An Explainable Hybrid CNN–Transformer Framework with Aquila Optimization for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study introduces a hybrid CNN-Transformer model optimized with Aquila for brain tumor classification from MRI scans, achieving 97.2% accuracy with explainability features.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper studied an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for multi-class brain tumor classification from MRI, combining CNNs for local spatial feature extraction with Vision Transformers for long-range context, followed by attention-guided fusion. The authors trained and evaluated the model on a Kaggle dataset of 3,264 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial slices across four classes (glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and no tumor), using an Improved Aquila Optimizer for feature selection to improve generalization and reduce redundancy. Performance metrics reported include 97.2% accuracy, F1-score 0.96, and AUC-ROC 0.98, with interpretability provided via SHAP and Grad-CAM visualizations. The main caveat stated is that evaluation is performed on a specific public Kaggle dataset, which may limit generalizability beyond those data. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Accurate and interpretable brain tumor classification remains a critical challenge due to the heterogeneity of tumor types and the complexity of MRI data. This paper presents a hybrid deep learning framework that synergizes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) for multi-class brain tumor diagnosis. The model leverages CNNs for localized spatial feature extraction and ViTs for capturing long-range contextual information, followed by an attention-guided fusion mechanism. To enhance generalization and reduce feature redundancy, an Improved Aquila Optimizer (AQO) is employed for metaheuristic feature selection. The model is trained and evaluated on the Kaggle brain MRI dataset, comprising 3,264 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial slices categorized into four classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and no tumor. To ensure interpretability, SHAP and Grad-CAM are integrated to visualize both semantic and spatial relevance in predictions. The proposed method achieves a classification accuracy of 97.2%, F1-score of 0.96, and AUC-ROC of 0.98, outperforming baseline CNN and ViT models.
Full text 2,643 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Accurate and interpretable brain tumor classification remains a critical challenge due to the heterogeneity of tumor types and the complexity of MRI data. This paper presents a hybrid deep learning framework that synergizes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) for multi-class brain tumor diagnosis. The model leverages CNNs for localized spatial feature extraction and ViTs for capturing long-range contextual information, followed by an attention-guided fusion mechanism. To enhance generalization and reduce feature redundancy, an Improved Aquila Optimizer (AQO) is employed for metaheuristic feature selection. The model is trained and evaluated on the Kaggle brain MRI dataset, comprising 3,264 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial slices categorized into four classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and no tumor. To ensure interpretability, SHAP and Grad-CAM are integrated to visualize both semantic and spatial relevance in predictions. The proposed method achieves a classification accuracy of 97.2%, F1-score of 0.96, and AUC-ROC of 0.98, outperforming baseline CNN and ViT models. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement No funding Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: N/A I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Statement Data is available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pardhut/mri-based-braintumor-pardhu

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00