Pushing the Boundaries of Robotic Computed Tomography: Automated Twin-Robot CT Scan with Maximum Reachability

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This preprint studies collision-free robot reachability and trajectory planning for twin-robot computed tomography when scanning large objects, using a CAD-based, geometry-driven methodology for region-of-interest (ROI) scans. The authors determine robot reachability from the test object’s geometry and then plan trajectories over accessible collision-free regions, expanding pose space by incorporating translational and rotational degrees of freedom, including variable source-detector distances and detector rotations. They demonstrate the approach via batch simulation of 273 ROI positions on a BMW 4-series body-in-white, using a data completeness trajectory optimization criterion to evaluate how reachability improves. The main stated caveat is that the work is a preprint and not yet peer reviewed, and the results are demonstrated through simulation rather than reported experimental validation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Computed tomography is a widely used imaging method for non-destructive testing. However, standard CT systems face fundamental limitations when scanning large objects such as car bodies, which must fit between the X-ray source and detector, both of which need freedom of movement around the specimen. Twin-robotic CT systems with high degrees of freedom address these limitations by enabling free positioning of the X-ray source and detector in space, making non-destructive CT testing of large objects feasible. However, achieving collision-free positioning of the robots is a challenging problem that is often neglected in theoretical representations of twin-robot CT configurations. This paper presents a systematic methodology for performing region-of-interest scans on large objects. The approach exploits the test object's geometry to determine robot reachability, which serves as the foundation for trajectory planning by incorporating accessible regions. By leveraging both rotational and translational degrees of freedom, including variable source-detector distances and detector rotations, the methodology expands the range of collision-free poses, thereby increasing reachability and enabling more flexible trajectory design. The methodology is modular and adapts to arbitrary system configurations and test samples via cad-based geometry definition, where the test object determines the collision-free workspace. It is demonstrated on a BMW 4-series body-in-white through comprehensive batch simulation across 273 roi positions, evaluating reachability improvements achieved through the introduced degrees of freedom using a data completeness trajectory optimization criterion.
Full text 13,983 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Pushing the Boundaries of Robotic Computed Tomography: Automated Twin-Robot CT Scan with Maximum Reachability | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Pushing the Boundaries of Robotic Computed Tomography: Automated Twin-Robot CT Scan with Maximum Reachability Jonas Schnitzer, Vinayaka Raju Sathyanarayana Raju, Nihat Emir Erdebil, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Computed tomography is a widely used imaging method for non-destructive testing. However, standard CT systems face fundamental limitations when scanning large objects such as car bodies, which must fit between the X-ray source and detector, both of which need freedom of movement around the specimen. Twin-robotic CT systems with high degrees of freedom address these limitations by enabling free positioning of the X-ray source and detector in space, making non-destructive CT testing of large objects feasible. However, achieving collision-free positioning of the robots is a challenging problem that is often neglected in theoretical representations of twin-robot CT configurations. This paper presents a systematic methodology for performing region-of-interest scans on large objects. The approach exploits the test object's geometry to determine robot reachability, which serves as the foundation for trajectory planning by incorporating accessible regions. By leveraging both rotational and translational degrees of freedom, including variable source-detector distances and detector rotations, the methodology expands the range of collision-free poses, thereby increasing reachability and enabling more flexible trajectory design. The methodology is modular and adapts to arbitrary system configurations and test samples via cad-based geometry definition, where the test object determines the collision-free workspace. It is demonstrated on a BMW 4-series body-in-white through comprehensive batch simulation across 273 roi positions, evaluating reachability improvements achieved through the introduced degrees of freedom using a data completeness trajectory optimization criterion. Physical sciences/Engineering Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing Physical sciences/Physics Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 11 May, 2026 Reviews received at journal 08 May, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 19 Apr, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Apr, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 17 Apr, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 08 Apr, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 08 Apr, 2026 Editor invited by journal 07 Apr, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 04 Apr, 2026 First submitted to journal 04 Apr, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9280493","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":619536222,"identity":"c964470e-c1eb-4e30-b1ba-be4e2c7c6255","order_by":0,"name":"Jonas Schnitzer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Erlangen-Nuremberg","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jonas","middleName":"","lastName":"Schnitzer","suffix":""},{"id":619536226,"identity":"e4afc6c2-8440-44c7-9d76-f9d6a27ca12e","order_by":1,"name":"Vinayaka Raju Sathyanarayana Raju","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"TU Dortmund University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vinayaka","middleName":"Raju Sathyanarayana","lastName":"Raju","suffix":""},{"id":619536228,"identity":"88a2c885-2aaa-4c11-9fac-24f39e0ed6f5","order_by":2,"name":"Nihat Emir Erdebil","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Technical University of Munich","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nihat","middleName":"Emir","lastName":"Erdebil","suffix":""},{"id":619536229,"identity":"1179f00d-8ba1-427a-a4c4-6b8208754837","order_by":3,"name":"Gabriel Herl","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Deggendorf Institute of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gabriel","middleName":"","lastName":"Herl","suffix":""},{"id":619536230,"identity":"0a603ede-d4c8-40fc-ac86-edfab144f4e5","order_by":4,"name":"Andreas Maier","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Erlangen-Nuremberg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Andreas","middleName":"","lastName":"Maier","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-31 13:25:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106941648,"identity":"8fea20e5-fcf1-4e1e-8fcb-f94222e82b18","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-15 05:34:58","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2111382,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AScanwithMaximalReachability02.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9280493/v1_covered_f40c0476-be51-4009-85d2-2e232ce29f04.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Pushing the Boundaries of Robotic Computed Tomography: Automated Twin-Robot CT Scan with Maximum Reachability","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Computed tomography is a widely used imaging method for non-destructive testing. However, standard CT systems face fundamental limitations when scanning large objects such as car bodies, which must fit between the X-ray source and detector, both of which need freedom of movement around the specimen.\nTwin-robotic CT systems with high degrees of freedom address these limitations by enabling free positioning of the X-ray source and detector in space, making non-destructive CT testing of large objects feasible. However, achieving collision-free positioning of the robots is a challenging problem that is often neglected in theoretical representations of twin-robot CT configurations.\nThis paper presents a systematic methodology for performing region-of-interest scans on large objects. The approach exploits the test object's geometry to determine robot reachability, which serves as the foundation for trajectory planning by incorporating accessible regions. By leveraging both rotational and translational degrees of freedom, including variable source-detector distances and detector rotations, the methodology expands the range of collision-free poses, thereby increasing reachability and enabling more flexible trajectory design.\nThe methodology is modular and adapts to arbitrary system configurations and test samples via cad-based geometry definition, where the test object determines the collision-free workspace. It is demonstrated on a BMW 4-series body-in-white through comprehensive batch simulation across 273 roi positions, evaluating reachability improvements achieved through the introduced degrees of freedom using a data completeness trajectory optimization criterion.","manuscriptTitle":"Pushing the Boundaries of Robotic Computed Tomography: Automated Twin-Robot CT Scan with Maximum Reachability","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-15 05:34:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9280493/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-05-11T07:44:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-05-08T15:44:54+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"56807945917763730258070686399444447136","date":"2026-04-19T20:11:13+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-19T12:37:42+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"171531100225815872879656649909962177903","date":"2026-04-19T11:52:54+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"281174181234113061297789421342824342200","date":"2026-04-17T13:31:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-08T08:34:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-04-08T08:32:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-07T12:29:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-04-04T17:18:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2026-04-04T17:15:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c2e9dd76-1b52-4a3a-9050-cd443f1898d8","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 15th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-05-11T07:44:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-05-08T15:44:54+00:00","index":45,"fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"in-revision","subjectAreas":[{"id":65925227,"name":"Physical sciences/Engineering"},{"id":65925228,"name":"Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing"},{"id":65925229,"name":"Physical sciences/Physics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-11T07:58:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-15 05:34:38","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9280493","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9280493","identity":"rs-9280493","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00