A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE PELVIC MASS IN WOMENS IN TERMS OF PARITY AND AGE

Dr Taimoor Hafeez, Dr Iqra Idrees,
2021 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4437935 · W6893724466
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-07 · read from full text ⓘ

This descriptive study analyzed 110 patients with pelvic masses at Shaikh Zayed Hospital in Lahore between January and December 2020 to evaluate correlations with parity, age, and clinical presentation. The majority of participants were parous women aged thirty to fifty years, with lower abdominal pain and menstrual disturbances being the most frequent symptoms reported. Diagnosis was primarily confirmed via ultrasound and histopathology, revealing that genital tract tumors accounted for over sixty percent of cases, while non-gynecological masses represented a small minority. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to Analyze the pelvic mass patients in terms of parity, age, clinical presentation. material And Methods: The design of this study was a descriptive study. This study was carried out at shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore and the duration of this study was from January 2020 to December 2020. We included all the patients of pelvic mass without any discrimination of parity and age, the disease was diagnosed through clinical assessment, history diagnosis and also through USG. Confirmation of pelvic mass type was made through histopathology and surgery. Results: We included in our research 110 patients diagnosed with pelvic mass; among these patients 61 were (55.45%) in the age group of 30 – 50 years and one patient were observed as under twenty and two were above seventy years of age. Maximum of the women were in the category of parous. Through clinical presentations we observed that 42 patients faced lower pain of the abdomen (38.18%) and 38 menstrual disturbances patients were also reported (34.54%). First clinical assessment was observed in 84 patients (76.36%) further confirmation was made through USG. In all the patients we included 104 patients (94.54%) with the help of USG. Gentile tract tumor was observed in 68 patients (61.82%); whereas, four patients were diagnosed with non-gynecological mass. Size of mass was observed (above 20 cm) in 10 patients (9.1%); however, fewer common observations were made about the malignant lesions below ten centimeters in size. Conclusion: Every patient of pelvic mass without any discrimination of parity and age was treated and investigated in detail. Diagnosis of the non-gynecological masses was also made; therefore, competent surgeons were assigned the task to treat the patients of pelvic masses. Keywords: Pelvic Mass, Diagnosed, Palpable, Genital Organs, Tumor, Sonography.
Full text 2,133 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Objective

The aim of this study was to Analyze the pelvic mass patients in terms of parity, age, clinical presentation.

Material and methods

The design of this study was a descriptive study. This study was carried out at shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore and the duration of this study was from January 2020 to December 2020. We included all the patients of pelvic mass without any discrimination of parity and age, the disease was diagnosed through clinical assessment, history diagnosis and also through USG. Confirmation of pelvic mass type was made through histopathology and surgery.

Results

We included in our research 110 patients diagnosed with pelvic mass; among these patients 61 were (55.45%) in the age group of 30 – 50 years and one patient were observed as under twenty and two were above seventy years of age. Maximum of the women were in the category of parous. Through clinical presentations we observed that 42 patients faced lower pain of the abdomen (38.18%) and 38 menstrual disturbances patients were also reported (34.54%). First clinical assessment was observed in 84 patients (76.36%) further confirmation was made through USG. In all the patients we included 104 patients (94.54%) with the help of USG. Gentile tract tumor was observed in 68 patients (61.82%); whereas, four patients were diagnosed with non-gynecological mass. Size of mass was observed (above 20 cm) in 10 patients (9.1%); however, fewer common observations were made about the malignant lesions below ten centimeters in size.

Conclusion

Every patient of pelvic mass without any discrimination of parity and age was treated and investigated in detail. Diagnosis of the non-gynecological masses was also made; therefore, competent surgeons were assigned the task to treat the patients of pelvic masses.

Keywords

Pelvic Mass, Diagnosed, Palpable, Genital Organs, Tumor, Sonography. Files 265.HARIS 4.pdf Files (687.0 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:5280a2711a9979dbca61fccc6fcf1228 | 687.0 kB | Preview Download |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:21:08.581941+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK