The Swiss Endometriosis Database: a retrospective multicentre cohort study on pain levels and multimodal treatment needs of endometriosis patients.

article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This retrospective multicentre study of 3403 Swiss endometriosis patients found high pain scores, frequent multiple endometriosis phenotypes, and diverse multimodal treatment recommendations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

I can’t access the actual study content because the provided “paper body” contains a website anti-bot/Proof-of-Work challenge rather than the paper text, so I’m unable to summarize the methods, population, findings, or stated limitations. The only information available is the title, which indicates a retrospective multicentre cohort study in Switzerland focusing on pain levels and multimodal treatment needs among endometriosis patients, but the specific results and caveats are not present in what I received. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — the paper’s stated aim is to characterize pain and multimodal treatment needs in an endometriosis patient cohort.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Study Aims This study aimed to deepen the understanding of endometriosis symptoms, types, and therapy recommendations for Swiss endometriosis patients in Swiss-certified endometriosis centres in 2022.Methods In this exploratory retrospective multicentre cohort study, data from 3538 women who had their first consultation at a certified endometriosis centre in Switzerland in 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Data were collected by using questionnaires that were filled out by the patient and the physician at the first consultation, to evaluate parameters that included the main reason for consultation, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain, clinical findings and therapy recommendations.Results This study analysed all patients who had provided consent and were diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 3403, 96.2%) during their first consultation at a Swiss-certified endometriosis centre in 2022. The median age was 33.0 years (11-66 years). Of 812 documented VAS scores, 71.6% of the patients felt general pain, resulting in a median VAS score for dysmenorrhoea of 8 (0-10). After the first examination, peritoneal endometriosis (n = 1453, 54.8%) was diagnosed most often, followed by adenomyosis (n = 1366, 51.5%), deep infiltrating endometriosis (n = 857, 32.3%) and cystic/ovarian endometriosis (n = 643, 24.2%). In 46.2% of the patients, more than one working hypothesis, with regard to their condition, was identified - in most cases, a combination of peritoneal endometriosis and adenomyosis (15.6%). Endocrine therapy was the most frequent treatment recommended (60.6%), followed by recommendations for medical pain therapy (57%), surgery (34.4%), complementary procedures (23.5%), reproductive therapy (5.7%) and multimodal pain therapy (5.6%). Analysis of correlations between symptoms, diagnosis and treatment recommendations showed only a few notable findings such as correlations between peritoneal endometriosis and hormonal-/medical treatment as well as correlations between deep infiltrating endometriosis and treatment recommendation for surgery.Conclusion The high VAS scores in dysmenorrhoea underline the degree of suffering of patients with endometriosis seeking consultation at a certified endometriosis centre. Most patients presented multiple phenotypes with uncorrelated symptoms and diverse as well as multimodal treatment options were indicated, underlining the complexity and individuality of the disease.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosisdie_deep_infiltratingdysmenorrhea

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T11:10:35.749868+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK