Comparative Analysis of Syntax and BCIS Jeopardy Score of Diabetics Versus Non‐Diabetic Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Diabetic patients tend to have complex coronary artery disease (CAD). Understanding their procedural risk may help guiding treatment strategies. Syntax and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) Jeopardy Score (BCIS-JS) have been used to define complex CAD but not compared in diabetic patients. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were deemed unsuitable for surgical revascularization. Both syntax and BCIS-JS were calculated by experienced operators who were blinded to patient’s outcome. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 12 months. Results: Of 452 patients included in the study, diabetes was present in 35% patients. There was a modest relationship between BCIS-JS and syntax score (Spearman r= 0.44, P< 0.001) and this relationship was even weaker in patients with diabetes (Spearman r= 0.32, P< 0.001). The primary endpoint was comparable in the non-diabetic group irrespective of the used score (syntax or BCIS-JS) to define complex CAD. In contrast, there was a differential prognostic outcome in the diabetic group, whereby the primary endpoint was more frequently reported in diabetic patients with high versus low syntax score [HR 4.96, 95% CI (1.44- 17.03), P= 0.011] but not when BCIS-JS was used. Conclusions: There was a modest relationship between BCIS-JS and syntax score. Unlike, BCIS-JS, syntax score identified patients who are at increased risk of death in diabetic patients. Both scoring system did not effectively differentiate mortality risk in non-diabetic patients. Future research is needed to confirm this study’s findings.