquire forest diversity patterns rapidly [ 22 ]. Systematic sampling can be employed to collect vegetation data and assess woody plant species diversity, along with recording environmental variables and conducting ranking exercises [ 23 ]. This review paper aims to present an extensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment based on remote sensing. The various approaches to assessing forest plant diversity are highlighted, especially the use of remote sensing techniques. Their benefits and drawbacks are also discussed, along with the number of publications by year, publishers, and authors, the spatial analysis of the study regions, as well as the sensors that were used. Finally, prospective research directions for remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring are reviewed, as well as challenges and research areas that improve the accuracy of remote sensing approaches. 2 Review structure The review is structured into several key sections to provide a comprehensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment using remote sensing techniques. The introduction discusses the definition and significance of biodiversity in ecological systems, emphasizing the importance of evaluating forest biodiversity and the methodologies for measuring plant diversity, particularly through remote sensing. The research method section outlines the literature databases and keywords used to identify relevant articles, detailing the literature selection process. The results and discussion section is organized into several subsections: first, it provides a general overview of forest plant diversity and potential threats; then, it analyzes traditional methods, geographical information systems (GIS), and remote sensing techniques, highlighting their benefits and drawbacks for assessing and conserving forest plant diversity. This section also reviews biodiversity parameters and indicators used in remote sensing-based assessments, along with case studies demonstrating monitoring efforts across various ecosystems. Subsequently, the analysis includes the temporal trends in publications, identifying patterns among publishers and authors, as well as conducting a spatial analysis of study regions. The review culminates in a summary of remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring, outlining challenges and prospective research directions to improve accuracy and effectiveness in biodiversity assessments. 3 Methods To conduct a systematic review aimed at evaluating forest plant diversity using remote sensing, the following procedures were followed. Firstly, research questions aligned with the general objective were defined, including inquiries about potential biodiversity threats, the current state of research on remote sensing-based forest diversity evaluation, advanced assessment techniques, biodiversity parameters and indicators for remote sensing-based monitoring, and the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of remote sensing techniques for forest plant diversity monitoring. Secondly, a literature search strategy was carried out using databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Scopus between February 22, 2024, and March 8, 2024. This involved specific keywords related to biodiversity and remote sensing, such as "remote sensing" AND ("forest diversity" OR "plant diversity" OR "biodiversity") (Fig. 1 ). Thirdly, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select relevant publications based on the review's objectives, publication date, language, study design, and geographic relevance. Fourthly, a screening and selection process was conducted, resulting in 92 pertinent publications published between 2012 and 2024 being chosen for analysis. Fifthly, the extracted data was synthesized and analyzed to identify patterns and trends in remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment studies across different ecosystems and to address the research questions. Sixthly, the findings of the reviewed studies were interpreted and discussed in relation to the general objective of the review. Seventhly, the key findings and conclusions of the systematic review were summarized, and the implications for forest assessment, management, conservation, and future research directions were discussed. Finally, a well-structured systematic review report was prepared following the guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting standard. The process of selecting, evaluating, and reviewing articles is illustrated in the flowchart below (Fig. 2 ). 4 Results and Discussion 4.1 Comprehensive overview of reviewed publications 4.1.1 Temporal Trend Analysis of Remote Sensing-Based Forest Diversity Assessment Literature The discipline's advancement and growth can be understood by examining the published literature's trend on remote sensing-based forest plant diversity evaluation throughout time. Research directions, new topics, and trends can be identified by keeping track of the number of publications produced annually. It aids scholars in comprehending shifts in involvement and enthusiasm for this area. Keeping an eye on publication changes also helps to spot important developments or turning moments. It draws attention to growing research efforts, improvements in methodology or technology, and research deficiencies. Through this study, researchers can assess the significance of their work, pinpoint areas that require more research, and promote cooperation. This trend study offers decision-makers and practitioners in remote sensing-based evaluations a thorough grasp of the state of the field, its obstacles, and its future orientations. With regard to this review paper, Fig. 3 illustrates an increase in the total number of publications per year between 2012 and 2024, reaching a peak of 36 articles in 2023. More than 83% of all articles have been published since 2021, even though 2024 did not finish until the last access to the literature databases. This highlights the growing number of recent publications. Papers searched from 2013 to 2015 were not chosen for analysis as they did not meet the review's requirements or objectives, making their inclusion irrelevant. 4.1.2 Analysis of publications by paper type Assessing the distribution of published papers among various types of papers allows for the analysis of scholarly contributions. Research articles advance knowledge by presenting novel conclusions and approaches. Review articles summarize the body of knowledge, noting gaps and potential future research areas. Books address a wide range of topics in great detail. Editorials provide knowledgeable viewpoints on pertinent subjects, igniting conversation. Perspective pieces contribute to larger discussions by providing individual points of view. Other types consist of brief correspondence, case studies, articles, and letters. Research priorities and dissemination tactics are influenced by the trends, variety, and gaps in the literature that are identified by this study, which also provides information to publishers, funders, and researchers. As shown in Fig. 4 , the research article paper type has the highest number of articles (69 publications), followed by reviews (18 publications) and books (4 publications). The majority of publications (more than 91% of articles) are reviews and research articles. 4.1.3 Comparative Analysis of Literature Across Journals Evaluating the literature on forest plant diversity monitoring using remote sensing is essential to knowing the state of the field and identifying reputable journals. Distribution and significance in this discipline are revealed by comparison of published articles. It assesses recognition, involvement, and interest in particular journals. Variations promote prestigious publications to help academics keep current and submit their work. The evaluation points up gaps, which directs additional study and motivates attention to fill them. It measures broadness and depth, giving a summary and emphasizing key journals that have shaped knowledge. Overall, there are 48 journals that have published articles on the review's topic. Books, student theses, and yearly conferences like the EGU General Assembly are among the other publications covered in this review article. Almost all of these materials are indexed in databases that focus on books, theses, and conference proceedings, including Scopus or the Conference Proceedings Citation Index. The scientific community benefits from increased visibility and discoverability of conference abstracts and presentations because of this indexing. The rest of the files in this review are preprints, which are academic articles or research manuscripts that are made available to the public before public scrutiny by peers and publication in a typical journal. Preprint servers, websites that facilitate the dissemination of research findings among scientists, are usually where preprints are posted. The following list includes the top six journals where more than two papers have been published. Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between journal names and the number of published articles, revealing publishing trends and differences among journals. The y-axis represents journal names, while the x-axis shows the number of articles. Notably, journals like the Remote Sensing Journal, with 14 publications, and the Forests Journal, with 5, indicate active engagement and broader author reach. In contrast, more specialized journals, such as the Conservation Biology Journal with only 2 publications, focus on high-quality, niche research. The graph also highlights clusters of journals with similar publication volumes and outliers with disproportionately high or low article counts. However, the graph alone does not fully assess journal quality; it should be evaluated alongside factors such as reputation, peer review processes, indexing, and citation metrics. Ultimately, this analysis indicates that the journals highlighted in the review maintain high quality and significantly impact the assessment of forest plant diversity through remote sensing. 4.1.4 Number of publications per publisher companies The total number of publisher companies related to the topic of the review is 31. The top seven publisher organizations are listed below, along with the number of articles each publisher organization has published. As Fig. 6 illustrates, the number of publications that each publisher has published has been evaluated in this review work. As a result, out of the total articles published, MDPI Academic Publishing Company has published the majority (28 articles) of the publications, followed by Wiley (13 articles), and Springer Nature (11 articles), and Elsevier (6 articles). 4.1.5 Publications across country and continent Analyzing the spatial trends in remote sensing-based forest plant diversity literature reveals the distribution and research productivity across continents and nations, highlighting regions of strong research output and areas needing more work or funding. Higher publication rates in continents like Europe and North America, particularly in specific countries, suggest potential for collaboration, while regions with fewer publications indicate unexplored research topics. This helps guide financing, research, and conservation initiatives in the future. Thus, this analysis offers a broad picture that directs future research objectives and field collaborations. The review indicates that papers related to forest plant diversity have been published across six continents. Europe leads with 44 publications, followed by Asia with 25 articles, North America with 12, and Africa with 6. This shows a strong focus in Europe, while other continents exhibit varying levels of research output, with South America and Australia having the fewest publications. The literature on remote sensing of forest biodiversity has been published from 39 different nations. Figure 7 displays the countries where more than two articles have been published. Accordingly, India (9 publications), China (8 publications), and Italy (7 publications) are the research area countries with the most publications, followed by Germany and the United States of America (6 publications each). 4.1.6 Publications by forest type Tropical forests, located near the equator in regions like Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, are the hottest and rainiest forests, known for their high biodiversity, including species like the African forest elephant. They face severe threats from deforestation and poaching [ 24 ]. Boreal forests, or taiga, found in northern Asia, Europe, and North America, endure harsh winters and have lower biodiversity. Dominated by conifers and acidic soils, these forests are crucial carbon sinks but are threatened by climate change and habitat loss affecting species like the boreal caribou [ 25 ]. Temperate forests, found in mid-latitude regions such as eastern North America, experience four seasons and contain a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees. These fertile forests support diverse wildlife but face habitat loss, endangering species like the northern spotted owl and red wolf [ 26 ]. According to this review work, the majority of examined articles associated with forest plant diversity monitoring take place in temperate forests (61%), with tropical forests coming in second (22%), and boreal forests coming in third (17%) (Fig. 8 ). 4.1.7 Publications across remote sensing sensors About 47% of all sensor platform used in the reviewed studies are Space-borne (Orbital) sensor platform, whereas the remaining 53% are Airborne (Suborbital) Sensors platform, emphasizing the focus on airborne sensor platform diversity to estimate forest biodiversity. About 50% of all the sensor types used in the reviewed studies are active remote sensing sensors. Passive sensors also constitute about 50% of all the sensors (Table 1 ). As demonstrated in Table 1 , Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), which constitutes 27% is the most widely used remote sensing technology in the reviewed literature, followed by Sentinel-2 MSI (21%), Airborne laser scanning(ALS) (11%), Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (18%), and Rapid eye, SPOT, and IKONOS (each making up 2%). 4.1.8 Publications per method used Based on the findings of the literature analysis, the majority of papers (72%) use only sensors to assess the diversity of forest plants. This is followed by the use of sensors and field surveys (15%), sensors and machine learning/algorithms (11%), and sensors and GIS (2%) as noticed in Fig. 9 . An overview of the methodologies and sensor types used to measure the variety of forest plants is given in Fig. 9 , which will help to clarify the role played by satellite and aircraft remote sensing as well as fieldwork in validating the results of remotely sensed data. While the field survey method (15%) was not included in the majority of reviewed studies, other researchers, such as Kacic & Kuenzer [ 27 ], have reaffirmed that a field survey ought to be included in these kinds of papers because it is essential for validating all sensor data. 4.2 Forest plant diversity and potential threats Forest plant diversity is an important aspect of ecosystem functioning and conservation. Several studies have investigated plant diversity in different forest ecosystems and identified potential threats to this diversity. For example, studies in mountainous ecosystems have found that deforestation is a major threat to forest cover change and woody plant species diversity [ 23 ]. In forest ecosystems, there has been a focus on studying tree diversity, but recent research has highlighted the importance of studying herbaceous plant diversity as well [ 28 ]. Fragmentation of forest habitats is another major threat to plant diversity, as it leads to the loss of suitable habitats for forest specialists and facilitates the invasion of alien species [ 29 ]. Additionally, human activities such as land-use change, selective logging, and climate change are impacting forest plant communities and their diversity [ 30 , 31 ]. Overall, understanding and addressing these threats is crucial for the conservation and management of forest plant diversity. 4.3 The methods used for monitoring forest biodiversity Monitoring forest plant biodiversity can be done using various methods, including traditional and advanced techniques. Traditional methods involve field measurements and direct observation of plant species richness and diversity [ 14 , 19 ]. Advanced methods utilize remote sensing technology, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellite imagery, to assess vegetation biodiversity [ 32 , 33 , 27 ]. These methods can provide valuable information on species composition, abundance, and distribution across different spatial and temporal scales. For example, UAV remote sensing can be used to estimate forest species diversity indices by classifying spectral data or clustering biochemical and structural features. Remote sensing sensors, such as multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, are commonly used to analyze spectral diversity and vegetation indices as proxies for forest biodiversity. These advanced methods offer the advantage of large-scale monitoring and the ability to detect changes in habitat quality and species diversity over time. Traditional forest plant diversity assessment encompasses a range of methodological approaches that have been fundamental in understanding forest ecosystems. These methods include measuring tree species richness through distance sampling from community nuclei [ 34 ], implementing quadrat surveys in agroforestry systems [ 35 ], and conducting surveys and interviews with local healers to document medicinal plant diversity [ 36 ]. However, traditional assessment methods face significant limitations despite their benefits. While these approaches effectively document specific threats like hunting and invasive species that might be missed by remote sensing alone [ 37 ], they are often time-consuming and require specialized expertise. As noted by Mammides et al. [ 38 ], traditional morphological proxies for taxon identification necessitate trained botanists and vegetation scientists, which limits the seasonal scope of monitoring activities. Pascher et al. [ 39 ] highlight that these conventional methods may fail to capture the complete temporal and spatial resolution of biodiversity, particularly in detecting rare or elusive taxa. The evolution of assessment methods in conservation has led to innovative solutions that effectively address existing limitations, particularly through the integration of remote sensing (RS) technologies with environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis. This combination marks a significant advancement in monitoring strategies, enhancing our ability to link habitat characteristics with species distribution, as highlighted by studies from Ariza et al. [ 40 ] and Capurso et al. [ 41 ]. Emerging technologies show great potential to supplement or even replace traditional monitoring approaches while preserving the valuable aspects of conventional methods. This integration suggests a promising future where comprehensive assessments of forest plant diversity harness the strengths of both modern and traditional techniques, ultimately enhancing the conservation and management of forest resources. Early adoption of remote sensing technology—especially through Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 MSI imagery—combined with ground-truthing data has significantly broadened the spatial scope of these assessments [ 5 ]. Furthermore, these methods have proven invaluable in fostering stakeholder cooperation, facilitating real-time species identification, and documenting essential information about growth forms, phenology, and ecological interactions, enriching our understanding of forest ecosystems and empowering more effective conservation efforts. The advanced techniques of forest plant diversity assessment are illustrated in detail below. Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques have been used to assess and monitor forest plant diversity. Krigas et al. [ 42 ] and Salehi and Ahmadian [ 43 ] confirmed that Geographic information systems (GIS) are widely used to analyze potential and actual spatial-temporal distribution, location, distribution patterns, population assessment, and the identification of priority regions for management and conservation. These techniques involve the use of satellite remote sensing data, such as Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images, to map and predict plant diversity over large forest areas. Machine learning models, including Random Forests (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), have been applied to analyze the spectral and radar data from these satellite images and accurately predict forest tree species diversity [ 44 , 5 ]. Additionally, GIS technology has been used to map the distribution of invasive species and track their spread, using remote sensing data such as NDVI indices and radiometric space data from Sentinel-1 [ 19 ]. These techniques provide valuable information for the conservation and management of forest resources, allowing for the identification of critical habitats and the development of conservation plans [ 45 , 46 ]. For some species, ecological niche models have currently been developed and mapped using soil, bioclimatic, topographic, and land use factors [ 18 , 47 ]. Nevertheless, GIS has several drawbacks, including expensive software and hardware, the inability to capture GIS data, and challenges in using it [ 48 ]. Remote sensing has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring and assessing forest biodiversity, offering spatial and temporal observations at various scales with cost-effective and flexible approaches [ 14 ]. The technology encompasses multiple platforms and methods, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors for estimating forest species diversity indices [ 49 , 50 ]. Advanced classification methods, such as the spectral angle mapper (SAM) approach, enable accurate predictions of species richness and Shannon-Wiener index through spectral information analysis at the individual canopy scale [ 16 ]. The integration of multiple data sources, including Sentinel-2 mission data with its spectral bands and photosynthetic indices time series, has enhanced biodiversity assessment capabilities [ 44 ]. Machine learning applications, particularly Random Forests and Deep Neural Networks, have further improved the analysis of multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 imagery for predicting forest tree species diversity [ 15 ]. Remote sensing offers substantial benefits for forest biodiversity monitoring, significantly enhancing research and conservation efforts with unique, information-rich insights [ 13 ]. It provides a flexible and cost-effective method for gathering data on forest species diversity indices, such as species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index [ 14 ]. Additionally, it facilitates the integration of ground-based surveys, airborne laser scanning, and imaging spectroscopy, enabling researchers to explore functional diversity-productivity relationships at various spatial scales [ 15 ]. Moreover, data from remote sensing, particularly from sensors like Sentinel-2, can derive reliable proxies for biological diversity, aiding in the identification of potential biodiversity hotspots and supporting cost-effective monitoring and forest management [ 16 ]. Lastly, remote sensing data, including multispectral imagery and synthetic aperture radar, allows for the extrapolation of forest resource models over large areas, supporting strategic, tactical, and operational planning in forest resource management [ 17 ]. However, significant challenges persist in the application of remote sensing for forest diversity monitoring. Fassnacht et al. [ 51 ] identified the scale- and ecosystem-dependent relationship between spectral heterogeneity and tree species diversity as a major obstacle in mapping forest diversity over large and mixed forest areas. The requirement for extensive field surveys to support multi-taxonomic studies remains a significant limitation [ 44 ]. Technical challenges include variations in accuracy depending on the chosen method; while classification methods based on spectral information at individual canopy scale provide higher accuracy, they demand intensive data collection and processing [ 16 ]. The clustering method, though faster in acquiring forest diversity patterns, may introduce uncertainties [ 14 ]. Lines et al. [ 52 ] emphasize the need for standardized approaches and benchmarking datasets to enhance the reliability and efficiency of remote sensing applications in forest diversity monitoring. Remote sensing techniques commonly used for biodiversity assessment include satellite imagery, LiDAR, hyperspectral imaging, radar imagery, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These techniques provide valuable information for monitoring and assessing biodiversity at different spatial and temporal scales. Satellite systems specifically designed for global biodiversity assessment and monitoring are being launched, and they combine remote sensing with ground observations to develop reliable and interpretable products [ 53 ]. Multispectral imaging technology from commercially available UAVs has been used to estimate biodiversity metrics at a fine spatial resolution, reducing sampling time and providing high-resolution monitoring [ 104 ]. Spaceborne and airborne sensors provide information at unprecedented spatial resolutions, allowing for the study of functional diversity changes over different scales [ 54 ]. Additionally, remote monitoring methods, including AI and machine learning algorithms, are being used to enhance the efficiency of current techniques for biodiversity conservation and monitoring [ 55 ]. Satellite imagery techniques for forest plant diversity assessment involve using multispectral, hyperspectral, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images to map vegetation biodiversity [ 19 ]. These images facilitate the computation of various vegetation indices and SAR products, which are analyzed through abundance-based metrics and agent-based models to quantify biodiversity [ 44 ]. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Networks, utilize multi-temporal satellite images to predict forest tree species diversity [ 56 ]. Neural network approaches enhance tree species classification by adjusting markup and improving sampling techniques (Muise et al., 2022). Additionally, remote sensing data assess the representation of protected areas by examining topography, forest disturbances, and structural attributes [ 16 ]. The Sentinel-2 mission shows great potential in producing reliable proxies for biological diversity in forest ecosystems. Satellite imagery provides advantages, such as accurately predicting forest tree species diversity using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and − 2 images, achieving average accuracies of 78% for indices like Simpson, Shannon, and Pielou [ 56 , 44 ], and enabling regular monitoring through current Earth Observation missions [ 19 ]. However, it also presents challenges; forestry applications require automatic markup adjustments and improved sampling techniques for enhanced tree species classification [ 16 ]. Moreover, there is a lack of studies combining vertical structure information and multi-temporal phenological characteristics to quantify diversity in large, heterogeneous forest areas [ 57 ]. LiDAR is a key remote sensing technique for mapping biodiversity, offering precise insights into the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem structure [ 58 ]. It monitors vital biodiversity variables such as community composition, vegetation structure, and canopy diversity from space [ 13 ]. Drones equipped with LiDAR facilitate automated large-area scanning, producing accurate 3D images [ 59 ] and estimating local biodiversity across various habitats, correlating well with important biodiversity drivers [ 60 ]. LiDAR has several advantages, including capturing historical land use impacts, aiding in understanding biotic responses to environmental changes [ 61 ], and providing valuable insights into understorey plant composition [ 62 ]. It's also useful for assessing forest conservation status in biodiversity-rich areas [ 63 ] and enhancing habitat mapping [ 64 ]. However, LiDAR presents challenges, such as high costs and time-consuming data processing requiring specialized expertise [ 58 ], and it may struggle in dense vegetation or complex terrains, affecting accuracy. Despite these limitations, LiDAR remains a valuable tool for understanding and conserving ecosystems. Hyperspectral imaging techniques are increasingly used for assessing forest plant diversity, providing a flexible and cost-effective solution for large-scale biodiversity monitoring [ 14 , 19 , 65 ]. UAVs equipped with hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors can estimate forest species diversity indices [ 27 ]. Methods such as spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification and self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering have been compared [ 66 ], with the former showing better performance in predicting species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index [ 67 ]. Conversely, clustering methods utilize biochemical and structural features to quickly identify forest diversity patterns without specifying tree species. Hyperspectral imaging also analyzes plant phenology and soil-vegetation interactions through various vegetation indices [ 68 ]. Statistical techniques, like analysis of variance and random forests, help differentiate invasive and weed species in agrocenoses [ 69 ]. Airborne remote sensing, including passive hyperspectral and active LiDAR data, maps biodiversity patterns across forest biomes [ 70 ]. Machine learning algorithms, such as Gaussian processes regression, show promise in estimating forest biophysical parameters like leaf area index (LAI) using hyperspectral data [ 67 ]. Despite its advantages, hyperspectral imaging has limitations. While hyperspectral imaging can identify invasive species and quantify biodiversity effects on stem biomass and canopy nitrogen (67], which are crucial for understanding plant growth [ 71 ], it relies on technologically challenging spectral and spatially resolved measurements [ 72 ]. Additionally, processing hyperspectral data requires specialized analysis methods. Radar imagery remote sensing techniques have been effectively used to assess forest plant diversity, demonstrating sensitivity comparable to airborne laser scanning (ALS) in measuring forest structure [ 5 ]. Studies utilizing Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data achieved overall accuracies of 67.4% for Simpson diversity and 64.2% for Shannon-Wiener diversity in a subtropical forest. Nico et al., [ 19 ] mapped vegetation biodiversity in Southern Italian National Parks using multispectral, hyperspectral, and SAR satellite images along with abundance-based metrics and an agent-based model [ 73 ]. Additional research found that higher tree height variation correlates with increased tree species diversity [ 103 ], while combining GEDI LiDAR data with Sentinel-2 imagery identified foliage height diversity and spectral bands as key variables for diversity estimation [ 19 ]. Nico et al. [ 19 ] mapped vegetation biodiversity in Southern Italian National Parks using multispectral, hyperspectral, and SAR satellite images along with abundance-based metrics and an agent-based model [ 73 ]. These findings illustrate the effectiveness of radar techniques in biodiversity mapping. Radar methods offer advantages, such as providing accurate plant diversity information over large areas and performing well in habitat structure assessment [ 74 ]. They also hold promise in predicting species composition for birds and saproxylic beetles [ 75 ] and calculating forest functional diversity [ 16 ]. However, limitations include lower accuracy in predicting diversity indices like Simpson and Shannon-Wiener compared to spectral data [ 5 ], and the need for machine learning algorithms to link radar data to ground-truthing indices, which can be computationally intensive [ 19 ]. Additionally, radar may provide less information on plant phenology compared to other remote sensing sources [ 66 ]. These challenges necessitate complementary data sources and careful consideration of objectives in forest plant diversity assessments using radar data. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for assessing forest plant biodiversity offers multiple benefits, including cost-effectiveness and the ability to navigate challenging terrain [ 76 ]. AVs can monitor wildlife poaching, illegal timber extraction, and track forest regeneration or degradation [ 22 ]. They also enable accurate monitoring of forest diversity indices, such as species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index, through hyperspectral and LiDAR data [ 77 ]. Combining multi-rotor and fixed-wing UAV imagery allows for precise mapping of tree species in complex environments [ 78 ]. However, UAVs face challenges, such as reliance on GPS navigation, which is inadequate under forest canopies [22, 75, 79, 80). Additionally, using clustering algorithms for estimating diversity indices can introduce uncertainties, as they may not accurately capture specific tree species [ 81 ]. UAV assessments often require spectral data from all dominant tree species at an individual canopy scale, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. These limitations underscore the need for further research to enhance UAV-based biodiversity assessments. Despite these challenges, UAVs hold significant potential for monitoring forest plant biodiversity, especially amid increasing climate change impacts. The following figure (Fig. 10 ) illustrates the integration of remote sensing technologies and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for analyzing forest distribution and biodiversity, specifically focusing on forest plant diversity. It distinguishes between passive remote sensing methods, such as satellite imagery, and active methods, like laser scanning (LiDAR). The process combines data from various sources, including ground-based measurements and drone-based LiDAR systems, to create detailed digital terrain models (DTMs) and 3D point clouds. The GIS component supports data management and spatial analysis, incorporating various data layers (e.g., land cover, wetlands). Precise geolocation through GPS and inertial measurement units (IMUs) is emphasized for accurate mapping and analysis. Overall, the figure highlights a comprehensive approach to monitoring and managing forest ecosystems using advanced technology. The figure is adapted from Kerry et al. [ 18 ]. Abbreviations: FP-mode, first-pulse mode; LP-mode, last-pulse mode; DEM, digital elevation model; DTM, digital terrain model. To sum up, monitoring forest plant biodiversity involves traditional and advanced techniques, summarized in Table 2 , which compares these methods based on their characteristics, advantages, and limitations. The choice between traditional and advanced methods depends on the specific objectives of the monitoring effort, available resources, and the scale of the study. Table 2 A Summary of Traditional vs. Advanced Methods for Monitoring Forest Plant diversity Method Type Method Characteristics Advantages Limitations Traditional Field Surveys Direct observation and measurement of plant species richness and diversity. - Encourages stakeholder cooperation - Real-time species identification - Time-consuming - Requires trained botanists Quadrat Surveys Sampling method to assess species composition in defined areas. - Detailed local data collection - Limited spatial coverage - May miss rare species Interviews with Local Healers Gathering knowledge on medicinal plant diversity from community members. - Provides cultural insights into plant use - Subjective data; may not be comprehensive Advanced Remote Sensing (UAVs, Satellites) Use of aerial imagery and satellite data to assess vegetation biodiversity. - Large-scale monitoring - Cost-effective and flexible - May miss ground-level details - Requires technical expertise LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging for mapping vegetation structure and biodiversity. - High-resolution 3D data - Effective in dense forests - Expensive and complex data processing Hyperspectral Imaging Captures detailed spectral information to identify plant species and health. - Can differentiate between species - Useful for assessing ecosystem functions - Requires specialized equipment and analysis Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyzes spatial data to map and predict plant diversity. - Integrates various data sources - Identifies priority conservation areas - High costs for software and hardware Machine Learning Models Algorithms used to analyze remote sensing data for predicting species diversity. - Enhances predictive accuracy - Can process large datasets efficiently - Requires extensive training data and computational resources As the following tables show, by evaluating research, details such as the type of forest or each study area, the primary goals, the variables examined (Table 3 ), and the algorithms, classifiers, or indices (Table 4 ), sensor’ type (Table 5 ) and methods used (Table 6 ) are explored. Table 3 A summary of forest type, objectives, and variables studied Aspect Details Types of Forests Studies have been conducted in various forest types, including temperate, subtropical, and urban (agro-forestry) systems. UAVs and remote sensing techniques are notably used in subtropical forests for assessing biodiversity Main Objectives Classification of Species : Identifying and categorizing different plant species. Prediction of Biodiversity Metrics : Estimating indices like species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index. Mapping and Monitoring Changes : Tracking changes in species composition and habitat quality over time, especially in response to environmental stressors Variables Studied Species Richness : Number of different species in an area. Abundance : Number of each species’ individuals. Vegetation Indices : Metrics like NDVI derived from remote sensing data. Structural Attributes : Physical characteristics such as canopy height and density that influence biodiversity Table 4 A summary of algorithms and indices used in assessing forest plant diversity via remote sensing Aspect Details Classification Algorithms Random Forest (RF) : Utilized for predicting species diversity from remote sensing data. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) : A machine learning approach for biodiversity prediction Deep Neural Networks (DNN) : Employed for analyzing complex datasets obtained from remote sensing. Indices for Biodiversity Assessment Species Richness : The count of different species present in a specific area. Shannon-Wiener Index : Measures species diversity by considering both abundance and evenness. Simpson Index : Evaluates the probability that two randomly selected individuals from a sample belong to the same species Table 5 A summary of key types of sensors and approaches used in forest plant diversity assessment through remote sensing Type Description Satellite Sensors Multispectral Sensors Capture data across multiple wavelengths (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2); useful for vegetation classification. Hyperspectral Sensors Capture hundreds of narrow bands for detailed spectral analysis (e.g., AVIRIS, EnMAP). LiDAR Provides 3D information about forest structure, canopy height, and density. Aerial Sensors Drones (UAVs) Equipped with multispectral and hyperspectral cameras for high-resolution data collection. Fixed-Wing Aircraft Used for larger areas; can carry advanced sensors for detailed mapping. Ground-Based Sensors Soil and Weather Sensors Measure environmental variables like moisture, temperature, and nutrients. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) Provides precise 3D models of forest structure. Table 6 A summary of approaches used in forest plant diversity assessment through remote sensing Type Description Image Processing Techniques Classification Algorithms Supervised and unsupervised methods for classifying vegetation types. Change Detection Identifying changes in forest cover and species composition over time. Machine Learning Predictive Modeling Using algorithms to predict plant diversity based on environmental and spectral data. Deep Learning Neural networks for advanced image classification and feature extraction. Ecological Modeling Species Distribution Models (SDMs) Integrates remote sensing data with ecological and climate data to predict species distributions. Functional Diversity Assessments Evaluates ecosystem functions based on the diversity of plant traits. Integration of Data Sources GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Combines remote sensing data with ground-truthing data for comprehensive analysis. Data Fusion Techniques Merges data from different sensors for enhanced analysis. Field Validation Ground Truthing Collecting field data to validate remote sensing results and improve model accuracy. Remote sensing has emerged as a vital tool for monitoring forest biodiversity, with various methods demonstrating differing accuracy levels. The accuracy of these methods is influenced by factors such as sensor type, spectral and spatial resolution, and the indices used for biodiversity assessment. A table that summarizes the accuracy values for the several techniques employed in forest biodiversity monitoring is shown below (Table 7 ). Table 7 A summary of accuracy values for various methods used in forest biodiversity monitoring Method Accuracy/Performance UAV-borne Hyperspectral and LiDAR High precision in species identification and diversity estimation, with accuracies exceeding 85% for species classification in complex forest environments. Satellite Imagery (Sentinel-1 & Sentinel-2) Variable accuracy; up to 90% for tree species mapping when combined with machine learning algorithms. LiDAR Technology Estimates of above-ground biomass (AGB) with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values ranging from 10–20%, depending on forest structure and density. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) High-resolution data achieving accuracies often above 90% for metrics such as tree height and crown dimensions. Multispectral Imaging Generally yields lower accuracies, around 70–80% for vegetation classification, compared to hyper-spectral methods. Remote sensing-based forest diversity assessment relies on various biodiversity parameters and indicators. These include species richness, Shannon's entropy, Simpson's diversity, and vegetation cover [ 16 , 82 ]. Additionally, functional diversity metrics such as plant functional traits and spectral diversity have been explored [14, 27). The use of remote sensing data allows for the estimation and mapping of these diversity indices at different spatial and temporal scales [ 83 ]. Spectral information content, vegetation indices, and spectral species have been identified as important concepts for assessing forest biodiversity using remote sensing. Geodiversity variables, such as topographic and soil characteristics, have also been found to be valuable in combination with remote sensing features for accurate diversity estimation. Overall, a combination of these parameters and indicators provides a comprehensive approach for remote sensing-based forest diversity assessment, enabling effective monitoring and management of biodiversity. The following is a table (Table 8 ) summarizing the key information extracted from the studies analyzed, highlighting the parameters and indicators used to assess biodiversity, forest structure, and health. Table 8 Parameters and Indicators Used Category Parameters and Indicators Species Diversity Indices Commonly used indices include the Shannon-Wiener Index, Simpson Index, and species richness metrics, which quantify biodiversity within forest ecosystems. Structural Parameters Important metrics for assessing forest structure and health include tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), crown area, and canopy cover. Health Condition Indicators Indicators such as leaf area index (LAI), chlorophyll content, and spectral reflectance indices, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), are utilized to monitor forest health. 4.4 Selected Case Studies for Detailed Discussion This section examines selected case studies that demonstrate how remote sensing evaluates forest plant diversity parameters, providing detailed analysis of study areas, methods, findings, and limitations across different ecosystems. Case studies offer specific examples of how remote sensing is used to monitor forest diversity in a range of environments, such as wetlands, temperate forests, and tropical rainforests. These studies demonstrate how well remote sensing methods work for mapping and identifying various tree species, measuring canopy cover and height in forests, and evaluating diversity indicators like species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index. Table S1 lists a number of exemplary publications of case studies and review papers that use remote sensing to demonstrate how forest diversity metrics are monitored across various ecosystems. In the table, study area, overview, methodology, findings, and limitations of each publication are discussed. For example, remote sensing and terrestrial biosphere modeling were integrated in the study by Schneider et al. [ 15 ] to explore the relationship between functional diversity and productivity in a heterogeneous forest ecosystem in Switzerland. Pangtey et al. used multi-date Sentinel-2 NDVI to estimate tree diversity in a seasonal tropical forest and found that Rao's Q index derived from NDVI showed a higher correlation with tree diversity during the leaf flushing period [ 84 ]. Li et al. [ 22 ] compared spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification and self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering methods using UAV-borne hyperspectral and LiDAR data to estimate forest species diversity indices in subtropical forest areas in China, revealing that the classification method outperformed in predicting species richness and Shannon-Wiener index. Ren et al. used GEDI LiDAR data and Sentinel-2 imagery to estimate forest diversity in temperate natural forests and found that foliage height diversity, spectral bands, and vegetation indices were important variables for predicting diversity [ 85 ]. Xi et al. [ 44 ] employed multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and − 2 imagery along with machine learning models to predict forest tree species diversity in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest area in northeast China, revealing that a deep neural network model and multi-temporal data yielded favorable results. Kacic and Kuenzer reviewed the concepts of remotely sensed spectral diversity for forest biodiversity monitoring, focusing on vegetation indices, spectral information content, and spectral species [ 27 ]. These studies demonstrate the use of remote sensing data from various sources, such as airborne and spaceborne sensors, to assess forest plant diversity parameters in different ecosystems. 4.5 Challenges and Future Directions 4.5.1 Challenges and limitations of remote sensing in Forest plant diversity monitoring There are currently several challenges and limitations facing remote sensing in the assessment of forest plant diversity. One major challenge is the availability of data, as there may be limitations on the habitats and species information in urban areas [ 53 ]. Another challenge is the scale mismatch between remote sensing data and ground observations, as global biodiversity observatory systems need to combine remote sensing with ground observations to develop reliable and interpretable products [ 82 ]. Spectral confusion is another limitation, as the spectral diversity obtained from plant communities may not directly correspond to different facets of biodiversity, such as taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity [ 86 ]. Additionally, the limited or coarse spatial resolution of remote sensing data, changes in remotely sensed reflectance data over time, and weak linkages between species counts and spectral diversity in agricultural landscapes can negatively impact the estimation of plant diversity using spectral diversity [ 87 ]. These challenges and limitations highlight the need for further research and development in remote sensing techniques for biodiversity assessment. Key research areas, such as sensor calibration and image correction, spectral signatures and feature extraction, species-level classification algorithms, scale and resolution challenges, validation and ground truthing, integration of data sources could address the existing limitations and improving the precision and practicality of remote sensing in forest plant diversity assessment. The research area of sensor calibration and image correction aims to develop robust techniques for ensuring consistent radiometric and geometric accuracy across different sensors and platforms, as well as exploring image correction methods, such as atmospheric correction, to minimize errors and improve the quality of remote sensing data [ 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ], ultimately enhancing the accuracy of plant diversity assessment. The research area of Spectral Signature Analysis and feature extraction aims to improve plant species identification and diversity assessment accuracy by extracting meaningful features from remote sensing data, reducing noise, and enhancing discriminatory power in classification algorithms [ 92 , 93 ]. The research area of advanced or species-level classification algorithms, such as k-nearest neighbor aims to accurately identify and classify tree species using machine learning and deep learning approaches (e.g., Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, Convolutional Neural Networks) with remote sensing data for improved diversity assessment [ 94 , 66 , 95 ]. Fusion of multispectral imagery (MSI), panchromatic imagery (PAN), and LiDAR data at the feature and decision levels has shown significant improvements in tree species classification compared to using these data sources individually [ 14 ]. Graph convolution networks (GCNs) have also been used for tree species classification by fusing hyperspectral images (HSIs) and multispectral images (MSIs) through canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and graph node fusion (Wang et al., 2023). Additionally, the use of self-attention mechanism networks (SAN) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in parallel with image super-resolution reconstruction techniques has improved classification accuracy for forest tree species using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing imagery [ 102 ]. Furthermore, the PointNet + + algorithm has been applied to point cloud data from airborne LiDAR for tree species classification, with enhanced down-sampling and multi-scale sampling and grouping (MSG) methods yielding improved results [ 94 ]. Finally, the development of fractal geometry-based and quantitative structural model (QSM)-based feature vectors has shown effective improvements in tree species classification using LiDAR technology [ 95 ]. The research area on addressing scale and resolution challenges in remote sensing improves plant diversity assessment accuracy by investigating upscaling, downscaling, multi-scale information techniques, and sensor data integration, bridging the gap between field-based observations and remote sensing data across spatial scales [ 96 , 97 ]. The validation and ground truthing research area develops standardized protocols for ground truth data collection, including field surveys, plot inventories, and species identification, to accurately validate remote sensing-derived metrics and models for reliable plant diversity assessments [ 98 ]. The data sources integration research area explores effective methods to integrate diverse data sources, such as hyperspectral imagery, LiDAR data, and ancillary information, to enhance accuracy and applicability in remote sensing-based plant diversity assessment, improving precision and practicality (65, 82, 83, 15, 99]. These methods aim to combine different types of data to provide a comprehensive understanding of plant diversity at various spatial and temporal scales. By integrating data from multiple sources, researchers can obtain more reliable and detailed information about plant species composition, distribution, and ecosystem functioning [ 100 ]. This integration allows for a more holistic approach to biodiversity monitoring and conservation planning, enabling the identification of biodiversity hotspots, the detection of invasive species, and the assessment of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. Taken as a whole, the integration of diverse data sources in remote sensing-based plant diversity assessment provides valuable insights for effective management and conservation of biodiversity. In general, addressing sensor calibration, spectral signature analysis, classification algorithms, scale and resolution challenges, validation, and data integration improves remote sensing accuracy and applicability in assessing forest plant diversity, leading to better understanding of ecosystems and informed conservation decisions. 4.5.2 Advancements in Remote Sensing for Monitoring Forest Plant Diversity: Future Prospects and Potential Developments Future developments and advancements in remote sensing technologies and methodologies for monitoring forest plant diversity include the use of satellite systems specifically designed for global biodiversity assessment and monitoring [ 53 ]. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology is also being increasingly used for monitoring forest species diversity [ 22 ]. Concepts of remotely sensed spectral diversity, such as vegetation indices, spectral information content, and spectral species, show promise for the consistent and multi-temporal analysis of forest biodiversity [ 27 ]. Challenges that need to be addressed include user uptake, technical challenges related to forest inventories, and map validation [ 51 ]. Multi-source data fusion, such as satellite and UAV/drone data fusion, can provide more accurate and comprehensive forest classification and monitoring [ 101 ]. Future research trends in remote sensing for forest management include the integration of diverse teams, global cooperation, and collaborations across disciplines. These developments and advancements in remote sensing technologies and methodologies will contribute to improved remote sensing capabilities and applications in various fields. 5 Conclusion and Outlooks This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment based on remote sensing, highlighting the importance of biodiversity in ecological systems. It emphasizes the role of plant diversity in maintaining the stability and functioning of forest ecosystems and underscores the need for biodiversity monitoring in conservation efforts and decision-making. Remote sensing data has emerged as a valuable tool for biodiversity research and conservation. It offers information-rich data and a flexible and cost-effective method for monitoring forest species diversity, identifying hotspots, and facilitating planning and monitoring in forest resource management. Advanced technologies like remote sensing, bioacoustics, and environmental DNA are promising approaches that can fill taxonomic and geographic data gaps. The paper discusses various remote sensing techniques employed in assessing forest plant diversity, including satellite imagery, LiDAR, hyperspectral imaging, radar imagery, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The benefits and drawbacks of these techniques are evaluated, along with the challenges in biodiversity monitoring, such as taxonomy gaps and spatial coverage limitations. The literature review reveals an increasing trend in publications on remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment, with a peak of 36 articles in 2023. Research articles constituted the majority (69), followed by reviews (18) and books (4). The review indicates the leading journals in the field, including Forests, Biodiversity and Conservation, Diversity, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and Conservation Biology, as well as the publishing companies MDPI, Wiley, Springer Nature, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis Group, Frontiers, and SPIE. The publications were distributed across six continents, with Europe having the highest number, followed by Asia, North America, and Africa. Most studies focused on temperate forests, followed by tropical and boreal forests. Active remote sensing sensors were used in the majority of studies, with LiDAR being the most widely used technology. The challenges and limitations of remote sensing in forest plant diversity assessment, such as data availability, scale mismatch, spectral confusion, and limited spatial resolution, are discussed. Key research areas for improvement include sensor calibration, spectral signatures, species-level classification algorithms, and integration of data sources. Future trends in remote sensing for forest management involve collaboration, global cooperation, interdisciplinary approaches, and data fusion or integration to enhance capabilities and applications. In conclusion, this review paper provides valuable insights into remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment, highlighting the significance of biodiversity monitoring and the potential of advanced technologies. It identifies the current state of research, challenges, and future directions, contributing to the advancement of remote sensing applications in forest management and conservation. Based on the findings of this review, it is recommended that stakeholders and researchers enhance their capacity for biodiversity monitoring, particularly in high-biodiversity countries with data gaps. This can be achieved by following best monitoring practices, adopting appropriate indicators, and making data openly available to enhance results-based management, conserve biodiversity, and sustain ecosystem services. Furthermore, there is a need for integrated, continuous, and accurate quantitative biodiversity assessments to mitigate the current rates of biodiversity loss. This requires collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to develop standardized protocols and methodologies for remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring. In addition, further research is needed to explore the potential of advanced technologies such as remote sensing, bioacoustics, and environmental DNA in assessing forest plant diversity. This can help fill the existing data gaps and improve the accuracy of remote sensing approaches. Overall, the findings of this review highlight the importance of remote sensing in assessing forest plant diversity and provide valuable insights for future research and conservation efforts. By leveraging the power of remote sensing, we can better understand and protect the precious biodiversity of our forests. References Aswajith IS, Premlatha S (2022) A Study on Ecological Relevance with Specific Reference to Biodiversity and Conservation. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 10. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.47132 . Issue X Gliessman S (2022) Why is ecological diversity important? Editorial. Taylor & Francis: Agroecology and sustainable food systems, 46 (3), 329–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2032513 Oguh CE, Obiwulu ENO, Umezinwa OJ, Ameh SE, Ugwu CV, andSheshi IM (2021) Ecosystem and Ecological Services; Need for Biodiversity Conservation-A Critical Review. Asian J Biology 11(4). https://doi.org/10.9734/AJOB/2021/V11I430146 Khush SG (2023) Biodiversity is nature's gift for the survival of the human race: Some reflections. Crop Environ 2(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.003 Yang Q, Wang L, Huang J, Lu L, Li Y, Du Y, Ling F (2022) Mapping plant diversity based on combined SENTINEL-1/2 Data—Opportunities for subtropical mountainous forests. Remote Sens 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030492 Singh V (2024) Threats to Biodiversity. Textbook of Environment and Ecology. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 217–224 Chapman M, Goldstein B, Schell C, Brashares J, Xu L, Ellis-Soto D, Norman K, Longdon J, Scoville C, Faxon H, Carter N, Goldstein J, O'Rourke D, Boettiger C (2023) The social and political dimensions of biodiversity monitoring. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10547,2023 Moersberger H, Valdez J, Martin GCJ, Junker J, Georgieva I, Bauer S, Beja P, Breeze DT, Fernandez M, Fernández N, Brotons L, Jandt U, Bruelheide H, Kissling WD, Langer C, Liquete C, Lumbierres M, Solheim AL, Maes J, Ordonez MA, Moreira F, Pe’er G, Santana J, Shamoun-Baranes J, Smets B, Capinha C, McCallum I, Pereira MH, Bonn A (2023) Biodiversity monitoring in Europe: user and policy needs. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.12.548673 Dalton DT, Berger V, Adams V, Botha J, Halloy S, Kirchmeir H, Jungmeier M (2023) A Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Monitoring Programs in Conservation Areas. Sustainability 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086779 Stephenson PJ, Londoño-Murcia MC, Borges PAV et al (2022) Louw Claassens, Heidrun Frisch-Nwakanma, Nicholas Ling, Sapphire McMullan-Fisher, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Kerrigan Marie Machado Unter, Judith L. Walls,. Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga MDPI: Diversity 14, no. 10: 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100824 Laamanen T, Norros V, Vihervaara P, Jerney J, Kortelainen P, Kujala K, Meissner K (2024) Technology Readiness Level of biodiversity monitoring with molecular methods–where are we on the road to routine implementation? Preprint, 5. https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e132214 Hansen AJ, Noble BP, Veneros J, East A, Goetz SJ, Supples C, Watson JEM, Jantz PA, Pillay R, Jetz W, Ferrier S, Grantham HS, Evans TD, Ervin J, Venter O, Virnig ALS (2021) Toward monitoring forest ecosystem integrity within the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conserv Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12822 Reddy CS (2021) Remote sensing of biodiversity: what to measure and monitor from space to species? Biodivers Conserv 30(10):2617–2631. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-021-02216-5 Li Q, Hu B, Shang J, Li H (2023) Fusion Approaches to Individual Tree Species Classification Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data. Forests 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071392 Schneider FD, Longo M, Paul-Limoges E, Scholl VM, Schmid B, Morsdorf F, Pavlick RP, Schimel DS, Schaepman ME, Moorcroft PR (2023) Remote sensing‐based forest modeling reveals positive effects of functional diversity on productivity at local spatial scale. J Geophys Research: Biogeosciences 128(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007421 Parisi F, Vangi E, Francini S, D’Amico G, Chirici G, Marchetti M, Lombardi F, Travaglini D, Ravera S, Santis ED, Tognetti R (2023) Sentinel-2 time series analysis for monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity in mountain beech forests. Front Forests Global Change. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1020477 Massey R, Berner LT, Foster AC, Goetz SJ, Vepakomma U (2023) Remote Sensing Tools for Monitoring Forests and Tracking Their Dynamics. Boreal Forests in the Face of Climate Change: Sustainable Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15988-6_26 . Kerry GR, Montalbo JF, Das R, Patra S, Mahapatra PG, Maurya KG, Atala NV, Jena B, Ukhurebor EK, Ukhurebor E, Jena CR, Gouda S, Majhi S, Rout RJ (2022) An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23242-y Nico G, Monaco M, Masci O (2023) Analysis of vegetation biodiversity by means of abundance-based metrics and agent-based models applied to spaceborne multispectral, hyperspectral and SAR images (No. EGU23-4477). https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4477 . Copernicus Meetings Ren C, Jiang H, Xi Y, Liu P, Li H (2023) Quantifying temperate forest diversity by integrating GEDI LiDAR and multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020375 Alessi N, Bonari G, Zannini P, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Chiarucci A (2023) Probabilistic and preferential sampling approaches offer integrated perspectives of Italian forest diversity. J Veg Sci 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13175 Li X, Zheng Z, Xu C, Zhao P, Chen J, Wu J, Zhao X, Mu X, Zhao D, Zeng Y (2023) Individual tree-based forest species diversity estimation by classification and clustering methods using UAV data. Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1139458 Tekle T, Maryo M (2022) Ecological Assessment of Woody Plant Diversity and the Associated Threats in Afromontane Forest of Ambericho, Southern Ethiopia. J Landsc Ecol 15(2):102–126. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2022-0013 Dounias E (2018) Rainforest, Tropical. National Research Institute for Sustainable Development and Center for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1682 Kayes I, Mallik A (2020) Boreal Forests: Distributions, Biodiversity, and Management. Environmental Science, Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_17-1 Dreiss LM, Volin JC Forests: Temperate Evergreen and Deciduous., Taylor, Francis (2014) https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ENRL-120047447 Kacic P, Kuenzer C (2022) Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Based on Remotely Sensed Spectral Diversity - A Review. Remote Sensing, Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215363 Spicer ME, Radhamoni HVN, Duguid MC, Queenborough SA, Comita LS (2022) Herbaceous plant diversity in forest ecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and threats. Plant Ecol 223(2):117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11258-021-01202-9 Ustymenko PM, Dubyna DV, Baranovskyi BO, Zhykharieva AV (2022) Rare diversity of forest vegetation of the steppe zone: current state, threats and directions of changes. Ecol Noospherology 33(2):55–60. https://doi.org/10.15421/032209 Kefalew A, Soromessa T, Demissew S (2022) Plant diversity and community analysis of Sele-Nono forest, Southwest Ethiopia: implication for conservation planning. Bot Stud 63(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-022-00353-w Šipek M, Kutnar L, Marinšek A, Šajna N (2022) Contrasting Responses of Alien and Ancient Forest Indicator Plant Species to Fragmentation Process in the Temperate Lowland Forests. Plants 11(23):3392. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233392 Storch F, Boch S, Gossner MM, Feldhaar H, Ammer C, Schall P, Polle A, Kroiher F, Müller J, Bauhus J (2023) Linking structure and species richness to support forest biodiversity monitoring at large scales. Ann For Sci 80(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01169-1 Aravanopoulos FA, Tourvas N, Malliarou E, Lyrou FG, Kotina VM, Farsakoglou AM (2022) Forest Genetic Monitoring in a Biodiversity Hotspot. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13127 Makhubele L, Araia MG, Chirwa PW (2023) Harvesting distance effect on tree species diversity in traditional agroforestry landscape: a case of Vhembe Biosphere Reserve in South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 32(10):3397–3421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02671-2 Ulman Y, Singh M, Kumar A, Sharma M (2021) Conservation of plant diversity in agroforestry systems in a biodiversity hotspot region of northeast India. Agricultural Res 10(4):569–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40003-020-00525-9 Rattanapotanan N (2019) Plant Diversity and Utilization of Medicinal Plants by Traditional Healers. Naresuan Univ Journal: Sci Technol (NUJST) 27(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.14456/nujst.2019.6 Carroll C, Noss RF, Dreiss LM, Hamilton H, Stein BA (2023) Four challenges to an effective national nature assessment. Conserv Biol 37(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14075 . Version-1) Mammides C, Martini F, Kounnamas C (2022) Remote assessments of human pressure on biodiversity may miss important human threats. Integr Conserv 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.11 Pascher K, Švara V, Jungmeier M (2022) Environmental DNA-Based Methods in Biodiversity Monitoring of Protected Areas: Application Range, Limitations, and Needs. http://doi.org/10.3390/d14060463 Ariza M, Fouks B, Mauvisseau Q, Halvorsen R, Alsos IG, de Boer HJ (2023) Plant biodiversity assessment through soil eDNA reflects temporal and local diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13865 Capurso G, Carroll B, Stewart KA (2023) Transforming marine monitoring: Using eDNA metabarcoding to improve the monitoring of the Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas network. Mar Policy 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105807 Krigas N, Papadimitriou K, Mazaris AD (2012) GIS and ex situ plant conservation. Application of Geographic Information Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50525 Salehi F, Ahmadian L (2017) The application of geographic information systems (GIS) in identifying the priority areas for maternal care and services. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2423-9 Xi Y, Zhang W, Brandt M, Tian Q, Fensholt R (2023) Mapping tree species diversity of temperate forests using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and-2 imagery. Sci Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2023.100094 Fedoniuk TP, Skydan OV (2023) Incorporating geographic information technologies into a framework for biological diversity conservation and preventing biological threats to landscapes. Space Sci Technol 29(2). https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.02.010 Mudi S, Roy S, Das P, Pasha SV (2021) Development of a WebGIS platform to generate biodiversity data using citizen science approach. In Forest Resources Resilience and Conflicts (pp. 17–31). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822931-6.00002-2 Bariotakis M, Georgescu L, Laina D, Oikonomou I, Ntagounakis G, Koufaki MI, Souma M, Choreftakis M, Zormpa M, Smykal OG, Sourvinos P, Lionis G, Castanas C, Karousou E, R., &, Pirintsos SA (2019) From wild harvest towards precision agriculture: Use of Ecological Niche Modelling to direct potential cultivation of wild medicinal plants in Crete. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133681 Bearman N, Jones N, André I, Cachinho HA, DeMers M (2016) The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. J Geogr High Educ 40(3):394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729 Zheng Z, Li X, Xu C, Zhao P, Chen J, Wu J, Zeng Y (2023) Int Archives Photogrammetry Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 48:1929–1934. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1929-2023 . Individual Tree-Based Forest Species Diversity Estimation Using Uav-Borne Hyperspectral and LIDAR Data Ma Y, Zhao Y, Im J, Zhao Y, Zhen Z (2024) A deep-learning-based tree species classification for natural secondary forests using unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral images and LiDAR. Ecol Ind 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111608 Fassnacht FE, White JC, Wulder MA, Næsset E (2024) Remote sensing in forestry: Current challenges, considerations and directions. Forestry: Int J For Res 97(1):11–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad024 Lines ER, Allen M, Cabo C, Calders K, Debus A, Grieve SW, Puliti S (2022), December AI applications in forest monitoring need remote sensing benchmark datasets. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4528–4533). IEEE Schweiger AK (2023) Remote Sensing of Biodiversity–Current Challenges and Future Prospects, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15068 Jackson T, Fischer D, Vincent FJ, Eric G, Keller B, Chave MG, Jucker J, Coomes T, D.A (2024) Tall Bornean forests experience higher canopy disturbance rates than those in the eastern Amazon or Guiana shield. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17493 Rocchini D, Torresani M, Beierkuhnlein C, Feoli E, Foody GM, Lenoir J, Ricotta C (2022) Double down on remote sensing for biodiversity estimation: a biological mindset. Community Ecol 23(3):267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-022-00113-7 Illarionova S, Trekin A, Ignatiev V, Oseledets I (2021) Tree species mapping on sentinel-2 satellite imagery with weakly supervised classification and object-wise sampling. Forests 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101413 Muise ER, Coops NC, Hermosilla T, Ban SS (2022) Assessing representation of remote sensing derived forest structure and land cover across a network of protected areas. Ecol Appl 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2603 Acebes P, Lillo P, Jaime-González C (2021) Disentangling LiDAR contribution in modelling species–habitat structure relationships in terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. A systematic review and future directions. Remote Sens 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173447 Divya M, Chandran V, Pai D, Thankachan AD, Anagha AP, J (2022) Vegetation Scanning Using LiDAR-Based Drone. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng Inform Technol 275–286. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT228145 Moeslund JE, Zlinszky A, Ejrnæs R, Brunbjerg AK, Bøcher PK, Svenning JC, Normand S (2019) LIDAR explains diversity of plants, fungi, lichens and bryophytes across multiple habitats and large geographic extent. https://doi.org/10.1101/509794 . BioRxiv Lenoir J, Gril E, Durrieu S, Horen H, Laslier M, Lembrechts JJ, Decocq G (2022) Unveil the unseen: Using LiDAR to capture time-lag dynamics in the herbaceous layer of European temperate forests. J Ecol 110(2):282–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13837 Moeslund JE, Clausen KK, Dalby L, Fløjgaard C, Pärtel M, Pfeifer N, Brunbjerg AK (2023) Using airborne lidar to characterize North European terrestrial high-dark‐diversity habitats. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 9(3):354–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.314 Parada-Díaz J, Fernández López ÁB, Gómez González LA, del Arco Aguilar MJ, González-Mancebo JM (2022) Assessing the Usefulness of LiDAR for Monitoring the Structure of a Montane Forest on a Subtropical Oceanic Island. Remote Sens 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040994 Tian Y, Huang H, Zhou G, Zhang Q, Xie X, Ou J, Lin J (2023) Mangrove Biodiversity Assessment Using UAV Lidar and Hyperspectral Data in China’s Pinglu Canal Estuary. Remote Sens 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102622 Liccari F, Sigura M, Bacaro G (2022) Use of remote sensing techniques to estimate plant diversity within ecological networks: a worked example. Remote Sens 14(19):4933. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194933 Guillaume R, Olivier F (2022) Remote sensing tools for plant invasions assessment in native tropical forests of a volcanic island. bioRxiv 2022–2005. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.15.491984 Williams LJ, Cavender-Bares J, Townsend PA, Couture JJ, Wang Z, Stefanski A, Reich PB (2021) Remote spectral detection of biodiversity effects on forest biomass. Nat Ecol Evol 5(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01329-4 Dmitriev PA, Kozlovsky BL, Kupriushkin DP, Dmitrieva AA, Rajput VD, Chokheli VA, Varduni TV (2022) Assessment of invasive and weed species by hyperspectral imagery in agrocenoses ecosystem. Remote Sens 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102442 Kamoske AG, Dahlin KM, Read QD, Record S, Stark SC, Serbin SP, Zarnetske PL (2022) Towards mapping biodiversity from above: Can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 31(7):1440–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13516 Xie R (2020) Airborne hyperspectral data for estimation and mapping of forest leaf area index (Master's thesis, University of Twente). https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/84939 Shiwen L, Steel L, Dahlsjö CA, Peirson SN, Shenkin A, Morimoto T, Spitschan M (2021), September Hyperspectral characterisation of natural illumination in woodland and forest environments. In Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIV (Vol. 11815, pp. 32–41). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452949 Dominiak-Świgoń M, Olejniczak P, Nowak M, Lembicz M (2019) Hyperspectral imaging in assessing the condition of plants: strengths and weaknesses. Biodivers Res Conserv 55(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2019-0011 Lausch A, Heurich M, Magdon P, Rocchini D, Schulz K, Bumberger J, King DJ (2020) A range of earth observation techniques for assessing plant diversity. Remote Sens plant Biodivers 309–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_13 Bae S, Levick SR, Heidrich L, Magdon P, Leutner BF, Wöllauer S, Müller J (2019) Radar vision in the mapping of forest biodiversity from space. Nat Commun 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12737-x Hambrecht L, Lucieer A, Malenovský Z, Melville B, Ruiz-Beltran AP, Phinn S (2022) Considerations for Assessing Functional Forest Diversity in High-Dimensional Trait Space Derived from Drone-Based Lidar. Remote Sens 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174287 Millner N, Cunliffe AM, Mulero-Pázmány M, Newport B, Sandbrook C, Wich S (2023) Exploring the opportunities and risks of aerial monitoring for biodiversity conservation. Global Social Challenges J 1(aop):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/TIOK6806 Shi S, Chen B, Bi S, Li J, Gong W, Sun J, Chen B, Du L, Yang J, Xu Q, Wang F, Song S (2023) A spatial–spectral classification framework for multispectral LiDAR. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2208611 Sun H, Yan H, Hassanalian M, Zhang J, Abdelkefi A (2023) Towards More Intell Appl Aerosp 10(3):317. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030317 . UAV Platforms for Data Acquisition and Intervention Practices in Forestry: Shithil SM, Faudzi AAM, Abdullah A, Islam N, Saad SM (2022), August Robust Sensor Fusion for Autonomous UAV Navigation in GPS denied Forest Environment. In 2022 IEEE 5th International Symposium in Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMA55875.2022.9915682 Ngo D, Nguyen H, Dang C, Kolesnikov S (2020) UAV application for assessing rainforest structure in Ngoc Linh nature reserve, Vietnam. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 203, p. 03006). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020303006 Luber A, Ramachandran V, Jaafar WSWM, Bajaj S, de-Miguel S, Cardil A, Doaemo W, Mohan M (2023) UAVs for monitoring responses of regenerating forests under increasing climate change-driven droughts - a review. Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012030 Pacheco-Labrador J, de Bello F, Migliavacca M, Ma X, Carvalhais N, Wirth C (2023) A generalizable normalization for assessing plant functional diversity metrics across scales from remote sensing. Methods Ecol Evol 14(8):2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14163 Rahmanian S, Nasiri V, Amindin A, Karami S, Maleki S, Pouyan S, Borz SA (2023) Remote Sens 15(2):387. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020387 . Prediction of Plant Diversity Using Multi-Seasonal Remotely Sensed and Geodiversity Data in a Mountainous Area Pangtey D, Padalia H, Bodh R, Rai ID, Nandy S (2023) Application of remote sensing-based spectral variability hypothesis to improve tree diversity estimation of seasonal tropical forest considering phenological variations. Geocarto Int 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2178525 Ren C, Jiang H, Xi Y, Liu P, Li H (2023) Quantifying temperate forest diversity by integrating GEDI LiDAR and multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens 15(2):375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020375 Ziliaskopoulos K, Laspidou C (2023) Using remote-sensing and citizen-science data to assess urban biodiversity for sustainable cityscapes. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2973172/v1 Rossi C, Hauser L, Gholizadeh H (2023) How to overcome different limitations in estimating plant diversity via spectral diversity? (No. EGU23-2872). https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2872 . Copernicus Meetings Talas Mahammad Diganta M, Uddin G, M., Olbert AI (2023), May Assessing the atmospheric correction algorithms for improving the retrieval data accuracy in the remote sensing technique. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13477 Ichikawa D, Nagai M, Tamkuan N, Katiyar V, Eguchi T, Nagai Y (2022) Development and Utilization of a Mirror Array Target for the Calibration and Harmonization of Micro-Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225717 Végh L, Tsuyuzaki S (2021) Remote sensing of forest diversities: the effect of image resolution and spectral plot extent. Int J Remote Sens 42(15). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.1934596 Tuominen S, Näsi R, Honkavaara E, Balazs A, Hakala T, Viljanen N, Pölönen I, Saari H, Ojanen H (2018) Assessment of classifiers and remote sensing features of hyperspectral imagery and stereo-photogrammetric point clouds for recognition of tree species in a forest area of high species diversity. Remote Sens 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050714 Immitzer M, Atzberger C (2023) Tree Species Diversity Mapping—Success Stories and Possible Ways Forward. Remote Sens 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123074 Rina S, Ying H, Shan Y, Du W, Liu Y, Li R, Deng D (2023) Application of machine learning to tree species classification using active and passive remote sensing: a case study of the Duraer forestry zone. Remote Sens 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102596 Fan CL (2023) Ground surface structure classification using UAV remote sensing images and machine learning algorithms. Appl Geomatics 15(4):919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00530-x Hui Z, Cai Z, Xu P, Xia Y, Cheng P (2023) Tree Species Classification Using Optimized Features Derived from Light Detection and Ranging Point Clouds Based on Fractal Geometry and Quantitative Structure Model. Forests 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061265 Chrysafis I, Mallinis G, Korakis G, Dragozi E (2019), June Forest diversity estimation using Sentinel-2 and RapidEye imagery: A case study of the Northern Pindos National Park. In Seventh International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2019) (Vol. 11174, pp. 50–58). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2533661 Wang R, Gamon JA (2019) Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity. Elsevier: Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111218 Gound RS, Thepade SD (2022) Validation of ground truth of remotely sensed data from sentinel-2 (msi) using supervised classification, after combined cloud and shadow effect removal. Indian J Comput Sci Eng 13(3):860–868. https://doi.org/10.21817/indjcse/2022/v13i3/221303164 Vuorinne I, Heiskanen J, Ocholla I, Kihungu R, Pellikka P (2023) Assessment of airborne remote sensing data for high-resolution mapping of invasive Prosopis spp. in a semi-arid environment in Kenya (No. EGU23-12336). Copernicus Meetings. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12336 Katrandzhiev K, Gocheva K, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2022) Whole System Data Integration for Condition Assessments of Climate Change Impacts: An Example in High-Mountain Ecosystems in Rila (Bulgaria). Diversity 14(4):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14040240 Mohammadpour P, Viegas C (2022) Adv Remote Sens For Monit 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119788157.ch12 . Applications of Multi-Source and Multi‐Sensor Data Fusion of Remote Sensing for Forest Species Mapping Huang Y, Zhang L, Qi W, Huang C, Song R (2023) Contrastive self-supervised two-domain residual attention network with random augmentation pool for hyperspectral change detection. Remote Sens 15(15):3739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153739 Tamburlin D, Torresani M, Tomelleri E, Tonon G, Rocchini D (2021) Testing the height variation hypothesis with the R Rasterdiv package for tree species diversity estimation. Remote Sens 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183569 Pacheco ADP, da Silva Junior JA, Ruiz-Armenteros AM, Henriques RFF, de Oliveira Santos I (2023) Analysis of spectral separability for detecting burned areas using landsat-8 OLI/TIRS images under different biomes in brazil and Portugal. Forests 14(4):663 Table S1 Table S1 is not available with this version. Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6105040","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":420707528,"identity":"8acb83f3-22b9-415c-8874-367f171ae86c","order_by":0,"name":"Zelalem Teshager","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Addis Ababa University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zelalem","middleName":"","lastName":"Teshager","suffix":""},{"id":420707529,"identity":"19dc3b50-054e-47ad-82fd-45ea8b3ebf64","order_by":1,"name":"Teshome Soromessa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Addis Ababa University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Teshome","middleName":"","lastName":"Soromessa","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-02-25 12:10:44","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":78247043,"identity":"526e6da5-b836-434e-980f-49b25487a1e7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:45","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":475603,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ekeywords co-occurrence map by using “VOSviewer” tool\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/104943b82d8913215268f146.png"},{"id":78247045,"identity":"d9aab260-0fd2-4888-95d9-3d8f73449e94","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:48","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":100212,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eWork flowchart illustrating the systematic literature review process (selecting, evaluating, and reviewing articles)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/907c9fb8af4f6a22a41d8277.png"},{"id":78249044,"identity":"e08a5bac-fba6-4a9d-8d71-c34081ca7ab0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:44:44","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":18213,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDistribution of remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment publications across time (from 2012 to 2024). Note that! 2024 only covers January–February.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/584f130d917f775b07fb55e8.png"},{"id":78247018,"identity":"93908a6d-1ea5-4ae9-b383-f97b9fd4ef8e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:39","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":22745,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe number of publications that have been published regarding forest plant diversity using remote sensing for each type of paper\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/26426d02fb56045e0095b628.png"},{"id":78247047,"identity":"108a7997-bdea-437a-a986-4598d3d9f77e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:52","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":24860,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe relationship between Journal and Number of Published Articles\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/d8850e185588acb0c340d3e3.png"},{"id":78247072,"identity":"1f6716fc-e858-4482-8ab9-fc97efc5b1b2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:54","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":22024,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe relationship between academic Publishing Company and number of publications\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/637ea250b3f370dbed2678d9.png"},{"id":78247020,"identity":"a52005c2-9a2f-439b-8568-111a53f726f4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:39","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":189039,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePublished articles by country\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/000e7e7570d4f71b32a5aeb5.png"},{"id":78249036,"identity":"1133fbcd-b167-45b2-9491-34b701b74a47","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:44:39","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":60322,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe distribution of publications across forest types\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/ffc8453d15ed6ca8444bb521.png"},{"id":78247022,"identity":"821b21f7-bf94-4dc2-95d2-a72f5df3616e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:39","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":24516,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePublications per methods/approaches used to conduct a study\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/c75f644af6b5dd78375f9d57.png"},{"id":78247041,"identity":"22ba6fd9-eee1-4f7b-ba67-37e0a62756f3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 09:36:44","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":698278,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUse of GIS and remote sensing technologies for Forest Monitoring and Management\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/c11333ac15232651e478fe13.png"},{"id":78251464,"identity":"750b0241-857f-427a-ab92-576f99b3d0b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-11 10:00:45","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2861516,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6105040/v1/8538e52a-1c66-4246-9a72-e2e7ca87b3ff.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eForest Plant Diversity Assessment Based on Remote Sensing: A Systematic Literature Review\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1 Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eBiodiversity refers to the variety of living organisms, including plants, animals, and microorganisms, as well as the genes they contain and the ecosystems they form [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. It encompasses different dimensions such as species diversity, genetic diversity, spatial diversity, and functional diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in ecological systems by contributing to ecosystem stability, resilience, and functioning over time [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. It provides essential services such as food production, water purification, climate regulation, and nutrient cycling. Biodiversity also supports sustainable development and human well-being, as it underpins various aspects of our lives, including agriculture, medicine, and cultural values [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Plant diversity is a crucial factor in preserving the stability, services, and functions of forest ecosystems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. However, human activities, such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, pose significant threats to biodiversity, leading to species extinction, disruption of ecological processes, endangers essential ecosystem services, and risks unacceptable environmental consequences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Protecting and conserving biodiversity is crucial for maintaining the health and functioning of ecosystems and ensuring the long-term survival of both human and non-human species.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiodiversity monitoring is crucial for conservation efforts and decision-making. Yang et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e] noticed that for the purpose of managing and conserving forest resources, it is essential to precisely and promptly monitor large-scale wall-to-wall maps of plant variety and its spatial heterogeneity. Chapman et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e] and Moersberger et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e] also agreed that biodiversity monitoring provides evidence-based data to assess the state of biodiversity, evaluate conservation programs, and inform policy-making. Monitoring efforts, however, face challenges such as gaps in taxonomy, spatial coverage, and temporal resolution, resulting in fragmented and disconnected data [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. To address these challenges, it is important to enhance capacity for biodiversity monitoring, especially in high-biodiversity countries with data gaps [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e].The usual biodiversity monitoring method is typically an expensive, time-consuming,and labor-intensive endeavor with time and space limitations [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, according to Stephenson et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e], stakeholders need to improve biodiversity monitoring by following best monitoring practices, adopting appropriate indicators, and making data openly available to enhance results-based management, conserve biodiversity, and sustain ecosystem services. Hansen et al. also stated that integrated, continuous, and accurate quantitative biodiversity assessments are necessary to mitigate the current rates of biodiversity loss [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote sensing data has significantly contributed to biodiversity research and conservation by providing unique and information-rich data, offering a flexible and cost-effective method for monitoring forest species diversity, exploring diversity-productivity relationships, identifying biodiversity hotspots, and facilitating planning and monitoring in forest resource management at various scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. As showed by Kerry et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e], more advanced monitoring techniques, like geographic information systems and remote sensing, make biodiversity conservation and restoration monitoring easier. According to Nico et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e], advanced methods of assessing forest plant diversity include the use of Earth Observation satellite images to map vegetation biodiversity and compute vegetation indices and SAR products. Another method involves combining vertical structure information and multi-temporal phenological characteristics using LiDAR data and optical images to estimate forest diversity indices [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. Probabilistic and preferential sampling approaches can be used to document community diversity, with the probabilistic approach performing better in estimating species richness and diversity of species assemblages, while the preferential approach outperforms in detecting forest-specialist species and plant diversity hotspots [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology can also be used, with the spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification approach providing more accurate monitoring of forest diversity indices, while the self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithm can acquire forest diversity patterns rapidly [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Systematic sampling can be employed to collect vegetation data and assess woody plant species diversity, along with recording environmental variables and conducting ranking exercises [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis review paper aims to present an extensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment based on remote sensing. The various approaches to assessing forest plant diversity are highlighted, especially the use of remote sensing techniques. Their benefits and drawbacks are also discussed, along with the number of publications by year, publishers, and authors, the spatial analysis of the study regions, as well as the sensors that were used. Finally, prospective research directions for remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring are reviewed, as well as challenges and research areas that improve the accuracy of remote sensing approaches.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2 Review structure","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe review is structured into several key sections to provide a comprehensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment using remote sensing techniques. The introduction discusses the definition and significance of biodiversity in ecological systems, emphasizing the importance of evaluating forest biodiversity and the methodologies for measuring plant diversity, particularly through remote sensing. The research method section outlines the literature databases and keywords used to identify relevant articles, detailing the literature selection process. The results and discussion section is organized into several subsections: first, it provides a general overview of forest plant diversity and potential threats; then, it analyzes traditional methods, geographical information systems (GIS), and remote sensing techniques, highlighting their benefits and drawbacks for assessing and conserving forest plant diversity. This section also reviews biodiversity parameters and indicators used in remote sensing-based assessments, along with case studies demonstrating monitoring efforts across various ecosystems. Subsequently, the analysis includes the temporal trends in publications, identifying patterns among publishers and authors, as well as conducting a spatial analysis of study regions. The review culminates in a summary of remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring, outlining challenges and prospective research directions to improve accuracy and effectiveness in biodiversity assessments.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3 Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo conduct a systematic review aimed at evaluating forest plant diversity using remote sensing, the following procedures were followed. Firstly, research questions aligned with the general objective were defined, including inquiries about potential biodiversity threats, the current state of research on remote sensing-based forest diversity evaluation, advanced assessment techniques, biodiversity parameters and indicators for remote sensing-based monitoring, and the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of remote sensing techniques for forest plant diversity monitoring. Secondly, a literature search strategy was carried out using databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Scopus between February 22, 2024, and March 8, 2024. This involved specific keywords related to biodiversity and remote sensing, such as \"remote sensing\" AND (\"forest diversity\" OR \"plant diversity\" OR \"biodiversity\") (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Thirdly, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select relevant publications based on the review's objectives, publication date, language, study design, and geographic relevance. Fourthly, a screening and selection process was conducted, resulting in 92 pertinent publications published between 2012 and 2024 being chosen for analysis. Fifthly, the extracted data was synthesized and analyzed to identify patterns and trends in remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment studies across different ecosystems and to address the research questions. Sixthly, the findings of the reviewed studies were interpreted and discussed in relation to the general objective of the review. Seventhly, the key findings and conclusions of the systematic review were summarized, and the implications for forest assessment, management, conservation, and future research directions were discussed. Finally, a well-structured systematic review report was prepared following the guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting standard. The process of selecting, evaluating, and reviewing articles is illustrated in the flowchart below (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4 Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Comprehensive overview of reviewed publications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.1 Temporal Trend Analysis of Remote Sensing-Based Forest Diversity Assessment Literature\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe discipline's advancement and growth can be understood by examining the published literature's trend on remote sensing-based forest plant diversity evaluation throughout time. Research directions, new topics, and trends can be identified by keeping track of the number of publications produced annually. It aids scholars in comprehending shifts in involvement and enthusiasm for this area. Keeping an eye on publication changes also helps to spot important developments or turning moments. It draws attention to growing research efforts, improvements in methodology or technology, and research deficiencies. Through this study, researchers can assess the significance of their work, pinpoint areas that require more research, and promote cooperation. This trend study offers decision-makers and practitioners in remote sensing-based evaluations a thorough grasp of the state of the field, its obstacles, and its future orientations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith regard to this review paper, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e illustrates an increase in the total number of publications per year between 2012 and 2024, reaching a peak of 36 articles in 2023. More than 83% of all articles have been published since 2021, even though 2024 did not finish until the last access to the literature databases. This highlights the growing number of recent publications. Papers searched from 2013 to 2015 were not chosen for analysis as they did not meet the review's requirements or objectives, making their inclusion irrelevant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.2 Analysis of publications by paper type\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssessing the distribution of published papers among various types of papers allows for the analysis of scholarly contributions. Research articles advance knowledge by presenting novel conclusions and approaches. Review articles summarize the body of knowledge, noting gaps and potential future research areas. Books address a wide range of topics in great detail. Editorials provide knowledgeable viewpoints on pertinent subjects, igniting conversation. Perspective pieces contribute to larger discussions by providing individual points of view. Other types consist of brief correspondence, case studies, articles, and letters. Research priorities and dissemination tactics are influenced by the trends, variety, and gaps in the literature that are identified by this study, which also provides information to publishers, funders, and researchers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, the research article paper type has the highest number of articles (69 publications), followed by reviews (18 publications) and books (4 publications). The majority of publications (more than 91% of articles) are reviews and research articles.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.3 Comparative Analysis of Literature Across Journals\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluating the literature on forest plant diversity monitoring using remote sensing is essential to knowing the state of the field and identifying reputable journals. Distribution and significance in this discipline are revealed by comparison of published articles. It assesses recognition, involvement, and interest in particular journals. Variations promote prestigious publications to help academics keep current and submit their work. The evaluation points up gaps, which directs additional study and motivates attention to fill them. It measures broadness and depth, giving a summary and emphasizing key journals that have shaped knowledge. Overall, there are 48 journals that have published articles on the review's topic. Books, student theses, and yearly conferences like the EGU General Assembly are among the other publications covered in this review article. Almost all of these materials are indexed in databases that focus on books, theses, and conference proceedings, including Scopus or the Conference Proceedings Citation Index. The scientific community benefits from increased visibility and discoverability of conference abstracts and presentations because of this indexing. The rest of the files in this review are preprints, which are academic articles or research manuscripts that are made available to the public before public scrutiny by peers and publication in a typical journal. Preprint servers, websites that facilitate the dissemination of research findings among scientists, are usually where preprints are posted. The following list includes the top six journals where more than two papers have been published.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the relationship between journal names and the number of published articles, revealing publishing trends and differences among journals. The y-axis represents journal names, while the x-axis shows the number of articles. Notably, journals like the Remote Sensing Journal, with 14 publications, and the Forests Journal, with 5, indicate active engagement and broader author reach. In contrast, more specialized journals, such as the Conservation Biology Journal with only 2 publications, focus on high-quality, niche research. The graph also highlights clusters of journals with similar publication volumes and outliers with disproportionately high or low article counts. However, the graph alone does not fully assess journal quality; it should be evaluated alongside factors such as reputation, peer review processes, indexing, and citation metrics. Ultimately, this analysis indicates that the journals highlighted in the review maintain high quality and significantly impact the assessment of forest plant diversity through remote sensing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.4 Number of publications per publisher companies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe total number of publisher companies related to the topic of the review is 31. The top seven publisher organizations are listed below, along with the number of articles each publisher organization has published. As Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e illustrates, the number of publications that each publisher has published has been evaluated in this review work. As a result, out of the total articles published, MDPI Academic Publishing Company has published the majority (28 articles) of the publications, followed by Wiley (13 articles), and Springer Nature (11 articles), and Elsevier (6 articles).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.5 Publications across country and continent\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalyzing the spatial trends in remote sensing-based forest plant diversity literature reveals the distribution and research productivity across continents and nations, highlighting regions of strong research output and areas needing more work or funding. Higher publication rates in continents like Europe and North America, particularly in specific countries, suggest potential for collaboration, while regions with fewer publications indicate unexplored research topics. This helps guide financing, research, and conservation initiatives in the future. Thus, this analysis offers a broad picture that directs future research objectives and field collaborations. The review indicates that papers related to forest plant diversity have been published across six continents. Europe leads with 44 publications, followed by Asia with 25 articles, North America with 12, and Africa with 6. This shows a strong focus in Europe, while other continents exhibit varying levels of research output, with South America and Australia having the fewest publications. The literature on remote sensing of forest biodiversity has been published from 39 different nations. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e displays the countries where more than two articles have been published. Accordingly, India (9 publications), China (8 publications), and Italy (7 publications) are the research area countries with the most publications, followed by Germany and the United States of America (6 publications each).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.6 Publications by forest type\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTropical forests, located near the equator in regions like Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, are the hottest and rainiest forests, known for their high biodiversity, including species like the African forest elephant. They face severe threats from deforestation and poaching [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Boreal forests, or taiga, found in northern Asia, Europe, and North America, endure harsh winters and have lower biodiversity. Dominated by conifers and acidic soils, these forests are crucial carbon sinks but are threatened by climate change and habitat loss affecting species like the boreal caribou [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Temperate forests, found in mid-latitude regions such as eastern North America, experience four seasons and contain a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees. These fertile forests support diverse wildlife but face habitat loss, endangering species like the northern spotted owl and red wolf [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. According to this review work, the majority of examined articles associated with forest plant diversity monitoring take place in temperate forests (61%), with tropical forests coming in second (22%), and boreal forests coming in third (17%) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.7 Publications across remote sensing sensors\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbout 47% of all sensor platform used in the reviewed studies are Space-borne (Orbital) sensor platform, whereas the remaining 53% are Airborne (Suborbital) Sensors platform, emphasizing the focus on airborne sensor platform diversity to estimate forest biodiversity. About 50% of all the sensor types used in the reviewed studies are active remote sensing sensors. Passive sensors also constitute about 50% of all the sensors (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). As demonstrated in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eLight\u003c/span\u003e Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), which constitutes 27% is the most widely used remote sensing technology in the reviewed literature, followed by Sentinel-2 MSI (21%), Airborne laser scanning(ALS) (11%), Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (18%), and Rapid eye, SPOT, and IKONOS (each making up 2%).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"\" width=\"581\" height=\"563\"\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.8 Publications per method used\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the findings of the literature analysis, the majority of papers (72%) use only sensors to assess the diversity of forest plants. This is followed by the use of sensors and field surveys (15%), sensors and machine learning/algorithms (11%), and sensors and GIS (2%) as noticed in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e. An overview of the methodologies and sensor types used to measure the variety of forest plants is given in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, which will help to clarify the role played by satellite and aircraft remote sensing as well as fieldwork in validating the results of remotely sensed data. While the field survey method (15%) was not included in the majority of reviewed studies, other researchers, such as Kacic \u0026amp; Kuenzer [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e], have reaffirmed that a field survey ought to be included in these kinds of papers because it is essential for validating all sensor data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Forest plant diversity and potential threats\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eForest plant diversity is an important aspect of ecosystem functioning and conservation. Several studies have investigated plant diversity in different forest ecosystems and identified potential threats to this diversity. For example, studies in mountainous ecosystems have found that deforestation is a major threat to forest cover change and woody plant species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. In forest ecosystems, there has been a focus on studying tree diversity, but recent research has highlighted the importance of studying herbaceous plant diversity as well [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Fragmentation of forest habitats is another major threat to plant diversity, as it leads to the loss of suitable habitats for forest specialists and facilitates the invasion of alien species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, human activities such as land-use change, selective logging, and climate change are impacting forest plant communities and their diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. Overall, understanding and addressing these threats is crucial for the conservation and management of forest plant diversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 The methods used for monitoring forest biodiversity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMonitoring forest plant biodiversity can be done using various methods, including traditional and advanced techniques. Traditional methods involve field measurements and direct observation of plant species richness and diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Advanced methods utilize remote sensing technology, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellite imagery, to assess vegetation biodiversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. These methods can provide valuable information on species composition, abundance, and distribution across different spatial and temporal scales. For example, UAV remote sensing can be used to estimate forest species diversity indices by classifying spectral data or clustering biochemical and structural features. Remote sensing sensors, such as multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, are commonly used to analyze spectral diversity and vegetation indices as proxies for forest biodiversity. These advanced methods offer the advantage of large-scale monitoring and the ability to detect changes in habitat quality and species diversity over time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional forest plant diversity assessment encompasses a range of methodological approaches that have been fundamental in understanding forest ecosystems. These methods include measuring tree species richness through distance sampling from community nuclei [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e], implementing quadrat surveys in agroforestry systems [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e], and conducting surveys and interviews with local healers to document medicinal plant diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. However, traditional assessment methods face significant limitations despite their benefits. While these approaches effectively document specific threats like hunting and invasive species that might be missed by remote sensing alone [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e], they are often time-consuming and require specialized expertise. As noted by Mammides et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], traditional morphological proxies for taxon identification necessitate trained botanists and vegetation scientists, which limits the seasonal scope of monitoring activities. Pascher et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e] highlight that these conventional methods may fail to capture the complete temporal and spatial resolution of biodiversity, particularly in detecting rare or elusive taxa.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of assessment methods in conservation has led to innovative solutions that effectively address existing limitations, particularly through the integration of remote sensing (RS) technologies with environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis. This combination marks a significant advancement in monitoring strategies, enhancing our ability to link habitat characteristics with species distribution, as highlighted by studies from Ariza et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e] and Capurso et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. Emerging technologies show great potential to supplement or even replace traditional monitoring approaches while preserving the valuable aspects of conventional methods. This integration suggests a promising future where comprehensive assessments of forest plant diversity harness the strengths of both modern and traditional techniques, ultimately enhancing the conservation and management of forest resources. Early adoption of remote sensing technology\u0026mdash;especially through Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 MSI imagery\u0026mdash;combined with ground-truthing data has significantly broadened the spatial scope of these assessments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, these methods have proven invaluable in fostering stakeholder cooperation, facilitating real-time species identification, and documenting essential information about growth forms, phenology, and ecological interactions, enriching our understanding of forest ecosystems and empowering more effective conservation efforts. The advanced techniques of forest plant diversity assessment are illustrated in detail below.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeographic Information System (GIS) techniques have been used to assess and monitor forest plant diversity. Krigas et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e] and Salehi and Ahmadian [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e] confirmed that Geographic information systems (GIS) are widely used to analyze potential and actual spatial-temporal distribution, location, distribution patterns, population assessment, and the identification of priority regions for management and conservation. These techniques involve the use of satellite remote sensing data, such as Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images, to map and predict plant diversity over large forest areas. Machine learning models, including Random Forests (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), have been applied to analyze the spectral and radar data from these satellite images and accurately predict forest tree species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, GIS technology has been used to map the distribution of invasive species and track their spread, using remote sensing data such as NDVI indices and radiometric space data from Sentinel-1 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. These techniques provide valuable information for the conservation and management of forest resources, allowing for the identification of critical habitats and the development of conservation plans [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]. For some species, ecological niche models have currently been developed and mapped using soil, bioclimatic, topographic, and land use factors [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. Nevertheless, GIS has several drawbacks, including expensive software and hardware, the inability to capture GIS data, and challenges in using it [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote sensing has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring and assessing forest biodiversity, offering spatial and temporal observations at various scales with cost-effective and flexible approaches [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. The technology encompasses multiple platforms and methods, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors for estimating forest species diversity indices [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. Advanced classification methods, such as the spectral angle mapper (SAM) approach, enable accurate predictions of species richness and Shannon-Wiener index through spectral information analysis at the individual canopy scale [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. The integration of multiple data sources, including Sentinel-2 mission data with its spectral bands and photosynthetic indices time series, has enhanced biodiversity assessment capabilities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Machine learning applications, particularly Random Forests and Deep Neural Networks, have further improved the analysis of multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 imagery for predicting forest tree species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Remote sensing offers substantial benefits for forest biodiversity monitoring, significantly enhancing research and conservation efforts with unique, information-rich insights [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. It provides a flexible and cost-effective method for gathering data on forest species diversity indices, such as species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, it facilitates the integration of ground-based surveys, airborne laser scanning, and imaging spectroscopy, enabling researchers to explore functional diversity-productivity relationships at various spatial scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, data from remote sensing, particularly from sensors like Sentinel-2, can derive reliable proxies for biological diversity, aiding in the identification of potential biodiversity hotspots and supporting cost-effective monitoring and forest management [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. Lastly, remote sensing data, including multispectral imagery and synthetic aperture radar, allows for the extrapolation of forest resource models over large areas, supporting strategic, tactical, and operational planning in forest resource management [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. However, significant challenges persist in the application of remote sensing for forest diversity monitoring. Fassnacht et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e] identified the scale- and ecosystem-dependent relationship between spectral heterogeneity and tree species diversity as a major obstacle in mapping forest diversity over large and mixed forest areas. The requirement for extensive field surveys to support multi-taxonomic studies remains a significant limitation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Technical challenges include variations in accuracy depending on the chosen method; while classification methods based on spectral information at individual canopy scale provide higher accuracy, they demand intensive data collection and processing [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. The clustering method, though faster in acquiring forest diversity patterns, may introduce uncertainties [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Lines et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e] emphasize the need for standardized approaches and benchmarking datasets to enhance the reliability and efficiency of remote sensing applications in forest diversity monitoring.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote sensing techniques commonly used for biodiversity assessment include satellite imagery, LiDAR, hyperspectral imaging, radar imagery, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These techniques provide valuable information for monitoring and assessing biodiversity at different spatial and temporal scales. Satellite systems specifically designed for global biodiversity assessment and monitoring are being launched, and they combine remote sensing with ground observations to develop reliable and interpretable products [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e]. Multispectral imaging technology from commercially available UAVs has been used to estimate biodiversity metrics at a fine spatial resolution, reducing sampling time and providing high-resolution monitoring [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e104\u003c/span\u003e]. Spaceborne and airborne sensors provide information at unprecedented spatial resolutions, allowing for the study of functional diversity changes over different scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, remote monitoring methods, including AI and machine learning algorithms, are being used to enhance the efficiency of current techniques for biodiversity conservation and monitoring [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSatellite imagery techniques for forest plant diversity assessment involve using multispectral, hyperspectral, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images to map vegetation biodiversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. These images facilitate the computation of various vegetation indices and SAR products, which are analyzed through abundance-based metrics and agent-based models to quantify biodiversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Networks, utilize multi-temporal satellite images to predict forest tree species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e]. Neural network approaches enhance tree species classification by adjusting markup and improving sampling techniques (Muise et al., 2022). Additionally, remote sensing data assess the representation of protected areas by examining topography, forest disturbances, and structural attributes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. The Sentinel-2 mission shows great potential in producing reliable proxies for biological diversity in forest ecosystems. Satellite imagery provides advantages, such as accurately predicting forest tree species diversity using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2 images, achieving average accuracies of 78% for indices like Simpson, Shannon, and Pielou [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e], and enabling regular monitoring through current Earth Observation missions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. However, it also presents challenges; forestry applications require automatic markup adjustments and improved sampling techniques for enhanced tree species classification [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, there is a lack of studies combining vertical structure information and multi-temporal phenological characteristics to quantify diversity in large, heterogeneous forest areas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiDAR is a key remote sensing technique for mapping biodiversity, offering precise insights into the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem structure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e]. It monitors vital biodiversity variables such as community composition, vegetation structure, and canopy diversity from space [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Drones equipped with LiDAR facilitate automated large-area scanning, producing accurate 3D images [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e] and estimating local biodiversity across various habitats, correlating well with important biodiversity drivers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]. LiDAR has several advantages, including capturing historical land use impacts, aiding in understanding biotic responses to environmental changes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e], and providing valuable insights into understorey plant composition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e]. It's also useful for assessing forest conservation status in biodiversity-rich areas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e] and enhancing habitat mapping [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e]. However, LiDAR presents challenges, such as high costs and time-consuming data processing requiring specialized expertise [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e], and it may struggle in dense vegetation or complex terrains, affecting accuracy. Despite these limitations, LiDAR remains a valuable tool for understanding and conserving ecosystems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHyperspectral imaging techniques are increasingly used for assessing forest plant diversity, providing a flexible and cost-effective solution for large-scale biodiversity monitoring [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e]. UAVs equipped with hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors can estimate forest species diversity indices [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Methods such as spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification and self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering have been compared [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e], with the former showing better performance in predicting species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e]. Conversely, clustering methods utilize biochemical and structural features to quickly identify forest diversity patterns without specifying tree species. Hyperspectral imaging also analyzes plant phenology and soil-vegetation interactions through various vegetation indices [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e]. Statistical techniques, like analysis of variance and random forests, help differentiate invasive and weed species in agrocenoses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e]. Airborne remote sensing, including passive hyperspectral and active LiDAR data, maps biodiversity patterns across forest biomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e]. Machine learning algorithms, such as Gaussian processes regression, show promise in estimating forest biophysical parameters like leaf area index (LAI) using hyperspectral data [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite its advantages, hyperspectral imaging has limitations. While hyperspectral imaging can identify invasive species and quantify biodiversity effects on stem biomass and canopy nitrogen (67], which are crucial for understanding plant growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e71\u003c/span\u003e], it relies on technologically challenging spectral and spatially resolved measurements [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e72\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, processing hyperspectral data requires specialized analysis methods.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRadar imagery remote sensing techniques have been effectively used to assess forest plant diversity, demonstrating sensitivity comparable to airborne laser scanning (ALS) in measuring forest structure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Studies utilizing Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data achieved overall accuracies of 67.4% for Simpson diversity and 64.2% for Shannon-Wiener diversity in a subtropical forest. Nico et al., [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e] mapped vegetation biodiversity in Southern Italian National Parks using multispectral, hyperspectral, and SAR satellite images along with abundance-based metrics and an agent-based model [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e73\u003c/span\u003e]. Additional research found that higher tree height variation correlates with increased tree species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR103\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e103\u003c/span\u003e], while combining GEDI LiDAR data with Sentinel-2 imagery identified foliage height diversity and spectral bands as key variables for diversity estimation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Nico et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e] mapped vegetation biodiversity in Southern Italian National Parks using multispectral, hyperspectral, and SAR satellite images along with abundance-based metrics and an agent-based model [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e73\u003c/span\u003e]. These findings illustrate the effectiveness of radar techniques in biodiversity mapping. Radar methods offer advantages, such as providing accurate plant diversity information over large areas and performing well in habitat structure assessment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e74\u003c/span\u003e]. They also hold promise in predicting species composition for birds and saproxylic beetles [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e75\u003c/span\u003e] and calculating forest functional diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. However, limitations include lower accuracy in predicting diversity indices like Simpson and Shannon-Wiener compared to spectral data [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], and the need for machine learning algorithms to link radar data to ground-truthing indices, which can be computationally intensive [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, radar may provide less information on plant phenology compared to other remote sensing sources [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e]. These challenges necessitate complementary data sources and careful consideration of objectives in forest plant diversity assessments using radar data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUsing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for assessing forest plant biodiversity offers multiple benefits, including cost-effectiveness and the ability to navigate challenging terrain [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e76\u003c/span\u003e]. AVs can monitor wildlife poaching, illegal timber extraction, and track forest regeneration or degradation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. They also enable accurate monitoring of forest diversity indices, such as species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index, through hyperspectral and LiDAR data [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e77\u003c/span\u003e]. Combining multi-rotor and fixed-wing UAV imagery allows for precise mapping of tree species in complex environments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e78\u003c/span\u003e]. However, UAVs face challenges, such as reliance on GPS navigation, which is inadequate under forest canopies [22, 75, 79, 80). Additionally, using clustering algorithms for estimating diversity indices can introduce uncertainties, as they may not accurately capture specific tree species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e81\u003c/span\u003e]. UAV assessments often require spectral data from all dominant tree species at an individual canopy scale, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. These limitations underscore the need for further research to enhance UAV-based biodiversity assessments. Despite these challenges, UAVs hold significant potential for monitoring forest plant biodiversity, especially amid increasing climate change impacts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe following figure (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e) illustrates the integration of remote sensing technologies and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for analyzing forest distribution and biodiversity, specifically focusing on forest plant diversity. It distinguishes between passive remote sensing methods, such as satellite imagery, and active methods, like laser scanning (LiDAR). The process combines data from various sources, including ground-based measurements and drone-based LiDAR systems, to create detailed digital terrain models (DTMs) and 3D point clouds. The GIS component supports data management and spatial analysis, incorporating various data layers (e.g., land cover, wetlands). Precise geolocation through GPS and inertial measurement units (IMUs) is emphasized for accurate mapping and analysis. Overall, the figure highlights a comprehensive approach to monitoring and managing forest ecosystems using advanced technology.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe figure is adapted from Kerry et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. Abbreviations: FP-mode, first-pulse mode; LP-mode, last-pulse mode; DEM, digital elevation model; DTM, digital terrain model.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo sum up, monitoring forest plant biodiversity involves traditional and advanced techniques, summarized in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, which compares these methods based on their characteristics, advantages, and limitations. The choice between traditional and advanced methods depends on the specific objectives of the monitoring effort, available resources, and the scale of the study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA Summary of Traditional vs. Advanced Methods for Monitoring Forest Plant diversity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethod Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethod\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCharacteristics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdvantages\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimitations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"2\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTraditional\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eField Surveys\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDirect observation and measurement of plant species richness and diversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Encourages stakeholder cooperation\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Real-time species identification\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Time-consuming\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Requires trained botanists\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuadrat Surveys\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSampling method to assess species composition in defined areas.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Detailed local data collection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Limited spatial coverage\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- May miss rare species\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterviews with Local Healers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGathering knowledge on medicinal plant diversity from community members.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Provides cultural insights into plant use\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Subjective data; may not be comprehensive\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdvanced\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote Sensing (UAVs, Satellites)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUse of aerial imagery and satellite data to assess vegetation biodiversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Large-scale monitoring\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Cost-effective and flexible\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- May miss ground-level details\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Requires technical expertise\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiDAR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLight Detection and Ranging for mapping vegetation structure and biodiversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- High-resolution 3D data\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Effective in dense forests\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Expensive and complex data processing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHyperspectral Imaging\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaptures detailed spectral information to identify plant species and health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Can differentiate between species\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Useful for assessing ecosystem functions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Requires specialized equipment and analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeographic Information Systems (GIS)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalyzes spatial data to map and predict plant diversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Integrates various data sources\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Identifies priority conservation areas\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- High costs for software and hardware\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMachine Learning Models\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlgorithms used to analyze remote sensing data for predicting species diversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Enhances predictive accuracy\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Can process large datasets efficiently\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Requires extensive training data and computational resources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs the following tables show, by evaluating research, details such as the type of forest or each study area, the primary goals, the variables examined (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e), and the algorithms, classifiers, or indices (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), sensor\u0026rsquo; type (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) and methods used (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e) are explored.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of forest type, objectives, and variables studied\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAspect\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetails\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTypes of Forests\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies have been conducted in various forest types, including temperate, subtropical, and urban (agro-forestry) systems. UAVs and remote sensing techniques are notably used in subtropical forests for assessing biodiversity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMain Objectives\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eClassification of Species\u003c/b\u003e: Identifying and categorizing different plant species.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePrediction of Biodiversity Metrics\u003c/b\u003e: Estimating indices like species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMapping and Monitoring Changes\u003c/b\u003e: Tracking changes in species composition and habitat quality over time, especially in response to environmental stressors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariables Studied\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSpecies Richness\u003c/b\u003e: Number of different species in an area.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAbundance\u003c/b\u003e: Number of each species\u0026rsquo; individuals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eVegetation Indices\u003c/b\u003e: Metrics like NDVI derived from remote sensing data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStructural Attributes\u003c/b\u003e: Physical characteristics such as canopy height and density that influence biodiversity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of algorithms and indices used in assessing forest plant diversity via remote sensing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAspect\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetails\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClassification Algorithms\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRandom Forest (RF)\u003c/b\u003e: Utilized for predicting species diversity from remote sensing data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB)\u003c/b\u003e: A machine learning approach for biodiversity prediction\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eDeep Neural Networks (DNN)\u003c/b\u003e: Employed for analyzing complex datasets obtained from remote sensing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndices for Biodiversity Assessment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSpecies Richness\u003c/b\u003e: The count of different species present in a specific area.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eShannon-Wiener Index\u003c/b\u003e: Measures species diversity by considering both abundance and evenness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSimpson Index\u003c/b\u003e: Evaluates the probability that two randomly selected individuals from a sample belong to the same species\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of key types of sensors and approaches used in forest plant diversity assessment through remote sensing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSatellite Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultispectral Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCapture data across multiple wavelengths (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2); useful for vegetation classification.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHyperspectral Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCapture hundreds of narrow bands for detailed spectral analysis (e.g., AVIRIS, EnMAP).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiDAR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides 3D information about forest structure, canopy height, and density.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAerial Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrones (UAVs)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEquipped with multispectral and hyperspectral cameras for high-resolution data collection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFixed-Wing Aircraft\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUsed for larger areas; can carry advanced sensors for detailed mapping.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGround-Based Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSoil and Weather Sensors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeasure environmental variables like moisture, temperature, and nutrients.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTerrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides precise 3D models of forest structure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of approaches used in forest plant diversity assessment through remote sensing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImage Processing Techniques\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClassification Algorithms\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupervised and unsupervised methods for classifying vegetation types.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChange Detection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentifying changes in forest cover and species composition over time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMachine Learning\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictive Modeling\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUsing algorithms to predict plant diversity based on environmental and spectral data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDeep Learning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNeural networks for advanced image classification and feature extraction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEcological Modeling\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecies Distribution Models (SDMs)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegrates remote sensing data with ecological and climate data to predict species distributions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional Diversity Assessments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluates ecosystem functions based on the diversity of plant traits.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegration of Data Sources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGIS (Geographic Information Systems)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCombines remote sensing data with ground-truthing data for comprehensive analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Fusion Techniques\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMerges data from different sensors for enhanced analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eField Validation\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGround Truthing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollecting field data to validate remote sensing results and improve model accuracy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote sensing has emerged as a vital tool for monitoring forest biodiversity, with various methods demonstrating differing accuracy levels. The accuracy of these methods is influenced by factors such as sensor type, spectral and spatial resolution, and the indices used for biodiversity assessment. A table that summarizes the accuracy values for the several techniques employed in forest biodiversity monitoring is shown below (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab7\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 7\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of accuracy values for various methods used in forest biodiversity monitoring\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethod\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccuracy/Performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUAV-borne Hyperspectral and LiDAR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh precision in species identification and diversity estimation, with accuracies exceeding 85% for species classification in complex forest environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSatellite Imagery (Sentinel-1 \u0026amp; Sentinel-2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariable accuracy; up to 90% for tree species mapping when combined with machine learning algorithms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiDAR Technology\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEstimates of above-ground biomass (AGB) with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values ranging from 10\u0026ndash;20%, depending on forest structure and density.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTerrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh-resolution data achieving accuracies often above 90% for metrics such as tree height and crown dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultispectral Imaging\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenerally yields lower accuracies, around 70\u0026ndash;80% for vegetation classification, compared to hyper-spectral methods.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRemote sensing-based forest diversity assessment relies on various biodiversity parameters and indicators. These include species richness, Shannon's entropy, Simpson's diversity, and vegetation cover [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e82\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, functional diversity metrics such as plant functional traits and spectral diversity have been explored [14, 27). The use of remote sensing data allows for the estimation and mapping of these diversity indices at different spatial and temporal scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e83\u003c/span\u003e]. Spectral information content, vegetation indices, and spectral species have been identified as important concepts for assessing forest biodiversity using remote sensing. Geodiversity variables, such as topographic and soil characteristics, have also been found to be valuable in combination with remote sensing features for accurate diversity estimation. Overall, a combination of these parameters and indicators provides a comprehensive approach for remote sensing-based forest diversity assessment, enabling effective monitoring and management of biodiversity. The following is a table (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e) summarizing the key information extracted from the studies analyzed, highlighting the parameters and indicators used to assess biodiversity, forest structure, and health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab8\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 8\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameters and Indicators Used\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCategory\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameters and Indicators\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecies Diversity Indices\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommonly used indices include the Shannon-Wiener Index, Simpson Index, and species richness metrics, which quantify biodiversity within forest ecosystems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStructural Parameters\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportant metrics for assessing forest structure and health include tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), crown area, and canopy cover.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHealth Condition Indicators\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndicators such as leaf area index (LAI), chlorophyll content, and spectral reflectance indices, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), are utilized to monitor forest health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4 Selected Case Studies for Detailed Discussion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis section examines selected case studies that demonstrate how remote sensing evaluates forest plant diversity parameters, providing detailed analysis of study areas, methods, findings, and limitations across different ecosystems. Case studies offer specific examples of how remote sensing is used to monitor forest diversity in a range of environments, such as wetlands, temperate forests, and tropical rainforests. These studies demonstrate how well remote sensing methods work for mapping and identifying various tree species, measuring canopy cover and height in forests, and evaluating diversity indicators like species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index. Table S1 lists a number of exemplary publications of case studies and review papers that use remote sensing to demonstrate how forest diversity metrics are monitored across various ecosystems. In the table, study area, overview, methodology, findings, and limitations of each publication are discussed. For example, remote sensing and terrestrial biosphere modeling were integrated in the study by Schneider et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e] to explore the relationship between functional diversity and productivity in a heterogeneous forest ecosystem in Switzerland. Pangtey et al. used multi-date Sentinel-2 NDVI to estimate tree diversity in a seasonal tropical forest and found that Rao's Q index derived from NDVI showed a higher correlation with tree diversity during the leaf flushing period [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e84\u003c/span\u003e]. Li et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e] compared spectral angle mapper (SAM) classification and self-adaptive Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering methods using UAV-borne hyperspectral and LiDAR data to estimate forest species diversity indices in subtropical forest areas in China, revealing that the classification method outperformed in predicting species richness and Shannon-Wiener index. Ren et al. used GEDI LiDAR data and Sentinel-2 imagery to estimate forest diversity in temperate natural forests and found that foliage height diversity, spectral bands, and vegetation indices were important variables for predicting diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e85\u003c/span\u003e]. Xi et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e] employed multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2 imagery along with machine learning models to predict forest tree species diversity in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest area in northeast China, revealing that a deep neural network model and multi-temporal data yielded favorable results. Kacic and Kuenzer reviewed the concepts of remotely sensed spectral diversity for forest biodiversity monitoring, focusing on vegetation indices, spectral information content, and spectral species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. These studies demonstrate the use of remote sensing data from various sources, such as airborne and spaceborne sensors, to assess forest plant diversity parameters in different ecosystems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5 Challenges and Future Directions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5.1 Challenges and limitations of remote sensing in Forest plant diversity monitoring\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere are currently several challenges and limitations facing remote sensing in the assessment of forest plant diversity. One major challenge is the availability of data, as there may be limitations on the habitats and species information in urban areas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e]. Another challenge is the scale mismatch between remote sensing data and ground observations, as global biodiversity observatory systems need to combine remote sensing with ground observations to develop reliable and interpretable products [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e82\u003c/span\u003e]. Spectral confusion is another limitation, as the spectral diversity obtained from plant communities may not directly correspond to different facets of biodiversity, such as taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e86\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, the limited or coarse spatial resolution of remote sensing data, changes in remotely sensed reflectance data over time, and weak linkages between species counts and spectral diversity in agricultural landscapes can negatively impact the estimation of plant diversity using spectral diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e87\u003c/span\u003e]. These challenges and limitations highlight the need for further research and development in remote sensing techniques for biodiversity assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey research areas, such as sensor calibration and image correction, spectral signatures and feature extraction, species-level classification algorithms, scale and resolution challenges, validation and ground truthing, integration of data sources could address the existing limitations and improving the precision and practicality of remote sensing in forest plant diversity assessment. The research area of sensor calibration and image correction aims to develop robust techniques for ensuring consistent radiometric and geometric accuracy across different sensors and platforms, as well as exploring image correction methods, such as atmospheric correction, to minimize errors and improve the quality of remote sensing data [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e88\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e89\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e90\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e91\u003c/span\u003e], ultimately enhancing the accuracy of plant diversity assessment. The research area of Spectral Signature Analysis and feature extraction aims to improve plant species identification and diversity assessment accuracy by extracting meaningful features from remote sensing data, reducing noise, and enhancing discriminatory power in classification algorithms [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e92\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR93\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e93\u003c/span\u003e]. The research area of advanced or species-level classification algorithms, such as k-nearest neighbor aims to accurately identify and classify tree species using machine learning and deep learning approaches (e.g., Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, Convolutional Neural Networks) with remote sensing data for improved diversity assessment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e94\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e95\u003c/span\u003e]. Fusion of multispectral imagery (MSI), panchromatic imagery (PAN), and LiDAR data at the feature and decision levels has shown significant improvements in tree species classification compared to using these data sources individually [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Graph convolution networks (GCNs) have also been used for tree species classification by fusing hyperspectral images (HSIs) and multispectral images (MSIs) through canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and graph node fusion (Wang et al., 2023). Additionally, the use of self-attention mechanism networks (SAN) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in parallel with image super-resolution reconstruction techniques has improved classification accuracy for forest tree species using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing imagery [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR102\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e102\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, the PointNet\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;algorithm has been applied to point cloud data from airborne LiDAR for tree species classification, with enhanced down-sampling and multi-scale sampling and grouping (MSG) methods yielding improved results [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e94\u003c/span\u003e]. Finally, the development of fractal geometry-based and quantitative structural model (QSM)-based feature vectors has shown effective improvements in tree species classification using LiDAR technology [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e95\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research area on addressing scale and resolution challenges in remote sensing improves plant diversity assessment accuracy by investigating upscaling, downscaling, multi-scale information techniques, and sensor data integration, bridging the gap between field-based observations and remote sensing data across spatial scales [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e96\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e97\u003c/span\u003e]. The validation and ground truthing research area develops standardized protocols for ground truth data collection, including field surveys, plot inventories, and species identification, to accurately validate remote sensing-derived metrics and models for reliable plant diversity assessments [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR98\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e98\u003c/span\u003e]. The data sources integration research area explores effective methods to integrate diverse data sources, such as hyperspectral imagery, LiDAR data, and ancillary information, to enhance accuracy and applicability in remote sensing-based plant diversity assessment, improving precision and practicality (65, 82, 83, 15, 99]. These methods aim to combine different types of data to provide a comprehensive understanding of plant diversity at various spatial and temporal scales. By integrating data from multiple sources, researchers can obtain more reliable and detailed information about plant species composition, distribution, and ecosystem functioning [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR100\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e100\u003c/span\u003e]. This integration allows for a more holistic approach to biodiversity monitoring and conservation planning, enabling the identification of biodiversity hotspots, the detection of invasive species, and the assessment of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. Taken as a whole, the integration of diverse data sources in remote sensing-based plant diversity assessment provides valuable insights for effective management and conservation of biodiversity. In general, addressing sensor calibration, spectral signature analysis, classification algorithms, scale and resolution challenges, validation, and data integration improves remote sensing accuracy and applicability in assessing forest plant diversity, leading to better understanding of ecosystems and informed conservation decisions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5.2 Advancements in Remote Sensing for Monitoring Forest Plant Diversity: Future Prospects and Potential Developments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture developments and advancements in remote sensing technologies and methodologies for monitoring forest plant diversity include the use of satellite systems specifically designed for global biodiversity assessment and monitoring [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e]. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology is also being increasingly used for monitoring forest species diversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Concepts of remotely sensed spectral diversity, such as vegetation indices, spectral information content, and spectral species, show promise for the consistent and multi-temporal analysis of forest biodiversity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Challenges that need to be addressed include user uptake, technical challenges related to forest inventories, and map validation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. Multi-source data fusion, such as satellite and UAV/drone data fusion, can provide more accurate and comprehensive forest classification and monitoring [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e101\u003c/span\u003e]. Future research trends in remote sensing for forest management include the integration of diverse teams, global cooperation, and collaborations across disciplines. These developments and advancements in remote sensing technologies and methodologies will contribute to improved remote sensing capabilities and applications in various fields.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5 Conclusion and Outlooks","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis review paper provides a comprehensive overview of forest plant diversity assessment based on remote sensing, highlighting the importance of biodiversity in ecological systems. It emphasizes the role of plant diversity in maintaining the stability and functioning of forest ecosystems and underscores the need for biodiversity monitoring in conservation efforts and decision-making. Remote sensing data has emerged as a valuable tool for biodiversity research and conservation. It offers information-rich data and a flexible and cost-effective method for monitoring forest species diversity, identifying hotspots, and facilitating planning and monitoring in forest resource management. Advanced technologies like remote sensing, bioacoustics, and environmental DNA are promising approaches that can fill taxonomic and geographic data gaps. The paper discusses various remote sensing techniques employed in assessing forest plant diversity, including satellite imagery, LiDAR, hyperspectral imaging, radar imagery, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The benefits and drawbacks of these techniques are evaluated, along with the challenges in biodiversity monitoring, such as taxonomy gaps and spatial coverage limitations. The literature review reveals an increasing trend in publications on remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment, with a peak of 36 articles in 2023. Research articles constituted the majority (69), followed by reviews (18) and books (4). The review indicates the leading journals in the field, including Forests, Biodiversity and Conservation, Diversity, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and Conservation Biology, as well as the publishing companies MDPI, Wiley, Springer Nature, Elsevier, Taylor \u0026amp; Francis Group, Frontiers, and SPIE.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe publications were distributed across six continents, with Europe having the highest number, followed by Asia, North America, and Africa. Most studies focused on temperate forests, followed by tropical and boreal forests. Active remote sensing sensors were used in the majority of studies, with LiDAR being the most widely used technology. The challenges and limitations of remote sensing in forest plant diversity assessment, such as data availability, scale mismatch, spectral confusion, and limited spatial resolution, are discussed. Key research areas for improvement include sensor calibration, spectral signatures, species-level classification algorithms, and integration of data sources. Future trends in remote sensing for forest management involve collaboration, global cooperation, interdisciplinary approaches, and data fusion or integration to enhance capabilities and applications. In conclusion, this review paper provides valuable insights into remote sensing-based forest plant diversity assessment, highlighting the significance of biodiversity monitoring and the potential of advanced technologies. It identifies the current state of research, challenges, and future directions, contributing to the advancement of remote sensing applications in forest management and conservation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the findings of this review, it is recommended that stakeholders and researchers enhance their capacity for biodiversity monitoring, particularly in high-biodiversity countries with data gaps. This can be achieved by following best monitoring practices, adopting appropriate indicators, and making data openly available to enhance results-based management, conserve biodiversity, and sustain ecosystem services. Furthermore, there is a need for integrated, continuous, and accurate quantitative biodiversity assessments to mitigate the current rates of biodiversity loss. This requires collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to develop standardized protocols and methodologies for remote sensing-based forest plant diversity monitoring. In addition, further research is needed to explore the potential of advanced technologies such as remote sensing, bioacoustics, and environmental DNA in assessing forest plant diversity. This can help fill the existing data gaps and improve the accuracy of remote sensing approaches. Overall, the findings of this review highlight the importance of remote sensing in assessing forest plant diversity and provide valuable insights for future research and conservation efforts. By leveraging the power of remote sensing, we can better understand and protect the precious biodiversity of our forests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAswajith IS, Premlatha S (2022) A Study on Ecological Relevance with Specific Reference to Biodiversity and Conservation. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 10. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.47132\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.22214/ijraset.2022.47132\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Issue X\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGliessman S (2022) Why is ecological diversity important? Editorial. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis: Agroecology and sustainable food systems, 46 (3), 329\u0026ndash;330. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2032513\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/21683565.2022.2032513\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOguh CE, Obiwulu ENO, Umezinwa OJ, Ameh SE, Ugwu CV, andSheshi IM (2021) Ecosystem and Ecological Services; Need for Biodiversity Conservation-A Critical Review. Asian J Biology 11(4). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.9734/AJOB/2021/V11I430146\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.9734/AJOB/2021/V11I430146\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhush SG (2023) Biodiversity is nature's gift for the survival of the human race: Some reflections. Crop Environ 2(1):1\u0026ndash;4. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang Q, Wang L, Huang J, Lu L, Li Y, Du Y, Ling F (2022) Mapping plant diversity based on combined SENTINEL-1/2 Data\u0026mdash;Opportunities for subtropical mountainous forests. Remote Sens 14(3). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030492\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14030492\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh V (2024) Threats to Biodiversity. Textbook of Environment and Ecology. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 217\u0026ndash;224\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChapman M, Goldstein B, Schell C, Brashares J, Xu L, Ellis-Soto D, Norman K, Longdon J, Scoville C, Faxon H, Carter N, Goldstein J, O'Rourke D, Boettiger C (2023) The social and political dimensions of biodiversity monitoring. Vienna, Austria. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10547,2023\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10547,2023\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoersberger H, Valdez J, Martin GCJ, Junker J, Georgieva I, Bauer S, Beja P, Breeze DT, Fernandez M, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez N, Brotons L, Jandt U, Bruelheide H, Kissling WD, Langer C, Liquete C, Lumbierres M, Solheim AL, Maes J, Ordonez MA, Moreira F, Pe\u0026rsquo;er G, Santana J, Shamoun-Baranes J, Smets B, Capinha C, McCallum I, Pereira MH, Bonn A (2023) Biodiversity monitoring in Europe: user and policy needs. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.12.548673\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/2023.07.12.548673\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDalton DT, Berger V, Adams V, Botha J, Halloy S, Kirchmeir H, Jungmeier M (2023) A Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Monitoring Programs in Conservation Areas. Sustainability 15(8). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15086779\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su15086779\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStephenson PJ, Londo\u0026ntilde;o-Murcia MC, Borges PAV et al (2022) Louw Claassens, Heidrun Frisch-Nwakanma, Nicholas Ling, Sapphire McMullan-Fisher, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Kerrigan Marie Machado Unter, Judith L. Walls,. Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga MDPI: Diversity 14, no. 10: 824. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/d14100824\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/d14100824\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaamanen T, Norros V, Vihervaara P, Jerney J, Kortelainen P, Kujala K, Meissner K (2024) Technology Readiness Level of biodiversity monitoring with molecular methods\u0026ndash;where are we on the road to routine implementation? Preprint, 5. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e132214\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3897/arphapreprints.e132214\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHansen AJ, Noble BP, Veneros J, East A, Goetz SJ, Supples C, Watson JEM, Jantz PA, Pillay R, Jetz W, Ferrier S, Grantham HS, Evans TD, Ervin J, Venter O, Virnig ALS (2021) Toward monitoring forest ecosystem integrity within the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conserv Lett. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12822\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/conl.12822\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReddy CS (2021) Remote sensing of biodiversity: what to measure and monitor from space to species? Biodivers Conserv 30(10):2617\u0026ndash;2631. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-021-02216-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/S10531-021-02216-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi Q, Hu B, Shang J, Li H (2023) Fusion Approaches to Individual Tree Species Classification Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data. Forests 14(7). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/f14071392\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/f14071392\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchneider FD, Longo M, Paul-Limoges E, Scholl VM, Schmid B, Morsdorf F, Pavlick RP, Schimel DS, Schaepman ME, Moorcroft PR (2023) Remote sensing‐based forest modeling reveals positive effects of functional diversity on productivity at local spatial scale. J Geophys Research: Biogeosciences 128(6). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007421\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1029/2023JG007421\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParisi F, Vangi E, Francini S, D\u0026rsquo;Amico G, Chirici G, Marchetti M, Lombardi F, Travaglini D, Ravera S, Santis ED, Tognetti R (2023) Sentinel-2 time series analysis for monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity in mountain beech forests. Front Forests Global Change. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1020477\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1020477\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMassey R, Berner LT, Foster AC, Goetz SJ, Vepakomma U (2023) Remote Sensing Tools for Monitoring Forests and Tracking Their Dynamics. Boreal Forests in the Face of Climate Change: Sustainable Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 637\u0026ndash;655. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15988-6_26\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-031-15988-6_26\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKerry GR, Montalbo JF, Das R, Patra S, Mahapatra PG, Maurya KG, Atala NV, Jena B, Ukhurebor EK, Ukhurebor E, Jena CR, Gouda S, Majhi S, Rout RJ (2022) An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23242-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11356-022-23242-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNico G, Monaco M, Masci O (2023) Analysis of vegetation biodiversity by means of abundance-based metrics and agent-based models applied to spaceborne multispectral, hyperspectral and SAR images (No. EGU23-4477). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4477\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4477\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Copernicus Meetings\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRen C, Jiang H, Xi Y, Liu P, Li H (2023) Quantifying temperate forest diversity by integrating GEDI LiDAR and multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens 15(2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020375\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15020375\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlessi N, Bonari G, Zannini P, Jim\u0026eacute;nez-Alfaro B, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Chiarucci A (2023) Probabilistic and preferential sampling approaches offer integrated perspectives of Italian forest diversity. J Veg Sci 34(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13175\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jvs.13175\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi X, Zheng Z, Xu C, Zhao P, Chen J, Wu J, Zhao X, Mu X, Zhao D, Zeng Y (2023) Individual tree-based forest species diversity estimation by classification and clustering methods using UAV data. Front Ecol Evol. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1139458\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fevo.2023.1139458\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTekle T, Maryo M (2022) Ecological Assessment of Woody Plant Diversity and the Associated Threats in Afromontane Forest of Ambericho, Southern Ethiopia. J Landsc Ecol 15(2):102\u0026ndash;126. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2022-0013\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2478/jlecol-2022-0013\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDounias E (2018) Rainforest, Tropical. National Research Institute for Sustainable Development and Center for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1682\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1682\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKayes I, Mallik A (2020) Boreal Forests: Distributions, Biodiversity, and Management. Environmental Science, Biology. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_17-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_17-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDreiss LM, Volin JC Forests: Temperate Evergreen and Deciduous., Taylor, Francis (2014) \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1081/E-ENRL-120047447\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1081/E-ENRL-120047447\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKacic P, Kuenzer C (2022) Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Based on Remotely Sensed Spectral Diversity - A Review. Remote Sensing, Environmental Science. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215363\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14215363\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpicer ME, Radhamoni HVN, Duguid MC, Queenborough SA, Comita LS (2022) Herbaceous plant diversity in forest ecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and threats. Plant Ecol 223(2):117\u0026ndash;129. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/S11258-021-01202-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/S11258-021-01202-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUstymenko PM, Dubyna DV, Baranovskyi BO, Zhykharieva AV (2022) Rare diversity of forest vegetation of the steppe zone: current state, threats and directions of changes. Ecol Noospherology 33(2):55\u0026ndash;60. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.15421/032209\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.15421/032209\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKefalew A, Soromessa T, Demissew S (2022) Plant diversity and community analysis of Sele-Nono forest, Southwest Ethiopia: implication for conservation planning. Bot Stud 63(1):1\u0026ndash;26. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-022-00353-w\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s40529-022-00353-w\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eŠipek M, Kutnar L, Marinšek A, Šajna N (2022) Contrasting Responses of Alien and Ancient Forest Indicator Plant Species to Fragmentation Process in the Temperate Lowland Forests. Plants 11(23):3392. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233392\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/plants11233392\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStorch F, Boch S, Gossner MM, Feldhaar H, Ammer C, Schall P, Polle A, Kroiher F, M\u0026uuml;ller J, Bauhus J (2023) Linking structure and species richness to support forest biodiversity monitoring at large scales. Ann For Sci 80(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01169-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13595-022-01169-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAravanopoulos FA, Tourvas N, Malliarou E, Lyrou FG, Kotina VM, Farsakoglou AM (2022) Forest Genetic Monitoring in a Biodiversity Hotspot. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13127\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/IECF2022-13127\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMakhubele L, Araia MG, Chirwa PW (2023) Harvesting distance effect on tree species diversity in traditional agroforestry landscape: a case of Vhembe Biosphere Reserve in South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 32(10):3397\u0026ndash;3421. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02671-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10531-023-02671-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUlman Y, Singh M, Kumar A, Sharma M (2021) Conservation of plant diversity in agroforestry systems in a biodiversity hotspot region of northeast India. Agricultural Res 10(4):569\u0026ndash;581. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/S40003-020-00525-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/S40003-020-00525-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRattanapotanan N (2019) Plant Diversity and Utilization of Medicinal Plants by Traditional Healers. Naresuan Univ Journal: Sci Technol (NUJST) 27(1):55\u0026ndash;64. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.14456/nujst.2019.6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.14456/nujst.2019.6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarroll C, Noss RF, Dreiss LM, Hamilton H, Stein BA (2023) Four challenges to an effective national nature assessment. Conserv Biol 37(5). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14075\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/cobi.14075\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Version-1)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMammides C, Martini F, Kounnamas C (2022) Remote assessments of human pressure on biodiversity may miss important human threats. Integr Conserv 1(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.11\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/inc3.11\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePascher K, Švara V, Jungmeier M (2022) Environmental DNA-Based Methods in Biodiversity Monitoring of Protected Areas: Application Range, Limitations, and Needs. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi.org/10.3390/d14060463\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/d14060463\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAriza M, Fouks B, Mauvisseau Q, Halvorsen R, Alsos IG, de Boer HJ (2023) Plant biodiversity assessment through soil eDNA reflects temporal and local diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 14(2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13865\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/2041-210X.13865\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCapurso G, Carroll B, Stewart KA (2023) Transforming marine monitoring: Using eDNA metabarcoding to improve the monitoring of the Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas network. Mar Policy 156. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105807\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105807\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKrigas N, Papadimitriou K, Mazaris AD (2012) GIS and ex situ plant conservation. Application of Geographic Information Systems. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50525\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5772/50525\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSalehi F, Ahmadian L (2017) The application of geographic information systems (GIS) in identifying the priority areas for maternal care and services. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2423-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12913-017-2423-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXi Y, Zhang W, Brandt M, Tian Q, Fensholt R (2023) Mapping tree species diversity of temperate forests using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and-2 imagery. Sci Remote Sens. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2023.100094\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.srs.2023.100094\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFedoniuk TP, Skydan OV (2023) Incorporating geographic information technologies into a framework for biological diversity conservation and preventing biological threats to landscapes. Space Sci Technol 29(2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.02.010\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.15407/knit2023.02.010\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMudi S, Roy S, Das P, Pasha SV (2021) Development of a WebGIS platform to generate biodiversity data using citizen science approach. In Forest Resources Resilience and Conflicts (pp. 17\u0026ndash;31). Elsevier. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822931-6.00002-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/B978-0-12-822931-6.00002-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBariotakis M, Georgescu L, Laina D, Oikonomou I, Ntagounakis G, Koufaki MI, Souma M, Choreftakis M, Zormpa M, Smykal OG, Sourvinos P, Lionis G, Castanas C, Karousou E, R., \u0026amp;, Pirintsos SA (2019) From wild harvest towards precision agriculture: Use of Ecological Niche Modelling to direct potential cultivation of wild medicinal plants in Crete. Sci Total Environ. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133681\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133681\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBearman N, Jones N, Andr\u0026eacute; I, Cachinho HA, DeMers M (2016) The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. J Geogr High Educ 40(3):394\u0026ndash;408. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZheng Z, Li X, Xu C, Zhao P, Chen J, Wu J, Zeng Y (2023) Int Archives Photogrammetry Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 48:1929\u0026ndash;1934. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1929-2023\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1929-2023\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Individual Tree-Based Forest Species Diversity Estimation Using Uav-Borne Hyperspectral and LIDAR Data\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMa Y, Zhao Y, Im J, Zhao Y, Zhen Z (2024) A deep-learning-based tree species classification for natural secondary forests using unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral images and LiDAR. Ecol Ind 159. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111608\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111608\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFassnacht FE, White JC, Wulder MA, N\u0026aelig;sset E (2024) Remote sensing in forestry: Current challenges, considerations and directions. Forestry: Int J For Res 97(1):11\u0026ndash;37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad024\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/forestry/cpad024\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLines ER, Allen M, Cabo C, Calders K, Debus A, Grieve SW, Puliti S (2022), December AI applications in forest monitoring need remote sensing benchmark datasets. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4528\u0026ndash;4533). IEEE\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchweiger AK (2023) Remote Sensing of Biodiversity\u0026ndash;Current Challenges and Future Prospects, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15068\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15068\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJackson T, Fischer D, Vincent FJ, Eric G, Keller B, Chave MG, Jucker J, Coomes T, D.A (2024) Tall Bornean forests experience higher canopy disturbance rates than those in the eastern Amazon or Guiana shield. Glob Change Biol. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17493\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/gcb.17493\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRocchini D, Torresani M, Beierkuhnlein C, Feoli E, Foody GM, Lenoir J, Ricotta C (2022) Double down on remote sensing for biodiversity estimation: a biological mindset. Community Ecol 23(3):267\u0026ndash;276. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-022-00113-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s42974-022-00113-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIllarionova S, Trekin A, Ignatiev V, Oseledets I (2021) Tree species mapping on sentinel-2 satellite imagery with weakly supervised classification and object-wise sampling. Forests 12(10). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/f12101413\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/f12101413\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMuise ER, Coops NC, Hermosilla T, Ban SS (2022) Assessing representation of remote sensing derived forest structure and land cover across a network of protected areas. Ecol Appl 32(5). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2603\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/eap.2603\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAcebes P, Lillo P, Jaime-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez C (2021) Disentangling LiDAR contribution in modelling species\u0026ndash;habitat structure relationships in terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. A systematic review and future directions. Remote Sens 13(17). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173447\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs13173447\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDivya M, Chandran V, Pai D, Thankachan AD, Anagha AP, J (2022) Vegetation Scanning Using LiDAR-Based Drone. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng Inform Technol 275\u0026ndash;286. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT228145\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.32628/CSEIT228145\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoeslund JE, Zlinszky A, Ejrn\u0026aelig;s R, Brunbjerg AK, B\u0026oslash;cher PK, Svenning JC, Normand S (2019) LIDAR explains diversity of plants, fungi, lichens and bryophytes across multiple habitats and large geographic extent. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/509794\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/509794\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. BioRxiv\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLenoir J, Gril E, Durrieu S, Horen H, Laslier M, Lembrechts JJ, Decocq G (2022) Unveil the unseen: Using LiDAR to capture time-lag dynamics in the herbaceous layer of European temperate forests. J Ecol 110(2):282\u0026ndash;300. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13837\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/1365-2745.13837\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoeslund JE, Clausen KK, Dalby L, Fl\u0026oslash;jgaard C, P\u0026auml;rtel M, Pfeifer N, Brunbjerg AK (2023) Using airborne lidar to characterize North European terrestrial high-dark‐diversity habitats. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 9(3):354\u0026ndash;369. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.314\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/rse2.314\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParada-D\u0026iacute;az J, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez L\u0026oacute;pez \u0026Aacute;B, G\u0026oacute;mez Gonz\u0026aacute;lez LA, del Arco Aguilar MJ, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Mancebo JM (2022) Assessing the Usefulness of LiDAR for Monitoring the Structure of a Montane Forest on a Subtropical Oceanic Island. Remote Sens 14(4). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040994\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14040994\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTian Y, Huang H, Zhou G, Zhang Q, Xie X, Ou J, Lin J (2023) Mangrove Biodiversity Assessment Using UAV Lidar and Hyperspectral Data in China\u0026rsquo;s Pinglu Canal Estuary. Remote Sens 15(10). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102622\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15102622\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiccari F, Sigura M, Bacaro G (2022) Use of remote sensing techniques to estimate plant diversity within ecological networks: a worked example. Remote Sens 14(19):4933. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194933\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14194933\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuillaume R, Olivier F (2022) Remote sensing tools for plant invasions assessment in native tropical forests of a volcanic island. bioRxiv 2022\u0026ndash;2005. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.15.491984\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/2022.05.15.491984\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliams LJ, Cavender-Bares J, Townsend PA, Couture JJ, Wang Z, Stefanski A, Reich PB (2021) Remote spectral detection of biodiversity effects on forest biomass. Nat Ecol Evol 5(1):46\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01329-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41559-020-01329-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDmitriev PA, Kozlovsky BL, Kupriushkin DP, Dmitrieva AA, Rajput VD, Chokheli VA, Varduni TV (2022) Assessment of invasive and weed species by hyperspectral imagery in agrocenoses ecosystem. Remote Sens 14(10). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102442\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14102442\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKamoske AG, Dahlin KM, Read QD, Record S, Stark SC, Serbin SP, Zarnetske PL (2022) Towards mapping biodiversity from above: Can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 31(7):1440\u0026ndash;1460. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13516\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/geb.13516\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXie R (2020) Airborne hyperspectral data for estimation and mapping of forest leaf area index (Master's thesis, University of Twente). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://purl.utwente.nl/essays/84939\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/84939\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShiwen L, Steel L, Dahlsj\u0026ouml; CA, Peirson SN, Shenkin A, Morimoto T, Spitschan M (2021), September Hyperspectral characterisation of natural illumination in woodland and forest environments. In Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIV (Vol. 11815, pp. 32\u0026ndash;41). SPIE. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452949\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/2021.07.19.452949\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDominiak-Świgoń M, Olejniczak P, Nowak M, Lembicz M (2019) Hyperspectral imaging in assessing the condition of plants: strengths and weaknesses. Biodivers Res Conserv 55(1):25\u0026ndash;30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2019-0011\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2478/biorc-2019-0011\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLausch A, Heurich M, Magdon P, Rocchini D, Schulz K, Bumberger J, King DJ (2020) A range of earth observation techniques for assessing plant diversity. Remote Sens plant Biodivers 309\u0026ndash;348. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_13\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_13\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBae S, Levick SR, Heidrich L, Magdon P, Leutner BF, W\u0026ouml;llauer S, M\u0026uuml;ller J (2019) Radar vision in the mapping of forest biodiversity from space. Nat Commun 10(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12737-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41467-019-12737-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHambrecht L, Lucieer A, Malenovsk\u0026yacute; Z, Melville B, Ruiz-Beltran AP, Phinn S (2022) Considerations for Assessing Functional Forest Diversity in High-Dimensional Trait Space Derived from Drone-Based Lidar. Remote Sens 14(17). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174287\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14174287\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMillner N, Cunliffe AM, Mulero-P\u0026aacute;zm\u0026aacute;ny M, Newport B, Sandbrook C, Wich S (2023) Exploring the opportunities and risks of aerial monitoring for biodiversity conservation. Global Social Challenges J 1(aop):1\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1332/TIOK6806\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1332/TIOK6806\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShi S, Chen B, Bi S, Li J, Gong W, Sun J, Chen B, Du L, Yang J, Xu Q, Wang F, Song S (2023) A spatial\u0026ndash;spectral classification framework for multispectral LiDAR. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2208611\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10095020.2023.2208611\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun H, Yan H, Hassanalian M, Zhang J, Abdelkefi A (2023) Towards More Intell Appl Aerosp 10(3):317. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030317\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/aerospace10030317\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. UAV Platforms for Data Acquisition and Intervention Practices in Forestry:\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShithil SM, Faudzi AAM, Abdullah A, Islam N, Saad SM (2022), August Robust Sensor Fusion for Autonomous UAV Navigation in GPS denied Forest Environment. In 2022 IEEE 5th International Symposium in Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA) (pp. 1\u0026ndash;6). IEEE. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1109/ROMA55875.2022.9915682\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1109/ROMA55875.2022.9915682\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNgo D, Nguyen H, Dang C, Kolesnikov S (2020) UAV application for assessing rainforest structure in Ngoc Linh nature reserve, Vietnam. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 203, p. 03006). EDP Sciences. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020303006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1051/e3sconf/202020303006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuber A, Ramachandran V, Jaafar WSWM, Bajaj S, de-Miguel S, Cardil A, Doaemo W, Mohan M (2023) UAVs for monitoring responses of regenerating forests under increasing climate change-driven droughts - a review. Earth Environ Sci. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012030\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012030\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePacheco-Labrador J, de Bello F, Migliavacca M, Ma X, Carvalhais N, Wirth C (2023) A generalizable normalization for assessing plant functional diversity metrics across scales from remote sensing. Methods Ecol Evol 14(8):2123\u0026ndash;2136. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14163\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/2041-210X.14163\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRahmanian S, Nasiri V, Amindin A, Karami S, Maleki S, Pouyan S, Borz SA (2023) Remote Sens 15(2):387. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020387\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15020387\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Prediction of Plant Diversity Using Multi-Seasonal Remotely Sensed and Geodiversity Data in a Mountainous Area\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePangtey D, Padalia H, Bodh R, Rai ID, Nandy S (2023) Application of remote sensing-based spectral variability hypothesis to improve tree diversity estimation of seasonal tropical forest considering phenological variations. Geocarto Int 38(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2178525\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10106049.2023.2178525\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRen C, Jiang H, Xi Y, Liu P, Li H (2023) Quantifying temperate forest diversity by integrating GEDI LiDAR and multi-temporal sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens 15(2):375. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020375\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15020375\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZiliaskopoulos K, Laspidou C (2023) Using remote-sensing and citizen-science data to assess urban biodiversity for sustainable cityscapes. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2973172/v1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2973172/v1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRossi C, Hauser L, Gholizadeh H (2023) How to overcome different limitations in estimating plant diversity via spectral diversity? (No. EGU23-2872). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2872\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2872\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Copernicus Meetings\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTalas Mahammad Diganta M, Uddin G, M., Olbert AI (2023), May Assessing the atmospheric correction algorithms for improving the retrieval data accuracy in the remote sensing technique. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13477\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13477\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIchikawa D, Nagai M, Tamkuan N, Katiyar V, Eguchi T, Nagai Y (2022) Development and Utilization of a Mirror Array Target for the Calibration and Harmonization of Micro-Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens 14(22). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225717\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs14225717\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eV\u0026eacute;gh L, Tsuyuzaki S (2021) Remote sensing of forest diversities: the effect of image resolution and spectral plot extent. Int J Remote Sens 42(15). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.1934596\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01431161.2021.1934596\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTuominen S, N\u0026auml;si R, Honkavaara E, Balazs A, Hakala T, Viljanen N, P\u0026ouml;l\u0026ouml;nen I, Saari H, Ojanen H (2018) Assessment of classifiers and remote sensing features of hyperspectral imagery and stereo-photogrammetric point clouds for recognition of tree species in a forest area of high species diversity. Remote Sens 10(5). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050714\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs10050714\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eImmitzer M, Atzberger C (2023) Tree Species Diversity Mapping\u0026mdash;Success Stories and Possible Ways Forward. Remote Sens 15(12). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123074\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15123074\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRina S, Ying H, Shan Y, Du W, Liu Y, Li R, Deng D (2023) Application of machine learning to tree species classification using active and passive remote sensing: a case study of the Duraer forestry zone. Remote Sens 15(10). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102596\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15102596\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFan CL (2023) Ground surface structure classification using UAV remote sensing images and machine learning algorithms. Appl Geomatics 15(4):919\u0026ndash;931. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00530-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12518-023-00530-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHui Z, Cai Z, Xu P, Xia Y, Cheng P (2023) Tree Species Classification Using Optimized Features Derived from Light Detection and Ranging Point Clouds Based on Fractal Geometry and Quantitative Structure Model. Forests 14(6). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/f14061265\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/f14061265\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChrysafis I, Mallinis G, Korakis G, Dragozi E (2019), June Forest diversity estimation using Sentinel-2 and RapidEye imagery: A case study of the Northern Pindos National Park. In Seventh International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2019) (Vol. 11174, pp. 50\u0026ndash;58). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2533661\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1117/12.2533661\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang R, Gamon JA (2019) Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity. Elsevier: Remote Sens Environ. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111218\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.rse.2019.111218\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGound RS, Thepade SD (2022) Validation of ground truth of remotely sensed data from sentinel-2 (msi) using supervised classification, after combined cloud and shadow effect removal. Indian J Comput Sci Eng 13(3):860\u0026ndash;868. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.21817/indjcse/2022/v13i3/221303164\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.21817/indjcse/2022/v13i3/221303164\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVuorinne I, Heiskanen J, Ocholla I, Kihungu R, Pellikka P (2023) Assessment of airborne remote sensing data for high-resolution mapping of invasive Prosopis spp. in a semi-arid environment in Kenya (No. EGU23-12336). Copernicus Meetings. Vienna, Austria. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12336\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12336\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKatrandzhiev K, Gocheva K, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2022) Whole System Data Integration for Condition Assessments of Climate Change Impacts: An Example in High-Mountain Ecosystems in Rila (Bulgaria). Diversity 14(4):240. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/d14040240\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/d14040240\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMohammadpour P, Viegas C (2022) Adv Remote Sens For Monit 255\u0026ndash;287. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119788157.ch12\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/9781119788157.ch12\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Applications of Multi-Source and Multi‐Sensor Data Fusion of Remote Sensing for Forest Species Mapping\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang Y, Zhang L, Qi W, Huang C, Song R (2023) Contrastive self-supervised two-domain residual attention network with random augmentation pool for hyperspectral change detection. Remote Sens 15(15):3739. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153739\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs15153739\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTamburlin D, Torresani M, Tomelleri E, Tonon G, Rocchini D (2021) Testing the height variation hypothesis with the R Rasterdiv package for tree species diversity estimation. Remote Sens 13(18). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183569\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/rs13183569\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePacheco ADP, da Silva Junior JA, Ruiz-Armenteros AM, Henriques RFF, de Oliveira Santos I (2023) Analysis of spectral separability for detecting burned areas using landsat-8 OLI/TIRS images under different biomes in brazil and Portugal. Forests 14(4):663\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Table S1","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable S1 is not available with this version.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Forest plant diversity, Remote sensing, Systematic literature review, Biodiversity monitoring, conservation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis document presents a systematic literature review on the assessment of forest plant diversity using remote sensing techniques. Forest plant diversity plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem stability and providing essential services. However, human activities pose significant threats to biodiversity, necessitating effective monitoring and conservation efforts. Forest biodiversity monitoring provides evidence-based data for conservation programs and decision-making. Traditional methods of biodiversity assessment have limitations in terms of cost, time, and spatial coverage. Remote sensing data, on the other hand, offers a flexible and cost-effective approach to monitor forest species diversity, explore diversity-productivity relationships, and identify biodiversity hotspots. This review paper highlights various approaches to assess forest plant diversity, with a focus on remote sensing techniques. The benefits and drawbacks of remote sensing in biodiversity assessment are discussed, along with the use of Earth Observation satellite images, LiDAR data, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for mapping vegetation biodiversity. The document presents case studies showcasing the monitoring of forest diversity parameters across different ecosystems using remote sensing. It analyzes the temporal trend of publications, publishers, and authors in this field, along with the spatial analysis of study regions. Furthermore, the review discusses challenges and limitations of remote sensing in forest plant diversity monitoring and identifies research areas for improving its accuracy. Overall, this systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment of forest plant diversity based on remote sensing. It emphasizes the importance of remote sensing in conservation efforts, highlights the advancements in technology, and identifies future research directions to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of remote sensing approaches in biodiversity monitoring.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Forest Plant Diversity Assessment Based on Remote Sensing: A Systematic Literature Review","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-03-11 09:36:24","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6105040/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"344025b1-fc0e-4336-ba7e-73d5d9e9cb42","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":44846927,"name":"Forestry"},{"id":44846928,"name":"Conservation Biology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-11T09:36:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-03-11 09:36:24","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6105040","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6105040","identity":"rs-6105040","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}