A Common Network of Residue-Residue Contacts Underlies Peptides’ Interactions with MHC Class II Complex

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

The paper investigated how short peptides physically interact with MHC class II molecules by analyzing residue–residue contacts, aiming to identify a shared structural “network” responsible for peptide binding. Using a structural/biophysical analysis of peptide–MHC class II interactions, it reports that interactions across different peptide ligands converge on a common pattern of contacting residues. A key limitation explicitly implied by the nature of the work is that the conclusions are drawn from the modeled/contact-network structural evidence rather than direct in vivo functional testing for all peptide contexts. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The formation of a stable peptide-MHC class II complex is a critical step in the adaptive immune response. In this work, we investigate the residue-residue contacts that ’anchor’ the peptide between the alpha and beta chains of MHC II and examine whether such anchoring residue-residue contacts are shared among different peptide-MHC II complexes. We hypothesize that there is a similarity between the map of contacts of antigenic peptides with the alpha and beta chains of MHC II and the map of contacts of the “natural” complex of MHC II with the CLIP - the fragment of the gamma chain. Thus, the CLIP-MHC II complex – specifically, PDB structure 3PDO - was taken as the prototype for peptide-MHC II interaction. To compare the contact maps between the prototype structure and antigenic peptides/MHC II in 14 crystal structures, we developed a ‘unified numbering system’ for residues in peptide-MHC II complexes. Using this unified residue numbering system, we show that approximately half of the CLIP-MHC II residue-residue contacts have analogs in structures that involve different antigenic peptides and different MHC II (HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and mouse A/B) alpha and beta chains. We present here this common network of contacts that underlies peptide/MHC class II interactions, as well as the structural and physicochemical characteristics of these contacts. Based on these shared characteristics, we propose criteria for the specificity of antigenic peptide loading into MHC II, whereby one can predict whether a particular peptide fragment will bind to MHC II as well as the likely localization of the fragment within the peptide binding groove of MHC II.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00