Abstract
19
Here, we observed the reproductive behavior of marble -mouth frogfish ( Lophiocharon 20
lithinostomus) and the morphology of newly hatched juveniles under captive conditions. 21
Adult males showed pursuit behavior towards females approximately seven days before 22
spawning; spawning and ejaculation took place almost simultaneously. An adult female 23
cared for a fertilized egg mass adhered to their right of the left side of the flank. The 24
position of the adhered eggs on the flank was left-biased (3 on the right and 25 on the 25
left). The females exhibited a proactive fanning behavior towards the egg masses using 26
their dorsal fins; the fanning frequency increased over time after spawning. Meanwhile, 27
the males did not display any form of parental care behavior. The eggs had hook-like 28
structures that might enable the eggs to attach to the flank of the parent. Hatching 29
occurred between 22 and 28 days after spawning. Newly hatched juveniles already had 30
a full set of fin rays ; their morphology was similar to that of adult fish. Moreover, we 31
reviewed the evolution of parental care behaviors and egg types among frogfish family. 32
33
Keywords
34
Antennariidae, aquarium experiment, early ontogeny, egg care, parental care35
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Introduction
36
37
Antennariidae, the frogfish, belongs to the order Lophiiformes and consists of two 38
subfamilies: Antennariinae and Histiophryninae, with 14 genera (Pietsch and Arnold 39
2020). Frogfishes are found in all tropical and subtropical oceans and seas except for the 40
Mediterranean (Jordan and Richardson 1908; Pietsch 2004; Pietsch and Arnold 2020), 41
and they are predatory fishes (Arnold et al. 2014). Almost all frogfishes resemble 42
certain environmental objects, such as sponges, rocks, and coral (Arnold et al. 2014). 43
Cryptic colorations can help frogfishes avoid predation and misidentification by prey 44
(Arnold et al. 2014). Although the fishes in the family Antennariidae have diverse egg 45
types and reproductive behaviors (Pietsch and Grobecker 1980; Pietsch and Grobecker 46
1987; Kuiter 1993; Liem 1998; Pietsch et al. 2009; Arnold et al. 2014; Arnold and 47
Pietsch 2018; Pietsch and Arnold 2020; Bray and Gomon 2020), there are few detailed 48
studies on their reproduction. According to the few reports in the literature (Mito 1960; 49
Fries 1973; Pietsch and Grobecker 1987), the fishes in the family Antennariidae are 50
divided into two types of species that lay an aggregated pelagic egg (e.g., Antennarius 51
spp. and Histrio spp.) and demersal eggs (e.g., Histiophryne spp. and Lophiocharon 52
spp.) (Friese 1974; Molter 1983; Fujita and Uchida 1985; Arnold et al. 2014). 53
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
54
Some species of Antennariidae demonstrate egg care behavior. For instance, 55
Lophiocharon spp. cares for a demersal egg mass adhered to the flank of the parents 56
(Pietsch and Grobecker, 1980). Nevertheless, the sex of the parent engaging in egg care 57
remains unclear. For example, Pietsch and Grobecker (1980) reported that only male L. 58
trisignatus could care for their eggs; however, Pietsch and Arnold (2020) later observed 59
that Lophiocharon trisignatus females cared for their eggs. This confusion is likely due 60
to the difficulty in determining the sex of frogfishes based on their external 61
morphologies, although the females are usually are bigger than the males (Pietsch et al. 62
2013). Therefore, detailed studies of reproduction are needed to fully understand the 63
early-life history of frogfishes exhibiting various reproductive strategies. 64
65
Here, we report the sequences of spawning and egg care behavior of marble-mouth 66
frogfish (L. lithinostomus). This species inhabits coastal reefs of Indonesia and the 67
Philippines and resembles algae-covered rocks (Arnold and Pietsch 2012; Arnold et al. 68
2014). There have been no reports on the species’ reproductive behavior. In addition to 69
the analysis of the reproductive behavior, we report the unique egg structure adapting to 70
the egg care behavior by female parents and the morphology of newly hatched juveniles. 71
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Moreover, we review the evolution of parental care behaviors and egg types, pelagic or 72
demersal eggs, among frogfish families using limited available reports. 73
74
Materials and methods
75
Studied Fish 76
77
Ten adult L. lithinostomus, including four males with a standard length (SL) of 105.7 ± 78
15.6 mm and six females with an SL of 120.0 ± 10.1 mm, were obtained from the 79
ornamental fish company (Kamihata Fish Industries LTD, Hyogo, Japan) and identified 80
according to Pietsch (2004). The sexes of these individuals were determined by 81
dissection when they died. Moreover, we used one female with an SL of 89.5mm bred 82
by the Marine Science Museum, Fukushima. Thus, a total of 11 L. lithinostomus 83
individuals were used in this study. They were individually identified by observers 84
using their unique coloration and body morphology. The individuals used here have 85
been registered as voucher specimens in the Marine Science Museum, Fukushima 86
(registration number: AMF0053 and 0115). 87
88
Fishkeeping and reproduction 89
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
90
We used two water tanks in this study. Four fish (two males and two females) were held 91
in a 1-m3 water tank (1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 m) at 26.0℃ from 2016 to 2019, and six fish (two 92
males and five females) were held in a 0.45-m3 water tank (0.7 × 1.0 × 0.6 m) at 93
25.0 ℃ from 2018 to 2019. The fish were fed silver-stripe round herrings 94
(Spratelloides gracilis) once daily. Between 2016 and 2019, 28 spawning events were 95
observed. 96
97
Behavioral observation 98
99
When tracking behavior by the males toward the females was observed, we videotaped 100
their reproductive behaviors and continued throughout the day until spawning was 101
observed. Then, we recorded individuals that cared for eggs and the lateral surface of 102
the body to which the eggs were attached. 103
104
We quantified the investment in offspring by parents by conducting detailed behavioral 105
observation of four reproductive events (n = four females). Female parents attached 106
spawned eggs to the left or right flank and exhibited fanning behavior toward the eggs 107
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
using their dorsal fin. We count the fanning behavior for 10 min per day. This 108
behavioral observation was conducted between 8:00 and 17:00. Lastly, statistical 109
analysis was performed using R (R development core team 2020). 110
111
Morphology of Eggs and newly hatched juvenile 112
113
Because one female (137.8 mm SL) renounced an egg mass twice during observation, 114
we used these the egg masses for measurements of egg morphology. The number of 115
eggs per clutch was estimated by comparing the weight of fifty eggs and the weight of 116
egg mass. Egg size was measured using a stereomicroscope (ZEISS SteREO 117
Discovery.V12, ZEISS Research Microscopy Solution, Ltd., Germany). The egg mass 118
was not consumed by other fish because we sampled them right after it was renounced. 119
120
We observed the morphology of newly hatched juveniles by fixing them in 10% 121
formalin (n = 10). Their standard lengths were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm under a 122
microscope, according to Hubbs and Lagler (1958), after they were overdosed with an 123
anesthetic (MS-222, Wako Pure Chemical Industries). The number of fin ray of all fins 124
of the newly hatched juveniles were counted and compared with those of adult fish. The 125
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
observed individuals were deposited as voucher specimens (registration number: 126
AMF0127). We classified the newly hatched fish as "juveniles," according to the 127
developmental classification by Kendall et al. (1984) because their fin rays already 128
attained the full complement right after hatching. 129
130
Review of the evolution of egg care in the frogfish family 131
132
To understand the functional role of egg care behaviors and morphology of eggs in L. 133
lithinostomus, we performed a phylogenic analysis to examine the evolution of egg care 134
behaviors in the frogfish family. The data on the reproductive characteristics, such as 135
the size and number of eggs, egg types such as pelagic or demersal, and egg care 136
behaviors, were collected from the primary literature. Eventually, we found a total of 14 137
reports on the reproduction of 14 frogfish species. The egg care behaviors were 138
classified into four types according to Arnold et al. (2014): 1) Attaching to the body of 139
the parent (A-type); 2) carrying within a pocket of parent (P-type); 3) guarding in the 140
nest (N-type); 4) no egg care. In the species with A-type behavior, an egg mass is 141
attached to the lateral side of the parent’s body and nurtured (Pietsch and Grobecker 142
1980; Pietsch and Arnold 2020). In the species with P-type behavior, the parents 143
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
embrace their egg masses by curling their dorsal and anal fins (Pietsch and Grobecker 144
1987; Pietsch et al. 2009; Arnold and Pietsch 2018; Pietsch and Arnold 2020). Finally, 145
in species with N-type behavior, the parents spawn specific substrates and care for their 146
egg mass (Kuiter 1993; Liem 1998; Arnold et al. 2014; Bray and Gomon 2021). We also 147
recorded the flank that the A-type and P-type parents carried their egg mass because we 148
found a left-bias in egg caring on the flank in L. lithinostomus. 149
150
In addition, the presence or absence of egg care and egg types (pelagic or demersal) in 151
major species relative to frogfishes were recorded. Reports on the presence or absence 152
of egg care and egg types for coffinfish Chaunax abei (Mimori 2015), anglerfish 153
Lophius litulon (Ishikawa et al. 2022), and batfish Ogcocephalus nasutus (Christie 154
2016) were obtained. Although footballfishes (e.g., Himantolophus appelii) are also a 155
major species relative to frogfishes (Rabosky et al. 2018), we could not find reports on 156
their reproduction because they inhabit the deep sea. 157
158
For the phylogenetic analyses, the phylogenetic tree of frogfishes and related species 159
was obtained or modified from a previously published tree (Rabosky et al. 2018). This 160
tree was estimated using RAxML and dated using treePL, and non-target species were 161
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
excluded using the “droptip” function in R ver. 4.0.3 (R Core Team. 2014), package 162
“ape” (Paradis et al. 2004). Ancestral states of the egg were assessed by using Mesquite 163
Version 3.61 (Maddison and Maddison 2019) with the likelihood method in a Markov, 164
k-status, 1-parameter model, using the modified tree. The reconstruction of ancestral 165
states was conducted using 11 frogfish species and their related species because of their 166
clear phylogenetic relationships (Rabosky et al. 2018). 167
168
Results
169
Spawning behavior 170
171
During observation, we successfully videotaped three spawning behaviors 172
(Supplementary S1). Adult males and females were usually solitary in the water tank; 173
however, multiple males began to follow females approximately seven days before 174
spawning. When spawning began, a male ejaculated when a female released an egg 175
mass from its gonopore. Before the egg mass was attached to the side of the female, the 176
male left the female (Fig. 1a). A female attached the spawned egg mass to its side using 177
its caudal fin to wrap it around the lateral surface of its body. The egg mass was not 178
released into the water but transferred from the gonopore to the lateral surface of the 179
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
body (Fig. 1b). A female protected an egg mass by covering it with her dorsal, anal, and 180
caudal fins and occasionally fanned it with her dorsal fin (Supplementary S1). 181
182
Egg care and laterality of female parents 183
184
All egg care behaviors (n = 28) were performed only by the female parents, and no 185
males cared for the eggs, based on the spawning events by seven females. While one of 186
the females cared for its eggs on its right flank three times, 89.2 % of the egg masses 187
(25 out of 28 spawning events) were cared for on the left flank of the parent, suggesting 188
a significant bias towards egg care on the left flank (Pearson’s chi-squared test χ21 189
=37.605; p < .001). The number of fanning behaviors towards attached eggs varied 190
considerably, ranging from 0 to 537 per 10 min with a mean of 201.9 ± 148.6; it 191
increased from the day after spawning until fifteen days after spawning. However, after 192
that, the number of fanning behaviors remained unchanged (Fig. 2). Hatching began 22 193
to 23 days after spawning; almost all juveniles hatched by days 27 to 28. The juveniles 194
were scattered throughout the tank after hatching. 195
196
Morphological characteristics of eggs and newly hatched juveniles 197
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
198
The egg mass had an elliptic shape with a mean major axis of 91.2 mm and a mean 199
minor axis of 62.5 mm. The eggs were round; their average length was 2.9 ± 0.3 mm, 200
ranging from 2.4 to 4.1 mm (n = 50; from two egg masses from one female). The 201
coloration of eggs was semi-transparent white just after spawning. Eye pigmentation 202
was confirmed 11 days after spawning. Interestingly, demersal eggs had a unique 203
structure, an s-shaped hook (Fig. 3). Although juveniles (n = 10) had yolk sacs just after 204
hatching, all their fin rays already attained the full complement compared with the 205
adults (Fig. 4). The standard length (SL) of the newly hatched juveniles (n = 10) was 206
5.70 ± 0.20 mm, ranging from 5.40 to 6.09 mm. They already had esca, which was the 207
distinctive protuberance of this group used for predation as a lure; in addition, they 208
could swim freely and often they could attach to substrates in the water tank. 209
210
Evolution of egg care among frogfish family 211
212
We obtained 14 anecdotal or qualitative reports in the field associated with egg care 213
behaviors of frogfishes (Table 1). The species in Antennariinae do not display egg care 214
behaviors and have pelagic eggs. In contrast, the species in Histiophryninae have three 215
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
types of egg care behaviors, i.e., attaching to the body of the parent (A-type), carrying 216
within a pocket (P-type), and guarding at the nest (N-type). The species in 217
Histiophryninae have demersal eggs. Any form of egg care behavior has not been 218
reported from the species related to frogfishes. Ancestral state reconstruction revealed 219
that P-type and N-type egg care behaviors had been evolved independently from the 220
no-care species in Histiophryninae (Fig. 5). In addition, A-type care had been evolved 221
from a group within the P-type egg care (Fig. 5). 222
223
Discussion
224
225
In this study, we investigated the reproductive behavior of marble-mouth frogfish 226
(Lophiocharon lithinostomus). We found that multiple males stalked breeding females 227
before spawning, although only one male could participate in the spawning event. 228
Similar behavior by adult males before spawning has been observed in several fishes 229
and functions as mate guarding (Yokoi et al. 2016). Moreover, female filefish (Rudarius 230
ercodes) move around and choose any male following them as their reproductive 231
partners (Akagawa et al. 1998). Thus, the behavior of L. lithinostomus will be regarded 232
as a process of mate choice or mate guarding. For L. lithinostomus, fertilization 233
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
occurred immediately after the onset of spawning, and the male left the female before 234
the entire egg mass was laid. The time difference between fertilization and spawning did 235
not affect the fertilization rate, and most of the eggs were fertilized (Mori personal 236
observation). Fertilized eggs were covered with a gelatinous curtain. Since the activity 237
time of the sperms in the ovarian cavity fluid of females plays an important role in 238
fertilization, the gelatinous membrane covering the eggs may play a role similar to the 239
ovarian cavity fluid (Hayakawa and Munehara 2001). 240
241
We found that only females attached egg masses to their flanks and began to fan the egg 242
masses after spawning. Also, regarding L. trisignatus, a related species to L. 243
lithinostomus, only female parents care for egg masses (Pietsch and Arnold 2020). In 244
many species in the frogfish family (Antennariidae), the females are larger and have 245
larger abdomens than the males (Pietsch et al. 2013). Moreover, according to the reports 246
on the sexual dimorphism in frogfishes, there are sexual differences in the number of 247
dermal spinules in striated frogfish (Antennarius scaber) (Breder and Rosen 1966). 248
However, no definitive sex differences have been found among frogfishes. Therefore, 249
the study of the sex of the frogfishes caring for egg mass should be reconsidered. 250
251
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
More generally, the morphologies of newly hatched and developing teleost fishes are 252
incomplete compared with adults (Mosher 1954; Ehrlich et al. 1976; Martin and Drewry 253
1978; Kendall et al. 1984; Satoh et al. 2017). In some species, the mouth and anus of 254
the newly hatched larvae do not open, making feeding impossible (Satoh et al. 2017). 255
Even with an open mouth, it would be difficult for the larvae to catch small prey with 256
fin folds due to their low swimming ability (Satoh et al. 2017). Therefore, 257
morphological ontogeny can highly influence early-life history, especially foraging 258
ecology (Satoh et al. 2017). For example, the newly hatched larvae of frogfishes in the 259
Antennariinae with pelagic eggs, such as Histrio histrio, do not have advanced 260
organogenesis (Mosher 1954). In contrast, the newly hatched juveniles of L. 261
lithinostomus already have open mouths, and all their fin rays attain the full 262
complement, suggesting that they already have had robust foraging abilities 263
immediately after hatching. 264
265
The dispersal of many marine fishes is commonly concentrated in egg or early larval 266
stages (Barlow 1981; James et al. 2002). However, the dispersal ability of L. 267
lithinostomus would be even lower than the pelagic egg group, such as Histrio histro 268
and Antennarius striatus, because L. lithinostomus eggs do not float and are cared for by 269
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
the female parents. Indeed, frogfishes in Histiophryninae have a smaller distribution 270
area than those in Antennariinae and highly depend on the specific local area (Arnold 271
and Pietsch 2012). In general, species with a low dispersal ability are more susceptible 272
to local environmental changes (Baguette et al. 2012; Gonçalves et al. 2016). Recently, 273
the deterioration of the coastal environment, including coral reefs, has been reported 274
(Kennish 2002). Trends in species such as L. lithinostomus, which are presumed to be 275
less tolerant of environmental changes, should be all eyes. 276
277
According to the ancestral state reconstruction, three types of egg care had evolved only 278
among the species of Histiophryninae, which have demersal eggs, from non-egg care 279
species. These findings suggested that egg care behaviors had co-evolved with demersal 280
eggs. Demersal eggs are generally larger than pelagic eggs, and the fry can hatch with 281
advanced organogenesis (Sargent et al. 1987; Araujo‐Lima 1994). Indeed, we found 282
newly hatched juveniles of L. lithinostomus had highly advanced organogenesis. 283
However, demersal eggs stick to substrates and thus, cannot change location. Therefore, 284
demersal eggs will be exposed to high predation pressure unless they have a chemical 285
defense or camouflage coloration (Eisner et al. 2000; Ruxton et al. 2004; Skelhorn 286
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
2015). The frogfishes of Histiophryninae may have evolved egg care as a 287
counter-strategy to avoid the high predation pressure applied on demersal eggs. 288
289
The N-type egg care is thought to have evolved independently of these lineages. Also, 290
we found that A-type egg care may have evolved from P-type egg care. It would be very 291
unusual for diverse modes of egg care to evolve among closely related species. In 292
species with P-type egg care, female parents embrace their egg masses by curling dorsal 293
and anal fins into a pocket-like structure (Arnold et al. 2014). In contrast, egg masses 294
are adhered to the flank for fishes with A-type egg care, such as L. lithinostomus. We 295
found an s-shaped hook structure in the egg masses of L. lithinostomus. This structure 296
may function as adhesives to attach the egg masses to the flank of female parents so that 297
the eggs are tightly glued to the parental body. Indeed, when a female parent abandoned 298
the glued eggs, she shook her body vigorously to remove the eggs. (Mori personal 299
observation). 300
301
The number of eggs varies between egg care types. For example, speceis with N-type 302
has the highest number of eggs at approximately 5000 eggs (n = 1 species), followed by 303
A-type with 320 to 1311 eggs (n = 2 species) and P-type with 105 to 220 eggs (n = 3 304
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
species) (Table 1). The number of eggs by N-type fish will not be limited because the 305
fish spawn egg masses on a substrate (Arnold et al. 2014). However, in A-type and 306
P-type, the size of egg masses will be restricted by the flank of the parents because the 307
fish attach or entrap their eggs to the body (Arnold et al. 2014). Although they are 308
constrained by the number of eggs they can spawn in one reproductive event, the 309
parents with A- and P-type egg care can migrate while raising their eggs. Additionally, 310
the species with A-type egg care have more eggs than those with P-type egg care (Table 311
1). In general, oxygen demand, hence the frequency of fanning, increases with 312
embryonic development (Abe and Munehara 2005). Unlike a P-type species, an A-type 313
species can use its dorsal fins for fanning behavior, likely allowing it to hold more eggs, 314
even though the number of eggs is limited by body size (Bagenal and Braum 1978; 315
Warner 1984). Although these comparisons are constrained by the simplicity of the 316
evolution of egg care modes among frogfishes, they suggest that the number of eggs 317
will vary depending on the egg care mode. 318
319
Finally, we found that L. lithinostomus females preferred to use the left side of their 320
bodies for egg care. Interestingly, they also appeared able to use their right flank for egg 321
care because one female used the right flank. Lateralized (left-right asymmetry) 322
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
morphology and behavior among fishes have been reported in many species (Takeuchi 323
et al. 2016; Hori et al. 2017). Because left-biased egg care was not detected in species 324
with A-type egg care (L: R = 3:2 from 5 reports for 3 species, Table 1) but L. trisignatus 325
also displayed left-biased egg care similar to L. lithinostomus (Table 1), this tendency 326
may have co-evolved with A-type egg care. However, we could not determine why L. 327
lithinostomus females used their left side for egg care; this interesting phenomenon 328
requires further morphological or evolutionary validation. 329
330
Acknowledgments 331
332
We are grateful to Mr. Yoshitaka Abe and Mr. Takeshi Furukawa of Aquamarine 333
Fukushima for cooperation for fishkeeping. We would also like to thank Dr. Toshiro 334
Saruwatari and Dr. Toru Miura of University of Tokyo, Dr. Takashi Asahida and Dr. Go 335
Katayose of Kitasato University, and Dr. Atsushi Sogabe of Hirosaki University for the 336
comments on our study. We would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for their 337
helpful comments. 338
339
References
340
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Abe T, Munehara H (2005) Spawning and maternal‐care behaviours of a copulating 341
sculpin, Radulinopsis taranetzi. Journal of Fish Biology 67(1): 201–212. 342
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00728.x 343
344
Araujo‐Lima CARM (1994) Egg size and larval development in Central Amazonian 345
fish. Journal of Fish Biology 44(3): 371–389. 346
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01219.x 347
348
Arnold RJ, Pietsch TW (2018) Fantastic beasts and where to find them: a new species of 349
the frogfish genus Histiophryne Gill (Lophiiformes: Antennariidae: Histiophryninae) 350
from Western and South Australia, with a revised key to congeners. Copeia 106(4): 351
622–631. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-18-112 352
353
Akagawa I, Kanda T, Okiyama M (1998). Female mate choice through spawning parade 354
formed by male-male competition in filefish Rudarius ercodes. Journal of Ethology 355
16(2): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769289 356
357
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Arnold RJ, Harcourt R, Pietsch TW (2014) A new genus and species of the frogfish 358
family Antennariidae (Teleostei: Lophiiformes: Antennarioidei) from New South Wales, 359
Australia, with a diagnosis and key to the genera of the Histiophryninae. Copeia 360
2014(3): 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-13-155 361
362
Bagenal TB, Braum E (1978) Eggs and early life history. In: Bagenal TB (ed) Fish 363
reproduction in freshwaters. Blackwell, Oxford, 165–201. 364
365
Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM (2012) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford 366
University Press, 498 pp. 367
368
Bray DJ, Gomon MF (eds) (2021) Fishes of Australia. Museums Victoria and 369
OzFishNet. http://fishesofaustralia.net.au/ [Accessed on 19 January 2021] 370
371
Barlow GW (1981) Patterns of parental investment, dispersal and size among coral-reef 372
fishes. In Ecology and ethology of fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, 65–85. 373
374
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Breder GMJ, Rosen DE (1966) Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural History Press, 375
Garden City, NY, 941 pp. 376
377
Christie BL, Monyoya PZ, Torres LA, John WF (2016) The natural history and 378
husbandry of the walking batfishes (Lphiformes: Ogcocephalidae). Drum and Croaker 379
47: 6–40. 380
381
Ehrlich KF, Blaxter JHS, Pemberton R (1976) Morphological and histological changes 382
during the growth and starvation of herring and plaice larvae. Marine Biology 35(2): 383
105–118. 384
385
Eisner T, Eisner M, Rossini C, Iyengar VK, Roach BL, Benedikt E, Meinwald J (2000) 386
Chemical defense against predation in an insect egg. Proceedings of the National 387
Academy of Sciences 97(4): 1634–1639. 388
389
Friese UE (1973) Anglerfishes. Marine Aquarist 4(5): 29–36. 390
391
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Fujita S, Uchida K (1959) Spawning habits and early development of a sargassum fish, 392
Pterophryne histrio (‘Linne’). Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu 393
University 17(3): 277–282. 394
395
Gonçalves J, Honrado JP, Vicente JR, Civantos E (2016) A model-based framework for 396
assessing the vulnerability of low dispersal vertebrates to landscape fragmentation 397
under environmental change. Ecological Complexity 28: 174–186. 398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.05.003 399
400
Hayakawa Y , Munehara H (2001) Facultatively internal fertilization and anomalous 401
embryonic development of a non-copulatory sculpin Hemilepidotus gilberti Jordan and 402
Starks (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 256 (1): 51–58. 403
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00303-8 404
405
Hori M, Nakajima M, Hata H, Yasugi M, Takahashi S, Nakae M, Kosaku Yamaoka, 406
Masanori Kohda, Jyun-ichi Kitamura, Masayoshi Marhata, Hirokazu Tanaka, Norihiro 407
Okada, Takeuchi Y (2017) Laterality is universal among fishes but increasingly cryptic 408
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
among derived groups. Zoological Science 34(4): 267–274. 409
https://doi.org/10.2108/zs160196 410
411
Hubbs CL, Lagler KF (1958) Fishes of the great lakes region. Bull. Carbrook Inst. Sci 412
26: 1–213. 413
414
I.O.P. diving news (2001) 139, V ol.12, No.10, pp.1. 415
416
Ishikawa T, Nakaya M, Takatsu T (2022) Embryonic development and effect of water 417
temperature on hatching of Lophius litulon. Environmental Biology of Fishes 105, 77–418
86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01195-4 419
420
James MK, Armsworth PR, Mason LB, Bode L (2002) The structure of reef fish 421
metapopulations: modelling larval dispersal and retention patterns. Proceedings of the 422
Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269(1505): 2079–2086. 423
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2128 424
425
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Jordan DS, Richardson RE (1908) Fishes from islands of the Philoppine Archipelago. 426
Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 27: 233–287. 427
428
Kendall AW Jr, Ahlstrom EH, Moser HG (1984) Early life history stages of fishes and 429
their characters. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, 430
Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes, Am Soc Ichthyol Herpetol 431
Spec Publ No 1. Allen Press, Lawrence, 11–22. 432
433
Kennish MJ (2002) Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. 434
Environmental Conservation 29(1): 78–107. 435
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000061 436
437
Kuiter RH (1993) Coastal Fishes of South-Eastern Australia. University of Hawaii Press, 438
Honolulu, Hawaii, 437 pp. 439
440
Liem KF (1998) Introducing fishes. In: Paxton JR, Eschemeyer WN (ed) Encyclopedia 441
of Fishes, 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 14–19. 442
443
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Martin FD, Drewry GE (1978) Development of fishes of the Mid-Atlantic Bight. An 444
atlas of egg, larval and juvenile stages. VI. Stromateidae through Ogcocephalidae U S 445
Fish Wild Serv Biol Serv Prog. FWS/OBS-78/12: 1–416. 446
447
Molter TJ (1983) A spawning of the Atlantic anglerfish Antennarius scaber. Cuvier. 448
Freshwater and Marine Aquarium 6(1): 34–35, 66, 69. 449
450
Mosher C (1954) Observations on the behavior and the early larval development of the 451
Sargasum fish Histrio histrio (Linnaeus). Zoologica 39: 141–152. 452
453
Mimori R (2015) 454
https://www.tokyo-zoo.net/topic/topics_detail?kind=news&inst=&link_num=22733 455
[Accessed on 20 February 2022] 456
457
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution 458
in R language. Bioinformatics 20(2): 289–290. 459
460
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Pietsch TW (2004) A new species of the anglerfish genus Lophiocharon Whiteley 461
(Lophiiformes: Antennaridae) from Australian waters. Records of the Australian 462
Museum 56(2): 159–162. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.56.2004.1418 463
464
Pietsch TW, Grobecker DB (1980) Parental care as an alternative reproductive mode in 465
an antennariid anglerfish. Copeia 1980: 551–553. 466
467
Pietsch TW, Grobecker DB (1987) Frogfishes of the world: systematics, zoogeography, 468
and behavioral ecology. Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA, 420 pp. 469
470
Pietsch TW, Arnold RJ (2020) Forogfishes: biodiversity, zoogeography, and behavioral 471
ecology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 624 pp. 472
473
Pietsch TW, Arnold RJ, Hall DW (2009) A bizarre new species of frogfish of the genus 474
Histiophryne from Ambon and Bali, Indonesia. Copeia 2009: 37–45. 475
476
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Pietsch TW, Ross SW, Caruso JH, Saunders MG, Fisher CR (2013) In-situ observations 477
of deep-sea goosefish sladenia shafersi caruso and bulis (Lophiiformes: Lophiidae), 478
with evidence of extreme sexual dimorphism. Copeia 2013(4): 660–665. 479
480
Rabosky DL, Chang J, Cowman PF, Sallan L, Friedman M., Kaschner K, Garilao C 481
Near TJ, M Coll, Alfaro ME (2018) An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for 482
marine fishes. Nature 559: 392–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0273-1 483
484
Ruxton G, Sherratt T, Speed M (2004) Avoiding attack: The evolutionary ecology of 485
crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 278 pp. 486
487
Sargent RC, Taylor PD, Gross MR (1987) Parental care and the evolution of egg size in 488
fishes. The American Naturalist 129(1): 32–46. 489
490
Satoh S, Tanoue H, Ruitton S, Mohri M, Komatsu T (2017) Morphological and 491
behavioral ontogeny in larval and early juvenile discus fish Symphysodon 492
aequifasciatus. Ichthyological Research 64(1): 37–44. 493
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-016-0530-y 494
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
495
Skelhorn, J (2015) Masquerade. Current Biology 25: 643–644. 496
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.069 497
498
Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2019) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary 499
analysis. Version 3. http://www.mesquiteproject.org. 500
501
Takeuchi Y , Hori M, Tada S, Oda Y (2016) Acquisition of lateralized predation behavior 502
associated with development of mouth asymmetry in Lake Tanganyika scale-eating 503
cichlid fish. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147476 504
505
Yokoi S, Ansai S, Kinoshita M, Naruse K, Kamei Y , Young LJ, T Okuyama Takeuchi H 506
(2016) Mate-guarding behavior enhances male reproductive success via familiarization 507
with mating partners in medaka fish. Frontiers in Zoology 13(1): 1–10. 508
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-016-0152-2 509
510
Warner RR (1984) Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral reef fishes. American 511
Scientist 72: 128–136. 512
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
513
514
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Table 1. Comparison of reproduction modes for frogfish family Antennaridae. 515
Species Egg size (mm) The number of eggs Type of egg Parental care mode Laterality of body side used for egg care Reference(s)
Antennariinae
Antennarius striatus 0.6 89635 pelagic No care - Fujita and Uchida 1959
Antennarius nummifer 0.7 73000–288000 pelagic No care - Piestch and Grobecker 1987
Histrio histro 0.7 48800 pelagic No care - Ray 1961
Histiophryninae
Histiophryne cryptacanthus 3.6–4.2 115 demersal P-type L:R = 1:0 (n = 1 report) Piestch and Grobecker 1987
Histiophryne bouganivilli 3.2–3.9 105 demersal P-type L:R = 1:1 (n = 2 reports) Piestch and Arnold 2020
Histiophryne psychedelica 3.0–4.0 220 demersal P-type L:R = 1:1 (n = 2 reports) Piestch et al. 2009; Piestch and Arnold 2020
Histiophryne narungga No data No data demersal P-type No data Arnold and Piestch 2018
Lophiocharon trisignatus 3.2–3.6 650 demersal A-type L:R = 4:0 (n = 4 reports) Piestch and Grobecker 1980; Piestch and Arnold 2020
Lophiocharon lithinostomus 2.1–4.1 320–1311 demersal A-type L:R = 26:3 (n = 3 reports) I.O.P Diving News 2001; Piestch and Arnold 2020; Present study
Echinophryne crassispina No data 150 demersal N-type - Liem 1998; Bray and Gomon 2021
Echioophryne reynoldsi No data No data demersal N-type - Bray and Gomon 2021
Rhycherus filamentosus 5.0 5000 demersal N-type - Kuiter 1993; Bray and Gomon 2021
Porophryne erythrodactylus No data No data demersal N-type - Arnold et al. 2014
Phyllophryne scortea No data No data demersal N-type - Bray and Gomon 2021
516
A-type: attaching to the body of the parent, P-type: carrying within a pocket of parent, N-type: guarding in the nest. 517
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Figure and legends 518
519
Figure 1. A Photograph of a gravid female (dark brown color) marble-mouth frogfish 520
Lophiocharon lithinostomus) surrounded by two courting males (green color). B Female 521
marble-mouth frogfish with egg mass attached on the left side of bodies. 522
523
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Figure 2. Relationship between days after spawning and the frequency of fanning 524
behavior by female marble-mouth frogfish Lophiocharon lithinostomus. A solid line 525
and a grey area indicate the loess regression and 95% Confidence interval, respectively. 526
527
Figure 3. Photograph of fertilized eggs and gelatinous curtains with S-shaped hooks 528
surrounding the eggs. White scale bar: 2 mm. 529
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
530
Figure 4. Photographs of a marble-mouth frogfish Lophiocharon lithinostomus juvenile 531
just after hatching. A Overhead view. B Lateral view. White scale bar: 1 mm. 532
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
533
Figure 5. Evolution and phylogenetic distribution of the forms egg care in 534
Antennariidae and related species. The ultrametric tree was modified from Rabosky et 535
al. (2018). Egg care behaviors were classified into four types: 1) Attaching to the body 536
of the parent (blue); 2) carrying within a pocket of a parent (green); 3) guarding in the 537
nest (black); 4) no egg care (white). 538
539
ESM S1 540
Spawning and fanning behavior of marble-mouth frogfish Lophiocharon lithinostomus. 541
542
Author-formatted, not peer-reviewed document posted on 06/04/2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84895
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.