Abstract
Aquatic invasive species (AIS) pose a significant risk to global ecosystems, economies, and societies. In the United States, the live baitfish trade is a major pathway for their spread. While the presence of invasive species and pathogens in this trade has been documented, a comprehensive, nationwide analysis of the regulations governing live baitfish has been lacking. This study fills that gap by systematically mapping state-level and federal regulations across the U.S. Our analysis reveals significant variations in regulatory strength. States in the western and northern regions generally have more robust regulations, with some imposing complete bans on live baitfish use. Conversely, many southern and eastern states have weaker regulations, leaving gaps that could facilitate the spread of AIS. These findings provide a crucial resource for policymakers and researchers to evaluate existing policies, identify weaknesses, and develop more effective strategies to address risks posed by aquatic invasive species.
Full text
1,761 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Aquatic invasive species (AIS) pose a significant risk to global ecosystems, economies, and societies. In the United States, the live baitfish trade is a major pathway for their spread. While the presence of invasive species and pathogens in this trade has been documented, a comprehensive, nationwide analysis of the regulations governing live baitfish has been lacking. This study fills that gap by systematically mapping state-level and federal regulations across the U.S. Our analysis reveals significant variations in regulatory strength. States in the western and northern regions generally have more robust regulations, with some imposing complete bans on live baitfish use. Conversely, many southern and eastern states have weaker regulations, leaving gaps that could facilitate the spread of AIS. These findings provide a crucial resource for policymakers and researchers to evaluate existing policies, identify weaknesses, and develop more effective strategies to address risks posed by aquatic invasive species.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X21M1H
Aquaculture and Fisheries Life Sciences, Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Policy, Marine Biology, Public Policy
Arkansas, case law, exotic, fathead minnow, golden shiner, statutes
Published: 2025-09-10 13:37
Last Updated: 2025-09-10 13:37
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.