Functional Reorganization of Motor Subcircuits in Parkinson’s disease

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This resting-state fMRI study compared functional connectivity patterns in people with mild-to-moderate Parkinson’s disease (n = 58) versus neurotypical older adults (n = 24), using the NeuroMark independent component template and a motor-effector-specific mapping of primary motor cortex (M1) for internally generated and externally generated movement-related pathways. The main finding was functional reorganization in Parkinson’s disease characterized by effector-specific increases and decreases in connectivity, especially robustly increased coupling of M1 subregions for leg, hand, and larynx with cerebellar territories (Crus II and Lobules VIIIa/VIIIb), alongside cerebellar-linked increases involving postcentral gyrus and mixed caudate connectivity changes. Disease severity analysis showed mild impairments across leg, hand, and larynx but disproportionately greater hand-related deficits, which the authors note may contribute to the observed connectivity differences; a further caveat is that these results are based on resting-state connectivity rather than direct causal mechanisms for movement control. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,882 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Parkinson’s disease disrupts motor control across multiple body parts, yet the neural mechanisms underlying these impairments remain incompletely defined. We compared resting-state functional connectivity in people with mild-to-moderate Parkinson’s disease (n = 58) and neurotypical older adults (n = 24), focusing on regions implicated in internally generated (IG) and externally generated (EG) movement pathways. For our analysis, we leveraged the reproducible NeuroMark independent component template and motor effector-specific mapping of primary motor cortex (M1). Our results reveal both increased and decreased connectivity patterns in Parkinson’s disease: M1 subregions associated with control of the leg, hand, and larynx showed robust increases in connectivity exclusively with cerebellar territories, particularly Crus II and Lobules VIIIa/VIIIb. The postcentral gyrus (primary somatosensory cortex) showed primarily increased connectivity with cerebellar regions and the insula. In contrast, the caudate nucleus displayed a mixed profile, with increased connectivity to the superior temporal gyrus and decreased connectivity to the superior medial frontal gyrus and cerebellar Crus II. Our motor effector-specific analysis of disease severity scores (MDS-UPDRS) in people with Parkinson’s disease revealed mild impairments across all categories (leg, hand, larynx) but disproportionately greater hand-related deficits, suggesting that some of the observed M1 connectivity differences may be influenced by these behavioral asymmetries. These anatomically precise, effector-specific alterations suggest compensatory recruitment of cerebellar circuits in Parkinson’s disease and provide a framework for targeting motor subcircuits in rehabilitation, including dance-based interventions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00