The cost-effectiveness of 10 selected applications in minimally invasive therapy

Review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-23 ⓘ

This review evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ten minimally invasive procedures, including laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis, finding that evidence is disappointingly limited despite considerable potential.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In this article, evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the following procedures is reviewed: (1) laser treatment of bladder tumors; (2) extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy; (3) laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis; (4) laparoscopic removal of ovarian cysts; (5) laparoscopic cholecystectomy; (6) laparoscopic appendectomy; (7) catheter treatment of coronary artery disease; (8) palliation of colon cancer by endoscopic intervention; (9) treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding by endoscopic intervention; and (10) arthroscopic knee surgery. Despite considerable potential to be effective and cost-effective, evidence is disappointingly limited in these cases. The lack of evidence hampers decision-making in this new field.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Surgical Procedures, Operative Technology Assessment, Biomedical Therapeutics Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary Coronary Artery Bypass Coronary Artery Bypass Coronary Artery Bypass Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Endoscopy Endoscopy Endoscopy Europe Europe Health Policy Health Policy Health Policy

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:09:50.462052+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:58:50.057178+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:24:35.758740+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine