Dividing out quantification uncertainty enables assessment of differential transcript usage with limma and edgeR

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The paper studies differential transcript usage (DTU) in RNA-seq, focusing on how transcript quantification uncertainty—especially read-to-transcript ambiguity (RTA)—affects statistical power and error rates in DTU analyses when total gene expression is unchanged. The authors develop limma and edgeR DTU pipelines (diffSplice) that incorporate RTA dispersion by using “divided counts” to remove RTA-induced dispersion from isoform counts and to handle sparsity in transcript-level data, providing a unified interface for small and large datasets. In simulations and analyses of real mouse mammary epithelial cell RNA-seq data, the proposed pipelines show greater power, improved efficiency, and better FDR control than existing DTU methods, with the major caveat being reliance on RNA-seq quantification assumptions and performance shown in their tested simulation/real datasets rather than across all possible experimental designs. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Differential transcript usage (DTU) refers to changes in the relative abundance of transcript isoforms of the same gene between experimental conditions, even when the total expression of the gene doesn’t change. DTU analysis requires the quantification of individual isoforms from RNA-seq data, which has a high level of uncertainty due to transcript overlap and read-to-transcript ambiguity (RTA). Popular DTU analysis methods do not directly account for the RTA overdispersion within their statistical frameworks, leading to reduced statistical power or poor error rate control, particularly in scenarios with small sample sizes. This article presents limma and edgeR analysis pipelines that account for RTA during DTU assessment. Leveraging recent advancements in the limma and edgeR Bioconductor packages, we propose DTU analysis pipelines optimized for small and large datasets with a unified interface via the diffSplice function. The pipelines make use of divided counts to remove RTA-induced dispersion from transcript isoform counts and account for the sparsity in transcript-level counts. Simulations and analysis of real data from mouse mammary epithelial cells demonstrate that the diffSplice pipelines provide greater power, improved efficiency, and improved FDR control compared to existing specialized DTU methods.
Full text 1,534 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Differential transcript usage (DTU) refers to changes in the relative abundance of transcript isoforms of the same gene between experimental conditions, even when the total expression of the gene doesn’t change. DTU analysis requires the quantification of individual isoforms from RNA-seq data, which has a high level of uncertainty due to transcript overlap and read-to-transcript ambiguity (RTA). Popular DTU analysis methods do not directly account for the RTA overdispersion within their statistical frameworks, leading to reduced statistical power or poor error rate control, particularly in scenarios with small sample sizes. This article presents limma and edgeR analysis pipelines that account for RTA during DTU assessment. Leveraging recent advancements in the limma and edgeR Bioconductor packages, we propose DTU analysis pipelines optimized for small and large datasets with a unified interface via the diffSplice function. The pipelines make use of divided counts to remove RTA-induced dispersion from transcript isoform counts and account for the sparsity in transcript-level counts. Simulations and analysis of real data from mouse mammary epithelial cells demonstrate that the diffSplice pipelines provide greater power, improved efficiency, and improved FDR control compared to existing specialized DTU methods. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This version includes a more thorough discussion on how to compute TPMs with edgeR and limma fitted values.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00