Comparing the Diagnostic Value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in Women with an Adnexal Mass
This study compared the diagnostic value of ROMA and RMI in women with adnexal masses and found ROMA to be more sensitive for diagnosing ovarian cancer, particularly in postmenopausal patients.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This cross-sectional study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in 245 women presenting with adnexal masses. By measuring serum HE4 and CA-125 levels alongside ultrasound findings, the researchers calculated malignancy probabilities for both indices prior to surgical intervention and pathological confirmation. The results indicated that ROMA demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to RMI for diagnosing ovarian cancer, borderline tumors, and endometriosis, particularly in postmenopausal patients. Relevance to endometriosis: Endometriosis is explicitly listed as one of the conditions for which ROMA showed higher sensitivity than RMI, although the paper's primary focus remains on differentiating malignant from benign ovarian pathology.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
6,329 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 6 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
References
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (21)
- W1716576701 via openalex
- W1870449766 via openalex
- W1973304021 via openalex
- W1980181125 via openalex
- W2024743173 via openalex
- W2043621331 via openalex
- W2097907626 via openalex
- W2106787323 via openalex
- W2118656195 via openalex
- W2124345906 via openalex
- W2124438642 via openalex
- W2230000856 via openalex
- W2291806982 via openalex
- W2515314314 via openalex
- W2570618306 via openalex
- W2778200027 via openalex
- W2808074937 via openalex
- W2991773883 via openalex
- W3027875107 via openalex
- W3035130918 via openalex
- W4210987384 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-21T06:37:11.537704+00:00