Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules larger than 4 cm

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to diagnose the benign or malignant of large thyroid nodules by quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods 82 thyroid nodules were investigated retrospectively and divided them into benign (n = 62) and malignant groups (n = 20). DWI data were acquired, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to identify independent predictors, and develop a prediction model. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal threshold of risk factors, and constructed combined threshold models. Diagnostic performance metrics, including area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the ratio of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (UFNAB) of all models were calculated and compared with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) result. Results Two independent predictors of malignant nodules were identified by multivariate analysis: DWI signal intensity ratio (DWI SIR , P = 0.007) and minimum ADC (ADC min , P < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 0.198, the multivariate prediction model had an AUC of 0.946. The combined threshold model of DWI SIR and ADC min had the highest specificity up to 100% and the lowest UFNAB rate of 0%. Conclusion Quantitative DWI demonstrated favorable malignant thyroid nodule diagnostic efficacy. Combined thresholds of DWI SIR and ADC min greatly reduced the UFNAB.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00