Prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheters for major gynaecological surgery

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-30

This study reviewed 337 major gynecological surgery patients and found prophylactic bilateral ureteric catheterization to be quick, easy, and associated with low complication rates and potential benefits.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This retrospective case-note review studied 337 patients undergoing laparotomy for major gynecological surgery at a single unit, where systematic prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheterisation is performed, assessing ureteric catheter-associated morbidity. Bilateral catheters were attempted in most patients and successfully placed in 315/337 (93%), taking about 5.4 minutes for experienced consultants versus 8.4 minutes for trainees, with no intra-operative ureteric complications reported. Post-operatively, complications were urinary tract infection (1.48%, 5/337), acute renal failure (0.6%, 2/337), and uretero-vaginal fistulae (0.3%, 1/337). A key limitation explicitly reflected by the design is that it is a single-centre retrospective review without a comparative control group. The paper is not centrally about endometriosis or adenomyosis; it includes “severe endometriosis” as one of the surgical indications (6 patients) and therefore has limited direct relevance to these conditions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheters for major gynaecological surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of ureteric catheter-associated morbidity in our Unit, where systematic pre-operative ureteric catheterisation is performed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective casenote review of 337 gynaecology patients undergoing laparotomy at Salford Royal Hospital between January 2007 and September 2010. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.36 (range 17-89). Procedures included TAH BSO (n = 249, 74 %), BSO (n = 17, 5 %), radical hysterectomy (n = 36, 11 %), and other (n = 35, 10 %), for indications of ovarian (n = 189, 56 %), uterine (n = 88, 26 %) or cervical cancer (n = 18, 5.3 %), massive fibroids (n = 27, 8 %), severe endometriosis (n = 6, 1.78 %), or other (n = 9, 2.67 %). Bilateral ureteric catheters were attempted in most patients and successfully placed in 315/337 (93 %) patients. In 22 patients (7 %), either no ureteric catheters or a single ureteric catheter was placed due to pre-existing ureteric anomaly, technical difficulty, or surgeon choice. Bilateral ureteric catheterisation took an average of 5.4 min (SD 2.0, range 3.2-9.2) for an experienced consultant or 8.4 min (SD 3.9, range 6.4-18.6) for an SpR trainee to complete. There were no intra-operative ureteric complications. Post-operative complications included urinary tract infection (5/337 patients, 1.48 %), acute renal failure (2/337, 0.6 %), and uretero-vaginal fistulae (1/337 patients, 0.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic pre-operative ureteric catheters are quick and easy to insert and associated with low complication rates. Routine use before major gynaecological surgery can expedite intra-operative identification of the ureters and may reduce accidental ureteric injury.
Full text 7,451 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose The use of prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheters for major gynaecological surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of ureteric catheter-associated morbidity in our Unit, where systematic pre-operative ureteric catheterisation is performed.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective casenote review of 337 gynaecology patients undergoing laparotomy at Salford Royal Hospital between January 2007 and September 2010.

Results

The mean age was 56.36 (range 17–89). Procedures included TAH BSO (n = 249, 74 %), BSO (n = 17, 5 %), radical hysterectomy (n = 36, 11 %), and other (n = 35, 10 %), for indications of ovarian (n = 189, 56 %), uterine (n = 88, 26 %) or cervical cancer (n = 18, 5.3 %), massive fibroids (n = 27, 8 %), severe endometriosis (n = 6, 1.78 %), or other (n = 9, 2.67 %). Bilateral ureteric catheters were attempted in most patients and successfully placed in 315/337 (93 %) patients. In 22 patients (7 %), either no ureteric catheters or a single ureteric catheter was placed due to pre-existing ureteric anomaly, technical difficulty, or surgeon choice. Bilateral ureteric catheterisation took an average of 5.4 min (SD 2.0, range 3.2–9.2) for an experienced consultant or 8.4 min (SD 3.9, range 6.4–18.6) for an SpR trainee to complete. There were no intra-operative ureteric complications. Post-operative complications included urinary tract infection (5/337 patients, 1.48 %), acute renal failure (2/337, 0.6 %), and uretero-vaginal fistulae (1/337 patients, 0.3 %).

Conclusions

Prophylactic pre-operative ureteric catheters are quick and easy to insert and associated with low complication rates. Routine use before major gynaecological surgery can expedite intra-operative identification of the ureters and may reduce accidental ureteric injury. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Dowling R, Corriere J, Sandler C (1986) Iatrogenic ureteral injury. J Urol 135:912–915 Mann W, Arato M, Patsner B et al (1988) Ureteral injuries in an obstetrics and gynecology training program: etiology and management. Obstet Gynecol 72:82–85 Vilos G, Dow D, Allen H (1999) Litigation following ureteral injuries associated with gynecological surgery. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 21:31–45 Gilmour D, Dwyer P, Carey M (1999) Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynaecol 95(5):883–889 Jha S, Coomarasamy A, Chan K (2004) Ureteric injury in obstetric and gynaecological surgery. Obstet Gynaecol 6:203–208 Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Tititinen A (1998) Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 92:113–118 Mendez L (2001) Iatrogenic injuries in gynecologic cancer surgery. Surg Clin North Am 81:897–923 Watterson J, Mahoney J, Futter N, Garfield J (1998) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: approaches to etiology and management. Can J Surg 41:379–382 Liu C, Riich H (1994) Complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 518 cases. Gynaecol Endos 3:203–208 Aaslan P, Brooks A, Drummond M, Woo H (1999) Incidence and management of gynaecological-related ureteric injuries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 39:178–181 Ridley J (1981) Gynecologic surgery: errors, safeguards, salvage. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p p110 Berkmen F, Peker AE, Alagol H, Ayyildiz A, Arik AI, Basay S (2000) Treatment of iatrogenic ureteral injuries during various operations for malignant condition. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 19:441–445 Schimpf M, Gottenger E, Wagner J (2008) Universal ureteral stent placement at hysterectomy to identify ureteral injury: a decision analysis. BJOG 115:1151–1158 Neuman M, Eidelman A, Langer R et al (1991) Iatrogenic injuries to the ureter during gynecological and obstetric operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173:268–272 Gilberti C, Germinale F, Lillo M et al (1996) Obstetric and gynaecological ureteric injuries: treatment and results. Br J Urol 77:21–26 Symmonds R (1976) Ureteral injuries associated with gynecologic surgery: prevention and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 19:623–644 Abu-Rustum N, Sonoda Y, Black D, Chi D, Barakat R (2006) Cystoscopic temporary ureteral catheterization during radical vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 103:729–731 Tanaka Y, Asada H, Kuji N, Yoshimura Y (2008) Ureteral catheter placement for prevention of ureteral injury during laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Res 34(1):67–72 Kuno K, Menzin A, Kauder H, Sison C, Gal D (1998) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery. Urology 52(6):1004–1008 Leff E, Graff W, Rubin R et al (1982) Use of ureteral catheters in colonic and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 25:457–460 Bothwell W, Bleicher R, Dent T (1994) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 37:330–334 Chou M, Wang C, Lien R (2009) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynaecologic surgery: a 12-year randomized trial in a community hospital. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:689–693 Wu M, Lin Y, Chou C (2001) Major complications of operative gynaecologic laparoscopy in southern Taiwan. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:61–67 Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen S, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy:comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339–345 Shen C, Wu M, Kung F, Huang F, Hsieh C, Lan K (2003) Major complications associated with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy:ten year experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:147–153 Kreiker G, Bertoldi A, Larcher J, Orrico G, Chapron C (2004) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:229–235 Shingleton H (1984) Repairing injuries to the urinary tract: update on general surgery. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 23:76–90 Buchsbaum J, Schmidt J (1978) Gynecologic and obstetric urology. In: Buschsbaum H, Schmidt J (eds) The urinary tract in clinical and surgical gynaecology and obstetrics. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 91–95 Falk H (1949) Urologic injuries in gynecology. FA Davis, Philadelphia, pp 263–264 Sheikh F, Khubchandani I (1990) Prophylactic ureteral catheters in colon surgery- how safe are they? Dis Colon Rectum 33:508–510 Visco A, Taber K, Weidner A, Barber M, Myers E (2001) Cost-effectiveness of universal cystoscopy to identify ureteral injury at hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecolet 97:685–692 Nam YS et al (2002) Clinical value of prophylactic indwelling ureteric stent during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Korean Med Sci 17:633–635 Ang C, Naik R (2009) The value of ureteric catheters in debulking surgery for disseminated ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecolog Cancer 19:978–980 Acknowledgments We would like to thank the medical, nursing and support staff involved in the clinical care of the patients included in this study. Conflict of interest We report no conflicts of interest. Ethical standard Not required for this clinical audit/study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Merritt, A.J., Crosbie, E.J., Charova, J. et al. Prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheters for major gynaecological surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 1061–1066 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2853-5 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2853-5

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Genital Neoplasms, Female Leiomyoma Preoperative Care Urinary Catheterization Acute Kidney Injury Acute Kidney Injury Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Endometriosis Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Humans Hysterectomy Leiomyoma Middle Aged Preoperative Care Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-25T06:10:03.373225+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:05.543671+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-25T06:41:39.333708+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine