Pervasive Negative Effects of Leucaena leucocephala (White-Popinac) Invasion on Regenerating Areas of the Atlantic Forest

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper examines whether using the invasive tree Leucaena leucocephala in ecological restoration affects natural regeneration in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest, focusing on 29 regenerating areas where white-popinac invasion had progressed for different durations. Through floristic surveys of arboreal and herbaceous layers, the authors quantified community-weighted mean seed mass, tree/shrub richness and abundance, and measures of α/β functional diversity, including animal-dispersed species. They found that longer invasion was associated with decreased native seed mass and increased seed mass for invasive species, increased tree abundance without higher tree species richness, and reduced richness of animal-dispersed species, indicating compromised regeneration trajectories. The authors caution that the preprint has not been peer reviewed, and the study is limited to naturally regenerating areas within the Atlantic Forest and to functional/trait metrics rather than direct causal mechanisms. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The use of invasive species in ecological restoration is controversial and has raised recent concerns. In Brazil, some ecosystem restoration and agroforestry projects have proposed that white-popinac (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit), a broadly distributed invasive species, is a promisor species to be used when the soil is severely altered, based on the premise that it might not necessarily disrupt natural regeneration processes, especially in fragmented forests. To address this uncertainty, we investigated its effects on the functional diversity of naturally regenerating forests dominated by invasive grasses within the Atlantic Forest domain. We conducted floristic surveys on the arboreal and herbaceous strata in 29 regenerating areas invaded by white-popinac, each with a unique time-since-invasion, thereby creating a gradient of invasion duration. We estimated the average seed mass of each regenerating area (CWM), as well as species richness and abundance of trees/shrubs and animal dispersed species, and α and β functional metrics. The progression of invasion led to (i) a major decrease in the average seed mass of native species, contrasted by an increase of this metric for invasive species; (ii) an increase in tree abundance, without increasing tree species richness; and (iii) a reduction in the richness of animal-dispersed species. Collectively, these results indicate that the natural regeneration trajectories of Atlantic Forest fragments can be strongly compromised by the advance of white-popinac invasions. Our results highlight the need for early control measures and caution against using white-popinac in restoration, emphasizing the value of functional metrics in monitoring.Therefore, management protocols for the prevention and control of white-popinac must be implemented, and its use in restoration projects should not be advised.
Full text 2,683 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. The use of invasive species in ecological restoration is controversial and has raised recent concerns. In Brazil, some ecosystem restoration and agroforestry projects have proposed that white-popinac (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit), a broadly distributed invasive species, is a promisor species to be used when the soil is severely altered, based on the premise that it might not necessarily disrupt natural regeneration processes, especially in fragmented forests. To address this uncertainty, we investigated its effects on the functional diversity of naturally regenerating forests dominated by invasive grasses within the Atlantic Forest domain. We conducted floristic surveys on the arboreal and herbaceous strata in 29 regenerating areas invaded by white-popinac, each with a unique time-since-invasion, thereby creating a gradient of invasion duration. We estimated the average seed mass of each regenerating area (CWM), as well as species richness and abundance of trees/shrubs and animal dispersed species, and α and β functional metrics. The progression of invasion led to (i) a major decrease in the average seed mass of native species, contrasted by an increase of this metric for invasive species; (ii) an increase in tree abundance, without increasing tree species richness; and (iii) a reduction in the richness of animal-dispersed species. Collectively, these results indicate that the natural regeneration trajectories of Atlantic Forest fragments can be strongly compromised by the advance of white-popinac invasions. Our results highlight the need for early control measures and caution against using white-popinac in restoration, emphasizing the value of functional metrics in monitoring.Therefore, management protocols for the prevention and control of white-popinac must be implemented, and its use in restoration projects should not be advised. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SH19 Ecology and Evolutionary Biology leucena, invasional meltdown, metacommunity ecology, functional traits, restoration Published: 2025-05-13 18:11 Last Updated: 2025-05-13 18:11 CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: 10.5281/zenodo.15392794 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00