⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06
· read from full text
ⓘ
The study develops and evaluates multimodal Graph Neural Network models (GCN, GAT, and Graph U-Net) for automatic cortical surface segmentation from MRI, using silver-standard region labels generated by FreeSurfer. Training incorporates both structural connectivity features inferred from diffusion MRI and anatomical features from structural MRI, and the key finding is that GNNs—especially the GAT architecture—achieve Dice scores competitive with non-graph methods while combined dMRI+sMRI improves segmentation versus sMRI alone. As a caveat, the paper compares the GNN-based segmentations with FreeSurfer mainly in terms of demographic/clinical prediction and reports no statistically significant superiority of either approach. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Due to the significant amount of time and expertise needed for manual segmentation of the brain cortex from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, there is a substantial need for efficient and accurate algorithms to replace the need for human involvement. In this work, we explore the capabilities of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to segment the brain surface based on structural brain connectivity. We train three different GNN architectures, the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), the Graph Attention Network (GAT), and the Graph U-Net, and evaluate their performances when trained on silver-standard cortical region labels created by FreeSurfer. We take a multimodal approach to brain segmentation by examining the influence of the structural connectivity values inferred from diffusion MRI (dMRI) in addition to using values from structural MRI (sMRI). Our results demonstrate the utility of GNN models, particularly the GAT architecture, which achieved Dice scores competitive to those reported in the literature with non-graph methods. Additionally, structural connectivity derived from dMRI revealed significant value in improving automatic segmentation, as models trained on combined attributes from dMRI and sMRI outperformed those trained only on sMRI. Finally, we compared the GNN-based and the FreeSurfer segmentations in their ability to predict demographic/clinical data, where neither of the two approaches was statistically significantly superior to the other.
Full text
1,713 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
Due to the significant amount of time and expertise needed for manual segmentation of the brain cortex from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, there is a substantial need for efficient and accurate algorithms to replace the need for human involvement. In this work, we explore the capabilities of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to segment the brain surface based on structural brain connectivity. We train three different GNN architectures, the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), the Graph Attention Network (GAT), and the Graph U-Net, and evaluate their performances when trained on silver-standard cortical region labels created by FreeSurfer. We take a multimodal approach to brain segmentation by examining the influence of the structural connectivity values inferred from diffusion MRI (dMRI) in addition to using values from structural MRI (sMRI). Our results demonstrate the utility of GNN models, particularly the GAT architecture, which achieved Dice scores competitive to those reported in the literature with non-graph methods. Additionally, structural connectivity derived from dMRI revealed significant value in improving automatic segmentation, as models trained on combined attributes from dMRI and sMRI outperformed those trained only on sMRI. Finally, we compared the GNN-based and the FreeSurfer segmentations in their ability to predict demographic/clinical data, where neither of the two approaches was statistically significantly superior to the other.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
↵# AFP is now with Better Care S.L. and Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain.
The methods, experiments, and results are further clarified.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.