Investigating a Relation between Amyloid Beta Plaque Burden and Accumulated Neurotoxicity Caused by Amyloid Beta Oligomers

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ), yet the specific link between plaque burden and cognitive decline remains a subject of intense investigation. This paper presents a mathematical model that simulates the coupled dynamics of Aβ monomers, soluble oligomers, and fibrillar species in the brain tissue. By modifying existing moment equations to include a dedicated conservation equation for Aβ monomers, the model explores how various microscopic processes, such as primary nucleation, surface-catalyzed secondary nucleation, fibril elongation, and fragmentation, contribute to macroscopic disease progression. Central to this study is the concept of “accumulated neurotoxicity” as a surrogate marker of biological age, defined as the time-integrated concentration of soluble Aβ oligomers. Unlike plaque burden, accumulated neurotoxicity cannot be reversed, and the harm it causes depends critically on the sequence of events that produced it. Numerical results demonstrate that while plaque burden and neurotoxicity both increase over time, their relationship is non-linear and highly sensitive to the efficiency of protein degradation machinery. Specifically, impaired degradation leads to a rapid advancement of biological age relative to calendar age. The model further identifies oligomer dissociation and fibril fragmentation as potential protective mechanisms that can counterintuitively reduce neurotoxic burden by diverting monomers away from the soluble oligomer pool. These findings provide a quantitative framework for understanding why individuals with similar plaque burdens may experience vastly different cognitive outcomes, underscoring the importance of targeting soluble oligomers early in therapeutic interventions.
Full text 1,948 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ), yet the specific link between plaque burden and cognitive decline remains a subject of intense investigation. This paper presents a mathematical model that simulates the coupled dynamics of Aβ monomers, soluble oligomers, and fibrillar species in the brain tissue. By modifying existing moment equations to include a dedicated conservation equation for Aβ monomers, the model explores how various microscopic processes, such as primary nucleation, surface-catalyzed secondary nucleation, fibril elongation, and fragmentation, contribute to macroscopic disease progression. Central to this study is the concept of “accumulated neurotoxicity” as a surrogate marker of biological age, defined as the time-integrated concentration of soluble Aβ oligomers. Unlike plaque burden, accumulated neurotoxicity cannot be reversed, and the harm it causes depends critically on the sequence of events that produced it. Numerical results demonstrate that while plaque burden and neurotoxicity both increase over time, their relationship is non-linear and highly sensitive to the efficiency of protein degradation machinery. Specifically, impaired degradation leads to a rapid advancement of biological age relative to calendar age. The model further identifies oligomer dissociation and fibril fragmentation as potential protective mechanisms that can counterintuitively reduce neurotoxic burden by diverting monomers away from the soluble oligomer pool. These findings provide a quantitative framework for understanding why individuals with similar plaque burdens may experience vastly different cognitive outcomes, underscoring the importance of targeting soluble oligomers early in therapeutic interventions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Abbreviations - AD - Alzheimer’s disease - Aβ - amyloid beta - CV - control volume

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00