Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes that leads to open sores found on the lower extremity, ultimately decreasing the quality of life. The purpose of this study is to systematically review randomized control trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation therapy on healing wounds in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The search was conducted across the databases of PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria consisted of RCTs that compared relaxation therapy to standard care or other psychological/psychosocial intervention. The primary outcomes looked at were DFU healing, DFU extent, and perceived stress scale. The study included 3 RCTs that enrolled 75 patients with diabetic foot ulcers. It was found that within-intervention, relaxation therapy led to improved DFU healing, DFU extent, and participants were less stressed. Despite this, no evidence was found that suggested that relaxation therapy significantly improves outcomes compared to standard care or neutral imagery. Overall, it cannot be concluded that relaxation therapy has an effect on outcomes as there isn’t enough RCTs to come to a conclusion. Future research should delve into long-term effects of relaxation therapy on wound healing in patients with DFU, as well as compare it to other implemented therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy.
Full text 35,303 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials View ORCID Profile Daanyal Noor Farrukh , Misbah Munaf Gaurd , Mohammad Dawood Farrukh , Fiza Farrukh-Hassan doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.26.25326493 Daanyal Noor Farrukh 1 Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daanyal Noor Farrukh For correspondence: farrukhd{at}mcmaster.ca Misbah Munaf Gaurd 2 Department of Interdisciplinary Sciences, McMaster University Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mohammad Dawood Farrukh 3 Aitchison College , Lahore PK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Fiza Farrukh-Hassan 4 MountainView Hospital , Las Vegas, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes that leads to open sores found on the lower extremity, ultimately decreasing the quality of life. The purpose of this study is to systematically review randomized control trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation therapy on healing wounds in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The search was conducted across the databases of PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria consisted of RCTs that compared relaxation therapy to standard care or other psychological/psychosocial intervention. The primary outcomes looked at were DFU healing, DFU extent, and perceived stress scale. The study included 3 RCTs that enrolled 75 patients with diabetic foot ulcers. It was found that within-intervention, relaxation therapy led to improved DFU healing, DFU extent, and participants were less stressed. Despite this, no evidence was found that suggested that relaxation therapy significantly improves outcomes compared to standard care or neutral imagery. Overall, it cannot be concluded that relaxation therapy has an effect on outcomes as there isn’t enough RCTs to come to a conclusion. Future research should delve into long-term effects of relaxation therapy on wound healing in patients with DFU, as well as compare it to other implemented therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy. 1.0 Introduction Approximately 18.6 million people worldwide (including 1.6 million in the USA) are affected by diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) each year, often contributing to 80% of lower extremity amputations among diabetic patients ( Armstrong et al., 2023 ). In the USA alone, the mean cost of treatment per patient per year who suffers from DFU can range from $3368 to $30131 ( Lo et al., 2021 ). The two facts alone tell us that treatment for DFU can cost anywhere from 5.4 billion USD to 48 billion USD, putting significant burden on the healthcare cost ( Armstrong et al., 2023 ; Lo et al., 2021 ). This financial strain is further compounded by the clinical challenges of managing DFUs. The most common prognosis of DFU is minor or major amputation, with their free survival rate showing 56.9% and 91.0% at 5 years, suggesting DFU is often slow to heal and highly recurrent ( Armstrong et al., 2023 ). In addition to physiological factors such as peripheral arterial disease and diabetic neuropathy, psychological stress has emerged as a critical yet underrecognized barrier to wound healing ( Wang et al., 2022 ; Fereira et al., 2023b). Chronic stress can impair immune function, elevate inflammatory responses, and disrupt tissue regeneration, factors that are especially detrimental in individuals with diabetes ( Pradhan et al., 2009 ; Gouin et al., 2010 ; Kuebler et al., 2013 ). While conventional management of DFUs involves glycemic control, debridement, pressure offloading, and infection prevention, recent attention has shifted toward the influence of psychosocial factors, particularly chronic psychological stress, in delaying wound healing ( Wang et al., 2022 ; Fereira et al., 2023a; Fereira et al., 2023b; Pereira et al., 2025 ). Chronic stress is known to impair immune function, increase cortisol levels, prolong inflammation, and hinder angiogenesis, all processes critical to effective tissue repair. Relaxation therapies, such as progressive muscle relaxation, and guided imagery, are potential tools to reduce stress in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. There have been many studies that synthesized the evidence to show that relaxation therapy is effective at treating different types of wounds, such as patients with burns, or patients who underwent surgery and are recovering ( Kutenai et al., 2023 ; Broadbent et al., 2012 ). Despite this, there have been no prior systematic reviews that have comprehensively synthesized the evidence on relaxation therapy specifically as a therapeutic for DFU healing outcomes. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation therapy on wound healing outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Specifically, we aimed to assess changes in wound healing rates, DFU extent, and perceived stress levels through synthesis of literature that implements relaxation-based interventions alongside standard practices and compare it to a passive or active control group. In addition, we hope to assess the psychological benefits of relaxation therapy, such as reductions in stress, and how relaxation therapy affects pain levels, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Overall, we will explore the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating relaxation techniques as adjunct therapies in DFU management protocols. 2.0 Methodology 2.1 INFORMATION SOURCES A comprehensive search of the literature for primary sources was undertaken in the following sources: PubMed Central (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. 2.2 SEARCH STRATEGY Each source was searched independently. The search strategy was developed using keywords and subject headings, where available, related to the diabetic foot ulcers AND wound healing AND relaxation therapy. The complete search strings for each database used are included in Supplementary S1. The article searches were limited to within the last 10 years (2015 – 2025) and english. The search strategy for each source was peer-reviewed by two independent reviewers. A final search was run, and references were exported on 17 April, 2025. 2.3 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We established specific criteria for study inclusion in this systematic review. Studies of any design that reported on relaxation therapy and diabetic foot wounds were considered eligible. Clinical trials, including randomized clinical trials, involving human subjects were included. References were uploaded into Microsoft Excel for deduplication and screening. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts of the identified studies and reviewed the full texts of the studies that were deemed potentially eligible. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through consensus discussions. 2.4 DATA COLLECTION AND EXTRACTION PROCESS Data related to the application of relaxation therapy in the context of chronic wound healing were systematically extracted from each included study. 3.0 Results Figure 1 . Illustrates a flow diagram of our search results. It illustrated that initially 43 results were retrieved from 5 sources. After duplicates were removed, screening was narrowed down to 24 articles. After reviewing full-text articles, 7 studies were excluded due to being irrelevant, leaving 17 full-text articles for screening. Further screening resulted in 13 articles being excluded for not meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. The excluded articles included articles that utilized wrong outcome of measures, or were not randomized control trials. Table 1 . Illustrates key information for all included studies. View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. Description of the studies investigating the effects of different relaxation therapies in participants with diabetic foot ulcers. I/C: Intervention/Control; RCT: Randomized Control Trial; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; DFU: Diabetic Foot Ulcers; PSS: Perceived Stress Scale; EG: Experimental Group; ACG: Active Control Group; PCG: Passive Control Group. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram; This diagram shows the systematic process we followed to include papers captured by our search. 3.1 DIABETIC FOOT ULCER HEALING AND EXTENT Two articles evaluated wound healing progress across interventions using the Resvech 2.0 assessment tool, whereas one article looked at DFU extent as well ( Pereira et al., 2025 ; Ferreira et al., 2023a ). In a research study by Pereira et al. (2025) , DFU healing was measured using the Resvech 2.0 assessment tool ( Pereira et al., 2025 ). Significant improvements within intervention groups were noted between the baseline and post-intervention for patients that were administered muscle relaxation therapy (β = −5.88, p < 0.001) as well as between the baseline and follow-up (β = −8.39, p < 0.001) ( Pereira et al., 2025 ). This information is supported in a study by Fereira et al. (2023a), where it was found that DFU healing score had significantly increased from baseline to post-intervention, and baseline to follow-up (β = −5.67, p < 0.001; β = −8.20, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significant differences between the intervention and passive control group in DFU healing (β = 4.54, p = 0.02) ( Pereira et al., 2025 ). Despite this, Fereira et al. (2023a) contradicts the findings of Pereira et al. (2025) , indicating that DFU healing is not significantly different between intervention and passive control groups (β = 2.816,p > 0.05). In a research study by Fereira et al. (2023a), significant improvements were noted in DFU extent within the intervention group between the baseline and post-intervention (β = −3.45, p < 0.05) as well as between the baseline and follow-up (β = −3.55, p < 0.05). 3.2 PERCEIVED STRESS SCALE Two articles evaluated perceived stress scale (PSS) across interventions ( Pereira et al., 2025 ; Ferreira et al., 2023a ). In a research study by Pereira et al. (2025) , significant improvements within intervention groups were noted between the baseline and post-intervention for patients that were administered muscle relaxation therapy (β = −5.25, p 0.05). Furthermore, it was found that PSS had significantly increased from baseline to post-intervention, and baseline to follow-up (β = −5.38, p < 0.001; β = −4.61, p 0.05) ( Pereira et al., 2025 ).Fereira et al. (2023a) reinforces the findings of Pereira et al. (2025) , indicating that PSS is not significantly different between intervention and passive control groups (β = 2.647, p > 0.05). 3.3 QUALITATIVE MEASURES In Fereira et al. (2023b), five themes emerged that addressed the suitability of relaxation therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: perception of intervention, perception regarding distress, perception regarding technique, changes in the patient’s life, and changes in DFU. Patients with DFUs reported significant emotional distress, particularly fear of amputation. Witnessing others with amputations heightened anxiety, and some expressed hopelessness even after surgery, highlighting the psychological burden associated with the condition. Patients were unfamiliar with relaxation techniques but reported feeling calm, relieved, and emotionally uplifted after sessions. Some noted physical benefits, including improved circulation and foot sensitivity. Overall, participants were highly satisfied and recommended the intervention to others with DFUs. The relaxation intervention promoted more positive thinking among patients, shifting focus away from fear and toward healing. Some also reported improved interpersonal relationships, highlighting broader emotional and social benefits beyond physical symptom relief. Patients noticed improvements in their DFUs, including reduced wound size, but expressed uncertainty about relaxation’s direct role in healing. Many viewed it as a complementary approach that eased psychological stress and potentially supported the body’s healing process. 4.0 Discussion Overall, the systematic review found that relaxation therapy, including progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, was associated with significant within-group improvements in DFU healing, DFU extent, and PSS from baseline to follow-up ( Pereira et al., 2025 ; Fereira et al., 2023a). This suggests that relaxation therapy is an effective treatment for DFU, as it improves healing, decreases DFU extent and results in patients having lower outcomes of distress and stress long-term ( Pereira et al., 2025 ; Fereira et al., 2023a). Despite this, when compared to an active control group that received 4 neutral imagery sessions, it was found that there was no significant difference between DFU healing, DFU extent, and PSS (p > 0.05), suggesting that relaxation therapy, though effective at healing, does not produce any different outcomes from other psychosocial treatments. To place these findings in a broader context, it is important to consider prior literature evaluating the role of psychological interventions and stress in wound healing. Comparing findings to other studies on psychological interventions in chronic wound healing or diabetes management, we find that psychological and psychosocial interventions yield positive effects on wound healing ( Robinson et al., 2017 ; Muhrawi et al., 2022 ). In a systematic review, Robinson et al. (2017) highlighted that psychological interventions consistently yield a positive outcome on wound healing, reporting effect sizes ranging from 0.53 to 1.89 across surgical wounds. Muhrawi et al. (2022) identified this correlation as a critical risk factor in individuals with chronic wounds, reinforcing the notion that addressing psychological well-being is paramount in managing these patients. This suggests the need for more empathy-centered care, as validating concerns can improve patient outcomes before surgery and postoperative during the wound healing process. Moreover, psychological factors have been shown to establish a relationship with diabetic foot ulcers, where mental health can both impede and reflect the state of wound healing. More broadly, the relationship between stress and wound healing is directly addressed by the treatment of relaxation therapy for stress in patients (Fereira et al., 2023b). Similar interventions that target stress reduction have been associated with healing delays, indicating that psychosocial factors can influence outcomes ( Robinson et al., 2017 ; Gouin & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2012). These findings align with meta-analytic evidence suggesting a statistically significant negative correlation between stress and wound healing across various studies ( Walburn et al., 2009 ; Gouin & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2012). The interplay between stress and wound healing is noteworthy due to multiple biological mechanisms that mediate this relationship as research has shown that psychological stress can significantly hinder wound healing by altering hormonal responses, inflammatory pathways, and immune system functions. Glucocorticoids play a major role in this process, as elevated cortisol levels occur due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis while under stress ( Herman et al., 2016 ). Increased glucocorticoid levels inhibit the expression of cytokines, such as interleukin-1, which are crucial pro-inflammatory cytokines that initiate the wound healing process ( Marucha et al., 1998 ; Glaser et al., 1999 ). Furthermore, deficiencies in keratinocyte growth can be disrupted by stress as it disrupts glucocorticoid secretion, decreasing the extent of skin repair ( Marucha et al., 1998 ). In addition, delayed healing can be caused by a heightened level of catecholamine due to stress, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine, leading to vasoconstriction and a reduction in blood flow to the wound, shrinking the oxygen supply and nutrient delivery to repair mechanisms (Romana-Souza et al., 2010; Razjouyan et al., 2017 ; Jozic et al., 2017 ). This overall results in a significantly impaired healing process ( Muhrawi et al., 2022 ; Pradhan et al., 2009 ). The role of the immune system is also pivotal, as studies have indicated that psychological stress correlates with diminished expression of inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-8 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α ( Pradhan et al., 2009 ; Gouin et al., 2010 ). This is further reinforced by Kuebler et al. (2013) , where it was found that stress is linked to a reduction in immune response, as macrophages exhibit impaired microbicidal activity in the presence of stress hormones. Overall, stress has been linked to affect both early and late inflammatory phases of wound healing, which is crucial for preventing infections and promoting adequate healing respectively ( Christian et al., 2006 ; Glaser et al., 1999 ). Stress adversely affects wound healing through a multifaceted mechanism involving hormonal changes, altered immune responses, and disruptions in inflammatory signaling pathways, which collectively undermine the body’s natural repair processes. Clinically, these findings suggest that integrating stress-reduction techniques into standard DFU care protocols may not only benefit wound healing outcomes, but also improve patient engagement, emotional well-being, and adherence to recommended treatments such as foot offloading (Fereira et al., 2023b). Given the relatively low cost and non-invasive nature of relaxation therapies, their use as complementary interventions warrants broader clinical investigation and implementation. Despite this, the systematic review is limited due to a number of variables. This review utilized a small number of included studies, resulting in the review not being conclusive. On top of this, all articles included took place in Portugal, further limiting the generalizability of the therapy on the greater population. Additionally, the intervention and control groups revealed mixed results, failing to indicate that relaxation therapy is superior to other psychosocial interventions. The studies failed to effectively blind participants and personnel as psychologists employed to carry out the treatment were not blinded to what treatment they would be delivering. In the future, more research should delve into the possibility of implementing this therapy complementary to other interventions in diverse settings with standardized protocols. Research that includes biomarkers of stress and long-term ulcer recurrence should be conducted to come to a more conclusive answer. Relaxation therapy should also be compared to other more widely accepted psychological/psychosocial therapies, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, guided imagery, and standard education. If clinical implementation becomes a goal in the future, researchers need to conduct an economical analysis of this treatment to measure the cost-effectiveness of relaxation therapy. 5.0 Conclusion This systematic review evaluated the impact of relaxation therapy on wound healing outcomes among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The findings suggest that relaxation therapies, such as progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, are associated with significant within-group improvements in DFU healing, extent, and perceived stress levels. However, when compared to active or passive controls, no significant differences were observed, indicating that relaxation therapy may be beneficial but not necessarily superior to other psychosocial interventions. Importantly, the review highlights the potential role of psychological stress as a modifiable factor in wound healing, consistent with broader literature linking stress reduction to improved physiological outcomes. Nevertheless, the limited number of high-quality randomized controlled trials, small sample sizes, and lack of geographic diversity restrict the generalizability of the conclusions. Moreover, methodological limitations, including insufficient blinding, further temper the strength of the evidence. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter trials that directly compare relaxation therapy to other psychosocial interventions, incorporate objective biomarkers of stress, and assess long-term clinical outcomes, including ulcer recurrence and quality of life. Additionally, economic evaluations are warranted to determine the cost-effectiveness of integrating relaxation therapies into standard DFU care. Overall, while preliminary evidence is promising, more rigorous research is needed to substantiate the clinical utility of relaxation therapy as an adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcer management. Data Availability All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. References ↵ Armstrong , D. G. , Tan , T. W. , Boulton , A. J. M. , & Bus , S. A. ( 2023 ). Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review . JAMA , 330 ( 1 ), 62 – 75 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lo , Z. J. , Surendra , N. K. , Saxena , A. , & Car , J. ( 2021 ). Clinical and economic burden of diabetic foot ulcers: A 5-year longitudinal multi-ethnic cohort study from the tropics . International wound journal , 18 ( 3 ), 375 – 386 . doi: 10.1111/iwj.13540 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wang , X. , Yu , Z. , Zhou , S. , Shen , S. , & Chen , W. ( 2022 ). The Effect of a Compound Protein on Wound Healing and Nutritional Status . Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM , 2022, 4231516 . doi: 10.1155/2022/4231516 OpenUrl CrossRef Ferreira , G. , Bernardo , A. C. , Carvalho , A. , & Pereira , M. G. ( 2023b ). Relax to Heal? Perspectives of Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Health Professionals on Relaxation Sessions for Wound Healing . Advances in skin & wound care , 36 ( 6 ), 1 – 10 . doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000922832.62539.a3 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Pradhan , L. , Nabzdyk , C. , Andersen , N. , LoGerfo , F. , & Veves , A. ( 2009 ). Inflammation and neuropeptides: the connection in diabetic wound healing . Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine , 11 . doi: 10.1017/s1462399409000945 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Gouin , J. , Carter , C. , PournajafiLNazarloo , H. , Glaser , R. , Malarkey , W. , Loving , T. , … & KiecoltLGlaser , J. ( 2010 ). Marital behavior, oxytocin, vasopressin, and wound healing . Psychoneuroendocrinology , 35 ( 7 ), 1082 – 1090 . doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.009 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kuebler , U. , Wirtz , P. , Sakai , M. , Stemmer , A. , & Ehlert , U. ( 2013 ). Acute stress reduces wound-induced activation of microbicidal potential of ex vivo isolated human monocyte-derived macrophages . Plos One , 8 ( 2 ), e55875 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055875 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Pereira , M. G. , Vilaça , M. , Pedras , S. , Carvalho , A. , Vedhara , K. , Dantas , M. J. , Lopes , A. , & Faria , S. ( 2025 ). Effectiveness of Relaxation and Hypnosis Interventions in Distressed Patients With Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Longitudinal Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial . Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress , 41 ( 2 ), e70029 . doi: 10.1002/smi.70029 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Ferreira , G. , Faria , S. , Carvalho , A. , & Pereira , M. G. ( 2023a ). Relaxation intervention to improve diabetic foot ulcer healing: Results from a pilot randomized controlled study . Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society , 31 ( 4 ), 528 – 541 . doi: 10.1111/wrr.13085 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Broadbent , E. , Kahokehr , A. , Booth , R. J. , Thomas , J. , Windsor , J. A. , Buchanan , C. M. , Wheeler , B. R. , Sammour , T. , & Hill , A. G. ( 2012 ). A brief relaxation intervention reduces stress and improves surgical wound healing response: a randomised trial . Brain, behavior, and immunity , 26 ( 2 ), 212 – 217 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.06.014 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kutenai , H. J. , Jafari , H. , Shafipour , V. , Zarghami , M. , & Moosazadeh , M. ( 2023 ). Comparison of the effects of Benson relaxation technique and nature sounds on pain, anxiety, and body image in burn-injured patients admitted to the burn ICU: A single-blind randomized clinical trial . Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries , 49 ( 6 ), 1439 – 1447 . doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.12.013 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Robinson , H. , Norton , S. , Jarrett , P. , & Broadbent , E. ( 2017 ). The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: a systematic review of randomized trials . British Journal of Health Psychology , 22 ( 4 ), 805 – 835 . doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12257 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Muhrawi , Y. , Yunding , J. , & Harli , K. ( 2022 ). The relationship of psychological stress on diabetic wound healing processes: a literature review . pnr , 13 ( S01 ). doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s01.106 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Walburn , J. , Vedhara , K. , Hankins , M. , Rixon , L. , & Weinman , J. ( 2009 ). Psychological stress and wound healing in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Journal of Psychosomatic Research , 67 ( 3 ), 253 – 271 . doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.002 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Herman , J. P. , McKlveen , J. M. , Ghosal , S. , Kopp , B. , Wulsin , A. , Makinson , R. , Scheimann , J. , & Myers , B. ( 2016 ). Regulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Stress Response . Comprehensive Physiology , 6 ( 2 ), 603 – 621 . doi: 10.1002/cphy.c150015 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Marucha , P. , KiecoltLGlaser , J. , & Favagehi , M. ( 1998 ). Mucosal wound healing is impaired by examination stress . Psychosomatic Medicine , 60 ( 3 ), 362 – 365 . doi: 10.1097/00006842-199805000-00025 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Glaser , R. , Kiecolt-Glaser , J. , Marucha , P. , MacCallum , R. , Laskowski , B. , & Malarkey , W. ( 1999 ). Stress-related changes in proinflammatory cytokine production in wounds . Archives of General Psychiatry , 56 ( 5 ), 450 . doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.5.450 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science RomanaLSouza , B. , Pôrto , L. , & MonteLAltoLCosta , A. ( 2010 ). Cutaneous wound healing of chronically stressed mice is improved through catecholamines blockade . Experimental Dermatology , 19 ( 9 ), 821 – 829 . doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01113.x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Razjouyan , J. , Grewal , G. , Talal , T. , Armstrong , D. , Mills , J. , & Najafi , B. ( 2017 ). Does physiological stress slow down wound healing in patients with diabetes? . Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology , 11 ( 4 ), 685 – 692 . doi: 10.1177/1932296817705397 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Jozic , I. , Vukelic , S. , Stojadinović , O. , Liang , L. , Ramirez , H. , Pastar , I. , … & Canic , M. ( 2017 ). Stress signals, mediated by membranous glucocorticoid receptor, activate plc/pkc/gsk-3β/β-catenin pathway to inhibit wound closure . Journal of Investigative Dermatology , 137 ( 5 ), 1144 – 1154 . doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.036 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Christian , L. , Graham-Engeland , J. , Padgett , D. , Glaser , R. , & KiecoltLGlaser , J. ( 2006 ). Stress and wound healing . Neuroimmunomodulation , 13 ( 5-6 ), 337 – 346 . doi: 10.1159/000104862 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted April 28, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials Daanyal Noor Farrukh , Misbah Munaf Gaurd , Mohammad Dawood Farrukh , Fiza Farrukh-Hassan medRxiv 2025.04.26.25326493; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.26.25326493 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Effectiveness of Relaxation Therapy for Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials Daanyal Noor Farrukh , Misbah Munaf Gaurd , Mohammad Dawood Farrukh , Fiza Farrukh-Hassan medRxiv 2025.04.26.25326493; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.26.25326493 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4435) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15229) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6600) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4536) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (541) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15916) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3332) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9232) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00c21ce6ef9e13d',t:'MTc3OTYyMzk0Mw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00