Psychosexual Adaptation and Quality of Life After Hysterectomy

In: Sexuality and Disability · 2009 · vol. 28(1) , pp. 3–13 · doi:10.1007/s11195-009-9143-y · W2055997551
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-09

This paper discusses the impact of hysterectomy on women's psychosexual adaptation and quality of life, noting concerns about sexual dysfunction and varying study findings.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This paper discusses psychosexual adaptation and quality of life after hysterectomy, focusing on how hysterectomy performed for abnormal bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and symptomatic myomas may improve general health-related quality of life while also raising concerns about unnecessary procedures and subsequent sexual/psychosexual problems. It reviews reported post-hysterectomy sexual dysfunctions such as dyspareunia (including effects like vaginal shrinkage and decreased lubrication), low libido, and difficulty experiencing orgasm, noting that prevalence varies across studies due to methodological differences and that there is no consensus on whether hysterectomy causes sexual dysfunction. The main caveat highlighted is the lack of agreement across the literature and the influence of methodological factors on measured outcomes. Relevance to endometriosis: hysterectomy is discussed in the context of chronic pelvic pain as an indication and as a potential outcome of pelvic surgery, though the paper does not specifically address endometriosis or adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (39)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK