Neural correlates of novel word-form learning in developmental language disorder

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This whole-brain fMRI study compared pseudoword repetition and repetition-based form learning in 46 children with developmental language disorder (ages 10–15) versus 71 age-matched children with typical language development. During scanning, participants heard and repeated pseudowords paired with visual referents, and the authors tracked learning-related changes in neural activity across repeated productions. Both groups showed comparable behavioural learning and similar learning-related decreases in activity, but the DLD group had lower pseudoword repetition accuracy and reduced leftward lateralisation of inferior frontal gyrus activity; group differences were concentrated in task-negative (deactivation) regions including lateral occipito-parietal cortex, medial parieto-occipital cortex, and right posterior cingulate cortex, indicating weaker default mode network suppression. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have persistent language learning difficulties and often perform poorly on pseudoword repetition, a task that probes phonological, memory, and speech-motor processes that support vocabulary acquisition. Research on the neural basis of pseudoword repetition in DLD is limited. We used whole-brain functional MRI (fMRI) to examine pseudoword repetition and repetition-based learning in 46 children with DLD (ages 10–15 years) and 71 age-matched children with typical language development. During scanning, children heard and repeated pseudowords paired with visual referents, allowing us to track learning-related changes in neural activity across repetitions. Repeated pseudoword production yielded comparable behavioural learning across groups, with faster productions by later repetitions. Post-scan, form–referent recognition was comparable across groups, whereas pseudoword repetition accuracy was lower in DLD. Pseudoword repetition engaged a distributed neural network, including inferior frontal cortex bilaterally (greater on the left), premotor and sensorimotor cortex, and posterior temporal and occipital regions. Group differences emerged primarily in regions where activity was task negative (i.e., below baseline or deactivated): lateral occipito-parietal cortex (posterior angular gyrus), medial parieto-occipital cortex (retrosplenial), and right posterior cingulate cortex. Learning-related decreases in activity were similar across groups, but region-of-interest analyses showed reduced leftward lateralisation of activity in inferior frontal gyrus in DLD. These findings suggest weaker disengagement of the default mode network during a linguistically demanding task in DLD. Although repetition-based pseudoword learning recruited similar neural mechanisms in both groups, these mechanisms may operate less efficiently in DLD, alongside reduced hemispheric specialisation in inferior frontal cortex. Highlights Similar repetition-related neural attenuation across groups during pseudoword learning. Reduced default-mode network suppression during pseudoword repetition in DLD. Reduced left-hemisphere specialisation of inferior frontal cortex in DLD. Repetition-based learning in DLD supported by less efficient neural networks.
Full text 2,419 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have persistent language learning difficulties and often perform poorly on pseudoword repetition, a task that probes phonological, memory, and speech-motor processes that support vocabulary acquisition. Research on the neural basis of pseudoword repetition in DLD is limited. We used whole-brain functional MRI (fMRI) to examine pseudoword repetition and repetition-based learning in 46 children with DLD (ages 10–15 years) and 71 age-matched children with typical language development. During scanning, children heard and repeated pseudowords paired with visual referents, allowing us to track learning-related changes in neural activity across repetitions. Repeated pseudoword production yielded comparable behavioural learning across groups, with faster productions by later repetitions. Post-scan, form–referent recognition was comparable across groups, whereas pseudoword repetition accuracy was lower in DLD. Pseudoword repetition engaged a distributed neural network, including inferior frontal cortex bilaterally (greater on the left), premotor and sensorimotor cortex, and posterior temporal and occipital regions. Group differences emerged primarily in regions where activity was task negative (i.e., below baseline or deactivated): lateral occipito-parietal cortex (posterior angular gyrus), medial parieto-occipital cortex (retrosplenial), and right posterior cingulate cortex. Learning-related decreases in activity were similar across groups, but region-of-interest analyses showed reduced leftward lateralisation of activity in inferior frontal gyrus in DLD. These findings suggest weaker disengagement of the default mode network during a linguistically demanding task in DLD. Although repetition-based pseudoword learning recruited similar neural mechanisms in both groups, these mechanisms may operate less efficiently in DLD, alongside reduced hemispheric specialisation in inferior frontal cortex. Highlights Similar repetition-related neural attenuation across groups during pseudoword learning. Reduced default-mode network suppression during pseudoword repetition in DLD. Reduced left-hemisphere specialisation of inferior frontal cortex in DLD. Repetition-based learning in DLD supported by less efficient neural networks. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* Joint senior authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00